Photomontage from John Heartfield to the Iraq war


This 4 May 2012 video from London, England says about itself:

“Iraq: how, where, for whom?” – Kennard-Phillips and Hanaa Malallah

The Mosaic Rooms, 226 Cromwell Road SW5 0SW
19 April – 12 May 2012
Tues – Sat 11-6pm

What does War achieve and what is achieved by re-presenting acts of violence as images?

“Iraq: how, where, for whom?” generates a series of issues not only about the technique of montage but also whether creating images of atrocities committed against people through war achieves anything, socially or politically, or whether images saturated with an artistic aesthetic – the act of arranging, layering and placing (textures, colours, shapes) – risks overwhelming the initial intention of dissent.

Peter Kennard is well known in the UK as a leading exponent of ‘photomontage’ in the Heartfield tradition. His work spans almost half a century producing images for CND and political campaigns against war and social injustice. The iconic image of his “Haywain with Cruise Missiles” critique is as familiar to people as Constable’s painting of an idyllic England. In recent years he teamed up with Cat Phillips to produce a body of collaborative photomontage works which rage against [their] country’s culture of perpetrating aggressive acts of war – particularly against Iraq. In this exhibition they rest alongside Hanaa Malallah’s orchestrated debris gleaned from her country’s experience (Iraq) as a victim to these barbaric and illegal acts. This empathetic combination from both sides has resulted in an exhibition of works which should be seen.

Hannah Malallah is one of Iraq’s leading contemporary artists. Peter Kennard is a senior lecturer at the Royal College of Art.

From daily The Morning Star in Britain:

John Heartfield and Hanna’ Malallah & kennard phillipps

Tate Modern, London SE1, The Mosaic Rooms, London SW5

Friday 04 May 2012

Since the late 19th-century invention of cheap reprographic printing processes, artists have grappled with the dilemma of making their works relevant to a public already inundated with sophisticated, mostly photographic, mass-media imagery.

In the aftermath of WWI, most artists still disdained or competed with photography. But the communist artist John Heartfield embraced it, so pioneering photomontage in Germany. Committing his talent to the political struggle he understood that photographic imagery and cinema were popular with the masses because they expressed the complexities of modernity in a visually accessible way.

Using satire, humour and visual wit he appropriated and then subverted the mass media’s processes and forms in order to expose the reactionary obfuscations and lies of its messages.

Heartfield amazed his public by juxtaposing separate realities, manipulating scales and using trick photographic techniques such as double exposure and X-ray and added text to convey precise meanings as succinctly as poetry.

By bringing together separate realities he created new ones which revealed the truth.

John Heartfield, This is the salvation that they bring

The ironically captioned This Is The Salvation That They Bring from 1938, protesting at nazi aerial bombings in Spain, transmutes the skeletal fingers of an X-rayed hand into tail smoke from war planes, beneath which lie ruined buildings and murdered children.

Some such as The Spirit Of Geneva (1932), in which the dove of peace is sliced dead by a bayonet, have become iconic. First produced in protest at the shooting of demonstrating workers in Geneva, home of the League of Nations, he reused the motif in East Germany under the slogan Never Again in 1960 and with a poem for peace in 1967.

Rejecting the bourgeois notion of art as a unique commodity, Heartfield’s images were widely dispersed in posters, book jackets, pamphlets and magazines, using mass printing technology.

Probably his most famous works are those for the communist magazine AIZ – the Workers Illustrated Paper – for which he produced montages, sometimes weekly, between 1930 and 1938. A number of them were also flyposted as posters.

Art world legend relates that as a political refugee in Britain during WWII, Heartfield offered his work to the Tate Gallery but they rejected it saying it was not art. Although long acknowledged as a giant of 20h-century art by graphic designers, he is still not accorded this status by the dominant art history narrative.

It is a delight that an entire room of his work is currently on loan to Tate Modern from a private collection. Because this is a free “display” rather than a paying exhibition it has not been hyped by the media and it’s really not to be missed.

In the 1960s the discovery of photomontage by Heartfield and the Soviet Constructivists enabled Peter Kennard to find his voice as a politically committed socialist artist. Photomontages such as his poster showing a cruise missile breaking against the CND logo are well known on the left.

Since 2003 he has collaborated with Cat Phillipps and they now work as a collective under the name kennardphillipps. Like Heartfield, they engage directly with capitalist mass media to subvert its pernicious deceptions.

The series The War You Don’t See uses the same hand-crafted photomontage technique as Heartfield. In some the very “crudity” of this approach – one now unfamiliar to younger artists used to slick digital image manipulation – adds visual punch to the message and implies a critical attitude to expensive electronic media.

Yet their video and digitally printed protest banner shows that they do embrace electronic processes. They use them but refute their tyranny. Their large wall pieces marry digital printing processes with the handcrafted to create tactile, fragile surfaces made from glued layers of newspapers, overprinted and painted.

From afar, George Bush A Portrait (2007) shows a photograph of the president. But seen close-to we discover that this image is digitally printed onto a surface made up of faded sheets of the Houston Chronicle with its inane capitalist content.

Parts of this are ripped to reveal the Arabic newspaper beneath, its coloured images exposing the savagery, torture and destruction which the US inflicted on Iraq and its people.

The Iraqi artist Hanaa´ Malallah’s works are born of direct experience of the war.

Hanaa' Malallah, USA Heritage Flag

This work by Hanaa´ Malallah refers to the Iraqi journalist who threw shoes at George W Bush.

Her aesthetically seductive wall hangings and sculptures reveal their message subtly. Small pieces of thin, frayed canvas are scorched, burned and torn, so evoking the destruction, insecurity and fear which war brings.

But they are then patiently stitched, stuffed, interwoven with string and pasted together so asserting the resilience, tenacity and will of her people to survive and rebuild.

Malallah and kennardphillipps’s collaborative exhibition creates a powerful indictment of the greed, hypocrisy and lies with which western politicians, multinationals and corporate media colluded in the occupation and destruction of Iraq. Iraq: How, Where, For Whom? runs until June 8, free. Opening times: (020) 7370-9990. John Heartfield runs at Tate Modern until the end of December 2012, free. Opening times: (020) 7887-8000.

London’s Tate Modern shows photomontages of John Heartfield: here.

No Olympic missiles, London workers say


This video is about the London rooftop missile plans.

Last weekend, residents at Lexington Building in London’s Bow Quarter received an unexpected item in the post. A leaflet from the Ministry of Defence (MoD) informed them that the Army planned to install a High Velocity Missile system on the roof of the complex, as part of the security arrangements for the 2012 Olympic Games in July: here.

By Rory MacKinnon in England:

Workers slam ‘gung-ho halfwits’

Friday 04 May 2012

London’s trade unionists joined the campaign to keep army missiles off the city’s rooftops yesterday.

Greenwich and Bexley Trades Council condemned a “ridiculous boys and their big toys” exercise yesterday as Bow residents gathered to discuss the missiles that army chiefs say will protect the Olympic Games.

The battery atop the Bow Quarter estate – the former Bryant and May match factory – is just one of six caches of rockets designed to shoot down planes.

But the trades council’s Dave Putson said defence officials had treated the project as nothing more than “a great PR exercise.”

The missiles themselves made the flats potential targets for a terrorist attack, he said, but defence officials haven’t even talked to locals about it.

He said that, if the missiles are shot at planes, scores of people could be killed by falling wreckage in east and south-east London.

“It is fair to say that (Greenwich and Bexley and Bow Quarter residents) are both opposed to this ridiculous ‘boys and their big toys’ plan from a bunch of gung-ho halfwits,” he said.

But defence officials insisted they had done their due diligence.

Lt Col Nick Short told the Morning Star they had thought about the missile deployment for a long time and had conducted risk assessments.

But the ministry did not routinely publish assessments as the information would then become a “how-to guide” for terrorists.

It was still not certain the ministry would deploy the missiles at all, he added.

“Drones, Missiles, and an Gunships, Oh My!” Welcome to the London Olympics by Dave Zirin: here.

Housing charity Shelter condemned landlords in east London on Tuesday who are evicting tenants in an attempt to cash in on the Olympics: here.

New Romanian government


This video is about shale gas in Romania and Chevron.

By Tom Mellen:

PM promises to boost government wages

Friday 04 May 2012

Romania‘s new government said today that it will boost public-sector wages that were cut by a quarter to get a £16 billion IMF loan in 2010.

New Prime Minister Victor Ponta, picked by President Traian Basescu after mass anti-cuts protests booted out the previous right-wing government, also promised to slice a tax on bread from 24 to 9 per cent.

Parliament is expected to approve his cabinet on Monday. It is made up mostly by Social Democrat MPs with some National Liberals and Conservatives.

A confidence vote last week toppled a right-wing coalition that had been in power for two months.

Aside from the cuts, it had been criticised for handing shale gas rights to US energy giant Chevron.

Mr Ponta temporarily banned shale gas exploration on Thursday.

He also promised to take another look at plans to build Europe’s biggest opencast gold mine in Transylvania, which many Romanians oppose.

Rosia Montana Gold Corporation, mostly owned by Canadian company Gabriel Resources with a small stake held by state firm Minvest, has pushed for 14 years to get the right mining permits.

President Basescu urged the previous government to hurry things up, saying it would bring in foreign cash.

But local residents, environmentalists and academics have protested against the mine, which would use 12,000 tons of cyanide a year.

British voters defeat Conservatives


This is a video about the British Conservative Prime Minister. It is called David Cameron admits government corruption.

From Socialist Worker weekly in Britain:

10.04am Fri 4 May 2012

Local elections: Big losses for Tories as voters reject austerity

by Charlie Kimber

The election results last night show a profound rejection of the coalition and its assault on working people. Voters slaughtered the Lib Dems across Britain, with their results as bad as those in the immediate aftermath of the betrayal over tuition fees.

The Tories, who used the Lib Dems as a human shield in last year’s elections, themselves crashed this time. The party’s losses have already kicked off internal fighting with calls from senior backbenchers for even nastier and more right wing policies.

Labour, the default option for most people when they wanted to punish the coalition, has made real gains. So far the party has won an extra 470 councillors and is on track to win more than 700.

But Labour still leaves many voters uninspired—as we may see today when the results for the London mayor and Glasgow city council are announced. And a genuinely popular Labour party would have pushed up the turnout in the elections. Overall less than one in three people voted.

Candidates running to the left of Labour showed the potential for resistance through the ballot box as well as on the streets.

In Preston, Socialist Worker supporter Michael Lavalette won a tremendous victory, beating the well-rooted Labour councillor by nearly 100 votes—despite a hugely concentrated attempt by Labour to hold on to the ward.

Michael’s success came from years of work since the start of the Iraq war, his previous record as a councillor, a lively campaign and the feeling against cuts, racism and imperialism.

In Bradford, Respect won five of the 12 seats it contested. Its continuing success in the city included defeating the Labour council leader. He had been a councillor for 17 years.

Partly as a response to the coalition’s NHS privatisation bill, in Wyre Forest the Independent Community and Health Concern group won a further three councillors, taking its tally to eight.

In other places the move to Labour squeezed socialist candidates, with Dave Nellist regrettably losing his Coventry seat.

But Tony Mulhearn won nearly 5,000 votes standing for Liverpool mayor for the Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition. TUSC supporters also recorded good results in areas including Cambridge, Barnsley and Manchester.

Meanwhile the Nazi BNP has had a bad election so far, losing three councilors and gaining none.

The coalition government is rocking. Overall the Tories (31 percent of the vote) and the Lib Dems (16 percent) have less than a majority. They have no mandate and no plans except to hit workers harder and to divide the opposition through racism and scapegoating.

The strike on Thursday, 10 May, is a key opportunity for everyone to weaken the coalition further. It’s time to pressure the union leaders to call more and bigger united action that can ram home the advantage against this tottering government.

And the left needs to discuss how we can build a stronger and more united opposition to the Tories and Lib Dems and a more powerful socialist challenge.

See also here. And here.

Warsi scandal shows Britain’s Conservatives rent by factional conflicts: here.

Omani turtles, workers hurt by privatisation


This video is about one of the many turtle nesting beaches at Ras al Hadd in Oman.

From the World Socialist Web Site today:

Omani turtle sanctuary strike

Around 40 staff at the Ras Al Jinz Scientific Research Centre continued their strike for a second day Monday.

“We had given notice to the management on April 8, and since we didn’t get a reply for 20 days we decided to go on strike,” Nasser Al Zedjali, an assistant guide, told Gulf News.

The staff action halted all turtle watching activities at the turtle reserve. Al Zedjali said that soon after control of the turtle reserve was transferred to a commercial entity, the employees were promised better conditions.

But instead, no new guides were appointed and the number of tourists permitted to watch turtles hatching was increased from 80 to 100 a night to about 180 to 200.

Al Zedjali said more visitors could keep turtles away, but “No one seems to be bothered as their only aim is to make money.”

Promised increments and bonuses were not given in the last four years.

Green turtles nest at Ras al-Jinz.

This video from the USA is called “Teamsters and Turtles Together“: Andre Benjamin in Battle in Seattle.

United States poverty and health


This video from the USA is called Life Expectancy Rising Faster for Men Than Women.

By Kate Randall in the USA:

The social crisis in the US and the 2012 elections

4 May 2012

Three and a half years into the economic crisis, the conditions of life facing millions of people in the US are disastrous. Whatever the talk of an economic “recovery,” poverty, perpetual unemployment, impossible levels of debt pervade American society.

One recent report provides a stark portrait of the “third world” conditions in broad swaths of the country. According to the report, on life expectancy, preschoolers in many areas can expect to live no longer than children in some of the most impoverished countries in the world. In hundreds of counties, these rates have either shown no improvement or worsened.

The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), based at the University of Washington, compiled data on every county in the US, calculating life expectancy each year from 1989 through 2009 and comparing county life expectancies to those in other countries worldwide. There is little doubt that the conditions of life for many of the areas with the lowest life expectancies are worse now than the last year included in the study, 2009.

The institute’s findings are alarming in two respects. Not only have improvements in US life expectancy lagged behind those in Western Europe, Scandinavia, Australia, Japan and elsewhere, but there are vast disparities from county to county in how long Americans can expect to live—sometimes varying by as much as 16 years.

In 2009, the average life expectancy for US men was 76.2 years, up 4.6 years since 1989. Life expectancy for women rose only 2.7 years over this same period, to 81.3 years. But IHME’s William Heisel commented that these modest changes were “not a great improvement. That’s far behind the countries that are doing the best.”

How long a child born in 2009 can expect to live varies dramatically depending on his or her place of birth. In Marin County, California, with a median household income of $91,792 in 2009, men can expect to live to 81.6 years. But in Quitman and Tunica counties in Mississippi, male life expectancy is just 66 years—comparable to Pakistan. Median household income for these two counties was $24,491 and $27,218, respectively, in 2009.

While life expectancy for women in Collier County, Florida stood at 85.8 years in 2009, women in McDowell, West Virginia could only expect to live to 74 years, about the same as in Algeria. Again, the difference in life expectancy corresponded to a disparity in median household income—$52,988 in Collier and $21,474 in McDowell.

In the Kansas City metropolitan area, comparisons of life expectancies by county demonstrate a growing social divide. The Kansas City (Missouri) Health Department tracked life expectancy by city ZIP codes and found one with a life expectancy of 85 years and another with only 69 years—a staggering difference of 16 years.

The IHME research shows that the biggest drivers of health disparities—and hence preventable causes of death—include tobacco use, high cholesterol, high blood pressure, obesity and alcohol abuse. Such deaths, however, are only “preventable” to the extent that the health care system works to prevent these conditions in the first place, and that there is proper medical intervention to treat them if they develop.

In fact, pervasive poverty, stress over working conditions, lost jobs, foreclosures and mounting household debt are contributing factors to deteriorating health for millions of US families—a situation that has worsened as a result of the recession. As the WSWS reports in the series “Hunger stalks America,” one in six Americans—or about 500 million people—now struggle with hunger and are turning to food banks in record numbers.

USA: Unemployment Rate Falls To 8.1 Percent As People Give Up On Looking For Work: here.

This Is Why You’re Fat: The 2012 Farm Bill and the Real Obesity Lobby. Suzanne Merkelson, Republic Report: “There’s no data available yet on lobbying on the new farm bill, but a look at OpenSecrets’ database on the 2007 bill provides a look at who might be involved this time around: Big Agriculture – which spends millions lobbying the federal government on food policy … As the 2012 farm bill heads from the Senate to the House of Representatives, it’s important to keep in mind that this isn’t just a farm bill – it’s a food bill, helping to dictate what kinds of food people can afford”: here.

HOW POVERTY AFFECTS YOUR BRAIN “Imaging studies show that the conditions that go hand-in-hand with poverty — a combination of environmental factors and emotional stressors — can actually slow the development of crucial parts of the brain involved in regulating behavior, impulsivity, and mood. And lacking resources appears to promote certain behaviors (such as excessive borrowing) that perpetuate the poverty cycle.” [Attention]

Millions of tax dollars for killing egrets


This video from the USA is called Brown-headed cowbird.

From Wildlife Extra:

US spends millions killing dangerous pests – Mallards, egrets, godwits & doves

2400 ‘dangerous’ mallard ducks were killed by US ‘Wildlife Services’

USA has spent $1 billion killing wildlife – Why?

May 2012. The US Government spends hundreds of millions every year on ‘exterminating wildlife pests’. We can understand that, in some cases, perhaps a Mountain lion that is killing sheep, or ….? There must be something else; there can be a good reason to kill a few animals, but the number and species that have actually been killed seem extraordinary.

‘Dangerous animals’ – A joke

However Wildlife Extra has looked at the list of animals that were killed in 2010 by a US federal agency, ‘Wildlife Services’ and found the following dangerous animals and pests were amongst those killed by the ‘Wildlife Services’. Surely some of this is a joke.

The dangerous pests include:

2400 Mallard ducks
130,000 brown headed cowbirds
20,000 Mourning doves (20 million are shot annually for sport)
3500 cattle egrets
3 merlins
100,000 grackles
2 bar tailed godwits
360 cougar
600 otters (of which 450 were ‘unintentional’)
200 Great horned owls
2 whimbrel

To see the full list, click here.

WildEarth Guardians sues USA’s biggest wildlife killer: The Federal Government

WildEarth Guardians has sued the federal agency responsible for killing more than 5 million animals annually for its refusal to analyse the environmental consequences of its actions in almost two decades.

$1 billion spent on killing 23 million animals

Between 2004 and 2010, Wildlife Services, a branch of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, spent nearly $1 billion to kill nearly 23 million animals using aerial guns, poisons, traps, snares, and hounds, purportedly to protect agriculture and other private interests as part of a grossly ineffective and wasteful program. Wildlife Services, however, continues to rely on a woefully outdated environmental analysis for its wildlife-killing activities that fails to take into account new reports on the risks and inefficiencies of its program, evolving public values for wildlife, and new scientific and economic information concerning wildlife management.

‘Wildlife services’

“Wildlife Services employs an arsenal of weaponry to kill America’s native wildlife and it’s time that courts neutralize this agency. We want the court to ban its poisons, silence its guns, and pull up its traps because it’s a horrendous misuse of our tax dollars to slaughter the nation’s bears, wolves, coyotes, and myriad other species,” said Wendy Keefover, Director of Carnivore Protection for WildEarth Guardians.

Outdated information

Wildlife Services relies on an 18 year-old environmental document to conduct its wildlife-eradication programs in violation of federal law. The research cited in that assessment dates as far back as 1936, with most studies dating from the 1980’s. WildEarth Guardians has presented significant new information to the agency on the costs, ineffectiveness, and environmental harms of wildlife-killing programs to the agency, but it has refused to consider the new data in implementing its actions.

“Wildlife Services relies upon antiquated studies in order to justify its wildlife-killing activities,” said Ashley Wilmes, staff attorney for WildEarth Guardians, “and we want it to shut down its lethal operations-particularly those that are conducted in designated Wilderness Areas.”

Cyanide booby traps & helicopters

Wildlife Services liberally distributes sodium cyanide booby traps and shoots tens of thousands of native carnivores such as coyotes and wolves from helicopters and airplanes on public lands, including in wilderness areas in violation of federal law. The agency’s killing methods are ubiquitous and indiscriminate and annually kill untold numbers of “non-target” species.

Wildlife Services last issued a review of its program in 1994, when it studied the environmental consequences of killing only 17 target species, based upon its records from 1988. Since that study, its budget has grown by about 400 percent and the numbers of target species it kills is closer to 300.

About half of Wildlife Services’ budget is funded from federal tax dollars, while the rest is provided by unnamed “cooperators” such as states, counties, municipalities, and even industry groups like the American Sheep Industry Alliance and the Farm Bureau.

2010 – $126 million to kill 5 million animals

“Under the National Environmental Policy Act, Wildlife Services cannot continue to rely on this outdated and insufficient analysis of its program, especially since the agency spent $126 million in 2010 to kill 5,008,928 animals,” said Wilmes.

The agency has been audited several times by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Inspector General and sanctioned by the Environmental Protection Agency because of the dangers it poses to the public and its own employees, including even bioterrorism hazards and aircraft accidents.

“All this killing has no real benefit-even to the massive agricultural industry it purports to support. It’s time that Wildlife Services stops costly and egregious wildlife killing on our nation’s public and private lands,” stated Keefover. “A thorough environmental analysis might finally reveal the uselessness and futile nature of Wildlife Services and shutter its operations.”

Stop fake beauty standards for girls


This video says about itself:

A little reminder that even Supermodels don’t look like Supermodels. Airbrushing, recoloring, even Feature Reassignment. Part of Dove’s Campaign For Real Beauty.

By Sarah B. Weir, Yahoo! blogger in the USA:

Teen Girl Petitions Seventeen Magazine to Stop Airbrushing Models

Wed, May 2, 2012 9:00 AM EDT

Julia Bluhm, 14, is an eighth grader from rural Waterville, Maine. She loves ballet and attends class six days a week. She is also gaining national attention as an activist who is challenging the media to take responsibility for the way it warps girls’ self-esteem.

“I’ve always noticed how a lot of the images in magazines look photo-shopped,” Bluhm tells Yahoo! Shine. She wants all girls to feel comfortable in their own skin. “Girls shouldn’t compare themselves to pictures in magazines,” she says. “Because they are fake.”

Eleven days ago, she launched a petition to ask one of her favorite magazines, Seventeen, to feature one un-retouched photo shoot a month.