Brazilian ants, plants help each other


This 2012 video from Costa Rica is called Amazing Symbiosis: Ant Army Defends Tree | National Geographic.

From the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo in Brazil:

Ants that defend plants receive sugar and protein

July 17, 2019

Summary: The aggressiveness of ants in arid environments with scarce food supply helps protect plants against herbivorous arthropods.

Biologists Laura Carolina Leal and Felipe Passos performed a series of experiments in Brazil’s Northeast region — specifically in the interior of Bahia State, where the semiarid Caatinga biome predominates — to determine how plants with extrafloral nectaries interact with ants.

Extrafloral nectaries are nectar-secreting glands not involved in pollination which supply insects with carbohydrates in exchange for defense against herbivores. The nectar attracts predatory insects that consume both the nectar and plant-eating arthropods, functioning as bodyguards.

“In contrast with the previous belief, we discovered that carbohydrate is only one of the forms of payment offered by plants to the ants that protect them. Another is protein, which ants obtain by consuming the herbivorous arthropods available on or around the plants they visit,” said Leal, a professor in the Federal University of São Paulo’s Institute of Environmental, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences (ICAQF-UNIFESP) in Brazil.

“This finding contradicts the idea that payment is in sugar only,” Leal told. “It shows that what ants gain from herbivores also matters. We discovered that ants may be more aggressive in environments where arthropods and other sources of protein are scarce, defending their food sources and hence protecting plants.”

The study was supported by São Paulo Research Foundation — FAPESP and by the Brazilian education ministry’s graduate research council (CAPES). A paper on it has recently been published in Biological Journal of the Linnean Society.

The research interests pursued by Leal and Passos focus on the various forms of insect-plant mutualism. “Mutualism is a form of interaction between two species in which each benefits from the interaction in some way. If it isn’t advantageous for both species, but only for one, it’s parasitism,” Leal said.

“Several studies have shown that nectarivorous ants expel herbivores and enhance the reproductive success of plants with extrafloral nectaries. The greater the importance of extrafloral nectar to the ants, the better for the plants, as this increases the ants’ aggressiveness toward herbivores. We decided to find out whether nectar is the only payment by plants for the ants’ protection or whether eating herbivores might also be advantageous to the ants.”

Leal and Passos confirmed the hypothesis that plant attendance by more aggressive ants and the efficiency of their defense increase when the availability of carbohydrates and/or proteins to the ants is low, enhancing the relative value of both extrafloral nectaries and protein-rich herbivores to these insects.

The study was conducted on the campus of the University of Feira de Santana in Bahia. The region has a semiarid climate with an annual average temperature of 25.2 °C and rainfall averaging 848 mm per year. The vegetation in the Caatinga is xerophytic (adapted to life in a dry habitat), consisting of a mosaic of thorny shrubs and seasonally dry forests.

The researchers established 19 study plots measuring 16 square meters each, in early 2017. The plots were at least 30 m apart and mainly contained Turnera subulata, a clumping plant in the passionflower family known as white alder. This was the only plant with extrafloral nectaries in the plots. Its density varied from five to 218 individuals per plot.

“T. subulata has a pair of extrafloral nectaries on each petiole [the stalk that attaches the leaf blade to the stem] and inflorescence base,” Leal said. The extrafloral nectaries are constantly visited by different ant species that can defend the plant against herbivores.

“The relative importance of any resource for animals is influenced not only by its abundance in the habitat but also by the number of individuals sharing it. Our first step was therefore to count the nests of ants that foraged in our study plots.”

The researchers left five mixtures of carbohydrate and protein (sardine and honey) as bait in the soil of each plot between 7 and 11 a.m., when ants were most active at the site. One piece of bait was placed at the center and the other four approximately three meters away at the corners.

“We waited until the ants located the bait and followed them back to their nests, even when these were located outside our study site,” Leal said.

They counted the ant nests and estimated the abundance of protein and carbohydrate resources for ants in each plot. Because T. subulata is a prostrate herbaceous plant occurring in open habitats, it is visited mainly by soil-foraging ant species.

“We recorded 312 occurrences of 13 ant species on these plants. Most were visited by two or more ant species simultaneously,” Leal said.

The most frequent species was Camponotus blandus (42% of occurrences), followed by Dorymyrmex piramicus (25.6%). Dead arthropods in the soil are the main source of protein for these ants.

The researchers used soil arthropod biomass as a proxy for protein availability to the ants that visited extrafloral nectaries in each plot. To obtain this metric, they installed five pitfall traps in each plot, again one at the center and one at each corner.

“The pitfall traps remained active for 24 hours. We filtered their content and dried it in an oven at 60 °C for 24 hours. The lower the average dry arthropod biomass collected from each plot was, the lower the local availability of protein to ants,” Leal said.

Less protein, more aggressiveness

The researchers also observed the behavior of ants visiting extrafloral nectaries with regard to a simulated herbivore to determine whether the availability of carbohydrate and/or protein in the habitat affected the efficiency of the ants’ defense.

“We simulated the presence of herbivores on the plants using the larvae of Ulomoides dermestoides, a common predator of peanut seeds known as the peanut beetle or Chinese weevil. On the most apical branch of each focal plant, we placed one larva on the leaf that offered the best horizontal or near-horizontal platform for the insect. We allowed the larva to move freely on the leaf and waited for it to be found by the ants,” Leal said.

The biologists identified the ants present on five plants in each plot and measured their efficiency in removing the simulated herbivores from the plants.

“When a larva was located, we observed the behavior of the ants with regard to the larva. We observed whether the larva was removed from the plant, whether the ants took the larva to the ground, pushed it off the plant, or consumed it where it was,” Leal said.

According to her, the probability of interaction between the plants and more aggressive ant species was not influenced by the number of active extrafloral nectaries or the arthropod biomass found in the plots.

“However, the simulated herbivores were removed more frequently in plots with less arthropod biomass. This suggests that ants, regardless of species, become more aggressive toward other arthropods in protein-poor habitats. This increase in aggressiveness potentially increases the efficiency with which plants that have extrafloral nectaries are defended against herbivores,” Leal said.

Unlike carbohydrates, protein resources are not renewable and are randomly distributed in the environment. Dead insects, for example, have no predictable pattern of distribution and may be found almost anywhere. Once consumed, these dead insects are unavailable to other species of ants in the community.

“This led us to propose that plants with extrafloral nectaries may be more efficiently defended in protein-poor habitats regardless of how much they invest in interaction via nectar secretion,” Leal said.

If so, even plants that secrete low-quality extrafloral nectar may be efficiently defended because the ants’ behavior toward herbivores will be driven by their demand for protein and not for carbohydrates.

Advertisements

Good Brazilian leatherback turtle news


This December 2017 video is called Protecting leatherback turtlesBlue Planet II: Episode 7 Preview – BBC One.

From the University of Exeter in England:

‘Gentle recovery’ of Brazil’s leatherback turtles

July 1, 2019

Brazil’s leatherback turtles are making a “gentle recovery” after 30 years of conservation efforts, new research shows.

Scientists studied nesting sites in the state of Espírito Santo in eastern Brazil — the only place in the south-west Atlantic where leatherbacks regularly nest.

Data on this small population from 1988-2017 showed the average number of nests rose from 25.6 in the first five years of the period to 89.8 in the final five years.

The researchers, from the University of Exeter and Brazilian sea turtle conservation programme TAMAR-ICMBio, believe local conservation efforts have contributed to this increase.

But they say conservation of this population is still a concern due to climate change, pollution, coastal development and “bycatch” (accidental catch by humans fishing).

“The numbers vary year by year, but overall we have seen an increase in the number of leatherback nests in Espírito Santo,” said Dr Liliana Poggio Colman, of the Centre for Ecology and Conservation on the Exeter’s Penryn Campus in Cornwall.

“This gentle recovery is probably due, at least in part, to local conservation efforts started by Projeto TAMAR in the 1980s.

“Our study revealed a significant decrease in the size of the turtles breeding on these beaches, suggesting that new females are joining the breeding population.”

Dr Poggio Colman, who had a scholarship from the programme Science Without Borders, funded by the Brazilian government, added: “We are encouraged by what we have found, but this is a small population — fewer than 20 nesting females per year, each laying several clutches — so their conservation will remain a concern.”

Throughout the study period, nests were concentrated in the southern part of the 100-mile (160km) study area, with the protection of core nesting areas being key for the effective conservation of this population.

Professor Brendan Godley, who was one of Dr Poggio Colman’s PhD supervisors, added: “It was a great pleasure to help facilitate this collaborative work in Brazil.

“By chance, the team was in the field when a major spill of waste mining material impacted in the area in 2015. Average hatching success has, however, remained fairly steady at about 66%.”

Now, let us hope that extreme right Brazilian president Bolsonaro will not manage to damage this recovery; like he damages the Brazilian Amazon rainforest.