NATO bigwigs in Iraq torture scandal

This video is called WikiLeaks Iraq War Logs: Torture, civilian death toll revealed in latest leak.

By Jeffrey Kaye, Truthout in the USA:

Iraqi Torture Scandal Touches Highest Levels of NATO

Thursday 5 January 2012

A scandal unfolding in Denmark over the transfer of Iraqi prisoners by Danish forces to Iraq authorities, even as they knew they would be tortured, threatens to implicate the current Secretary General of NATO Anders Fogh Rasmussen, formerly prime minister of Denmark from 2001-2009.

The defense ministry in the government of former Prime Minister Rasmussen is charged with withholding its knowledge of Iraqi torture from legislators when a copy of a 2004 inspection at Al Makil prison in Basra was sent to Parliament.

According to an article last month in the Danish paper Politiken, portions of the report describing prisoner abuse were “blacked out,” with the reason given that such “information could harm Danish-Iraq cooperation.”

Yet, three months before the prison inspection, in May 2004, during a debate in the Danish Parliament concerning Iraqi prisoners, according to the paper Politik & International (English translation here), then-Prime Minister Rasmussen said the government would “disclose information about torture, if the government becomes aware that it occurs.” But evidently, this did not occur.

According to The Copenhagen Report, a Danish English-language daily, the July 2004 investigation by Danish Army legal adviser Maj. Kurt Borgkvist revealed that “prisoners in Iraqi prisons had been burned with cigarettes, had their molars crushed and been beaten around their genitals. Some were even missing fingers, Borgkvist reported.” The resulting report included photographic evidence, which has been described as “Abu Ghraib-lignende” (“Abu Ghraib-like”) by the previous Danish defense minister.

Rasmussen, leader of Denmark’s Liberal Party, resigned as prime minister in August 2009 in order to accept a position as NATO’s secretary general. Most recently, he was an outspoken supporter of NATO’s military support to the overthrow of the Gaddafi regime in Libya. Last November, the Liberal Party and its coalition partners lost power for the first time in almost a decade, losing to a coalition led by the Social Democrats. Rasmussen was also a key supporter of the US campaign to go to war in Iraq in 2003, ironically citing in a UN address Iraqi violations of international anti-torture treaties.

The scandal first arose in 2010 from documents released by WikiLeaks in the “Iraq War Logs.” A November 2010 article at Ice News reported how a memo released by WikiLeaks described an inquiry by “a Danish Defence Ministry official” regarding “what happened at the American Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq after media reports of torture and abuse in 2003.” Subsequently, “Danish soldiers continued to hand over prisoners to the facility, however, even after the torture was officially confirmed several months later.”

“‘That Denmark didn’t intervene in time simply shows that someone must have stopped the criticism at the political level’, said Social Democratic Defense Spokesman John Dyrby Paulsen. ‘That is also why we want an inquiry into all of this’, he added.”

An October 2010 story in Politik & International noted that “coalition forces share military reports” and “the Danish military has also had access to accounts on Iraqi police methods,” indicating that all the coalition forces, Denmark included, “had knowledge of the situation which was consistent with several highly critical warnings from organizations such as The International Red Cross and Human Rights Watch.”

A government commission into Denmark’s involvement in the Iraq war is expected later this year. The last Danish forces left Iraq last November.

The WikiLeaks logs also revealed that Danish forces in Iraq had been involved in turning greater numbers of prisoners over to the Iraqis than the Danish government had previously revealed.

According to a report at WikiLeaks Press, former Danish Defense Minister Søren Gade previously told the Danish Parliament that Danish troops had only 21 prisoners. But according to the leaked “War Logs,” “the actual number of prisoners taken in the period at a minimum of 95. Of these, 62 were handed over to Iraqi authorities, who were well known to be carrying out torture in Iraqi prisons.” In reply, the Defense Ministry “argued that the reason for the great disparity between the reported number of prisoners was due to the fact that many of the prisoners had been captured by British troops and that the Danish troops therefore could not be held accountable.”

But recent revelations have seen the number of prisoners actually handed over has grown from a later admitted 200 to a reported 500 or more. The higher number surfaced in a memorandum from Defense Chief Gen. Knud Bartels to the new Defense Minister Nick Hækkerup. (Bartels, himself, has recently assumed the position of NATO’s Military Committee chairman.)

In a January 2 article, The Copenhagen Post reported that Denmark’s former Defense Minister Søren Gade would be called as a witness in an upcoming trial, stemming from a lawsuit by six Iraqis who were arrested in winter 2004 by Danish forces supporting the US-led coalition forces in Iraq. The prisoners were turned over to Iraqi forces and subsequently tortured.

As the Post notes, “According to international law, soldiers may not deliver prisoners of war to another authority they suspect of mistreating or torturing prisoners.” This international prohibition is written into the UN Convention Against Torture, which states that no signatory to the treaty can return or refoule any person to a state authority “where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture.”

In a January 5 editorial, the Post insisted that “ordering soldiers to turn a blind eye to the likely mistreatment of detainees amounts to a cold-blooded disregard for the well-being of others.” The paper called for the Danish military to cooperate with any investigations, “even if that means allowing top brass, former ministers or senior statesmen to be felled in the process.”

A further dimension to the scandal concerns not only the number of prisoners involved, but also the ways the Danes tried to hide their culpability.

The Bartels letter to Hækkerup also described, according to Politiken, how “‘in a few cases’ Iraqi prisoners were illegally handed over to Iraqi authorities and that in many cases Danish troops avoided defence directives by letting British troops detain Iraqis during joint missions in order to avoid responsibility.”

The controversy over handing over prisoners to be tortured by Iraqi forces has not been limited to Denmark. Indeed, after the release of the WikiLeaks “Iraq War Logs,” numerous reports of such transfers of prisoners, despite knowledge of torture practices, were published in the British and US press.

According to the publication of one of the “Iraq War Logs” by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, in at least one case, a US military interrogator threatened a prisoner with being turned over to the notorious Iraqi Wolf Brigade, “where he would be subject to all the pain and agony that the wolf battalion is known to exact upon its detainees.”

Similar charges of coalition forces turning prisoners over for torture in Afghanistan have also raised controversy. Last September, NATO announced it was suspending many such transfers after years of reports of torture by Afghan security and military personnel.

The Obama administration has pointedly refused to initiate any investigations into US torture, while the British government has announced formation of a government commission to look into the torture charges. The British commission, which has yet to begin its work, has been boycotted by human rights groups, who describe the commission as “toothless” and lacking “meaningful, independent” review.

NATO headquarters did not return a request for comment as of press time. In addition, attempts to verify details of “Iraq War Logs” information were stymied by what appears to be an Internet-wide suppression of the formerly available documents.

Court Permits Suits Against Private Military Contractors for Torture and War Crimes at Abu Ghraib to Proceed: here.

Fallujah Babies: Birth Defects Blamed on US Weapons. Dahr Jamail, Al Jazeera English: “‘The environment could be contaminated by chemical weapons and depleted uranium from the aftermath of the war on Iraq,’ Dr. Alwachi told Al Jazeera. The US and UK militaries have sent mixed signals about the effects of depleted uranium, but Iraqi doctors like Alwachi and Alani, and along with researchers, blame the increasing cancer and birth defect rates on the weapon”: here.

How many U.S. soldiers were wounded in Iraq? We have no idea: here.

Women are the biggest losers: reflecting on the war in Iraq: here.

Western Oil Firms Remain as US Exits Iraq. Dahr Jamail, Al Jazeera: “The end of the US military occupation does not mean Iraqis have full control of their oil”: here.

UN Human Rights head Navi Pillay calls Iraq’s execution of 34 people in one day shocking: here.

Britain slammed over torture role: here.

Only one in 10 of the prisoners held at the US prison camp at Bagram airbase have been charged and many are being abused and tortured, Afghan investigators revealed on Saturday: here.


31 thoughts on “NATO bigwigs in Iraq torture scandal

  1. Afghan commission alleges US detainee abuse

    By AP News

    Saturday, January 07, 2012

    An Afghan investigative commission accused the American military Saturday of abuse at its main prison in the country, repeating President Hamid Karzai’s demand that the U.S. turn over all detainees to Afghan custody and saying anyone held without evidence should be freed.

    The demands put the U.S. and the Afghan governments on a collision course in an issue that will decide the fate of hundreds of suspected Taliban and al-Qaida operators captured by American forces. The head of the Afghan investigation said U.S. officials told him many of those militant suspects were taken based on intelligence that cannot be used in Afghan courts.

    The dispute that has unfolded in recent days recreates many of the thorny issues surrounding the controversial U.S. detention center at Guantanamo Bay. There, as at the prison in Afghanistan, American forces are holding many detainees without charging them with a specific crime or presenting evidence in a civil court.

    Detainees interviewed during two visits to the U.S.-run portion of the prison outside Bagram Air Base north of Kabul complained of freezing cold, humiliating strip searches and being deprived of light, according to Gul Rahman Qazi, who led the investigation ordered by Karzai.

    Another investigator, Sayed Noorullah, said the prison must be transferred to Afghan control “as soon as possible,” adding that “If there is no evidence … they have the right to be freed.”

    U.S. Embassy spokesman Gavin Sundwall said Saturday that American officials only received the commission’s report after its press briefing. He said all allegations of prisoner abuse are seriously investigated and repeated that the U.S. is committed to turning over all its prisons in Afghanistan “in a responsible manner.”

    Karzai on Thursday abruptly demanded that the U.S. military turn over full control of the prison, officially known as the Parwan Detention Center but generally referred to as the Bagram prison, within a month. A spokesman for the president said Saturday that he made the announcement in response to the investigation team’s report.

    The president’s demand for full control of the prison took many by surprise, since the U.S. and Afghan governments had been working on a gradual timetable for transferring responsibility for the prison over the next two years.

    The escalating dispute could also threaten delicate negotiations the U.S. and Afghanistan for a strategic partnership deal that could leave a small American security force after most foreign troops withdraw in 2014. The status of detainees is a key unresolved issue in the talks.

    According to Qazi, U.S. officials at the prison said they have delayed turning over about 90 percent of the estimated 3,000 detainees held at the prison near Bagram because it fears the suspected militants are too dangerous to be released, as they likely would have to be under Afghanistan’s judicial system

    Officially, U.S. and Afghan militaries jointly run the facility, but the Afghan side controls a small portion with about 300 detainees whose cases are slated to be tried by Afghan judiciary. The U.S. military runs the larger portion of the prison.

    Qazi, who led the ad hoc investigation of the Independent Commission for Overseeing the Implementation of the Constitution, said U.S. prison officials told only 300 of the nearly 3,000 detainees had legal cases against them.

    He said he was told that that 2,700 others were suspected Taliban who were captured using intelligence that could not be used in a court.

    “The foreign friends told us that based on the rules of the battlefield, they are dangerous and cannot be set free,” Qazi told reporters Saturday.

    Nevertheless, the commission repeated Karzai’s demand of full Afghan custody of all prisoners as soon as possible, though it did not set a deadline.

    “Inside Afghanistan, having a prison run by foreigners is not allowed with the respect of Afghan constitution,” Qazi said.

    Besides Afghan militant suspects, the prison near Bagram also holds foreign al-Qaida suspects from several different countries captured in what the U.S. considers battlefield conditions.

    It’s unclear what would happen to those foreign suspects if they were turned over to Afghan custody.


  2. Pingback: Get French troops out of Afghanistan | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: Child prostitution in the Pentagon’s ‘new’ Iraq | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: Photomontage from John Heartfield to the Iraq war | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: CIA torture flights and British investors | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: US veterans protest Chicago NATO summit | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: United States military homicidal Islamophobia | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: ‘Closed’ Iraq torture prison still open | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: WikiLeaks’ Assange seeks asylum in Ecuador | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: Nazis in United States armed forces | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: WikiLeaks’ Assange speech in London, England | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: Australian police violence against peaceful demonstration | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: Torture in British history | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  14. Pingback: Spanish torture in Iraq scandal | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  15. Pingback: Torture ‘rampant’ in Sarkozy’s and Cameron’s ‘new’ Libya | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  16. Pingback: Nelson Mandela, fighter for justice and peace | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  17. Pingback: Tony Blair’s ministers in Iraq war crimes case | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  18. Pingback: NATO expansion, anti-Semitism, Ukraine and Russia | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  19. Pingback: Austerity for people, not for war profiteers, NATO boss says | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  20. Pingback: United States Vice President’s son grabs at Ukrainian gas money | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  21. Pingback: Pakistani, tortured in Iraq, sues British government | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  22. Pingback: Pro-peace protest against NATO conference in Wales | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  23. Pingback: Don’t escalate Ukraine war, United States intelligence veterans say | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  24. Pingback: Britain and more bloodshed in Iraq | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  25. Pingback: Danish soldiers want to get out of re-started Iraq war | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  26. Pingback: Turkish government fights WordPress and Kurds, not ISIS | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  27. Pingback: Tortured Iraqis win British court case | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  28. Pingback: Trump-Turkey war in Syria, Dutch opposition | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.