More strikes in Britain


This is called Socialist Party video – Lindsey Oil Refinery; Workers strike back! 1.

From British daily The Guardian:

More strikes ahead at power plants as oil refinery row rumbles on

Sacked workers at Lindsey plan public burning of dismissal letters

* Martin Wainwright
* Sunday 21 June 2009 17.10 BST

Sacked workers plan a public burning of dismissal letters from the Total oil company …

None of the 647 steel erectors, platers and welders plan to meet the company’s demand that they formally reapply for their jobs as a condition of talks starting. Total was due to meet the GMB and Unite unions and the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service on Friday but withdrew after four hours of preliminary discussions.

Both unions pressed for talks to start tomorrow and warned that sympathy action was likely to spread through the sector. Last week there were walkouts by builders at 17 power stations, refineries and other energy building sites from Yorkshire to south Wales.

From the Campaign Against Immigration Controls in Britain:

Following our conference today (Saturday 20th) the Campaign Against Immigration Controls (CAIC) calls for the immediate reinstatement of the workers who were sacked by Total, Jacobs and other subcontractors at the Lindsey Oil refinery in Lincolnshire last Thursday night.

Solidarity strikes spread like wildfires: here.

Thousands of striking engineering and construction workers are continuing to defy the anti-union laws, insisting that there could be “no compromise” with bosses intent on attacking their unions: here.

Belgian solidarity with Lindsey workers: here.

Update 24 June 2009: here.

Tony Blair inquiry cartoon


Tony Blair inquiry in Britain, cartoon by Martin Rowson

This cartoon is about Tony Blair wanting to prevent a public inquiry in Britain into the Iraq war, about his support for torture, and his money grabbing. The cartoon is by Martin Rowson in daily The Morning Star.

The government appeared to make a U-turn over the Iraq war inquiry on Sunday when a senior minister said that he expected “many” hearings to be held in public.

Peace campaigners were unmoved by the suggestion of a “partial public” hearing into the Iraq war by the inquiry chairman Sir John Chilcot.

Blair was involved in Iraq inquiry talks, minister says: here.

BLAIR FEARS FACING WAR CRIMES TRIBUNAL: here.

The Wagner dynasty and Hitler


This video says about itself:

Max Lorenz was at the height of his career as a heldentenor in 1941. As a homosexual with a Jewish wife in Nazi Germany, he would have faced deportation. However, as Hitler’s favourite tenor and a symbol of his times, he was protected by Hitler and Göring. This gripping, well – researched documentary which is nominated for the FIPA festival boasts original footage of Max Lorenz, Haus Wahnfried and Hitlers visits to Bayreuth (e.g. the first coloured picture of Hitler). Includes interviews with great artists such as Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau and René Kollo. Includes a CD with previously unreleased material of Max Lorenz Siegfried interpretation.

From British weekly The Observer:

Wagner‘s heir vows to lay bare her family’s Nazi history

The great-granddaughter of Hitler’s favourite composer plans to expose how the Bayreuth Festival became connected with the Third Reich

* Kate Connolly in Berlin
* Sunday 21 June 2009

The great-granddaughter of Richard Wagner, Hitler’s favourite composer, has vowed to investigate her family’s links with the Nazis in a move that could be bitterly opposed by other members of the dynasty.

Katharina Wagner, 31, an opera stage director, feels she has a duty to do what previous generations have avoided. “When I was growing up, I was repeatedly confronted with this topic,” she said. “Was my grandmother Hitler’s lover? To what extent was my father embroiled with Hitler? No one in the family ever spoke about it. If my sister and I don’t ask the questions, who then will?” Nine months ago, Katharina took over as co-director of the Bayreuth Festival, which started 133 years ago to showcase Wagner’s work. She has introduced several changes with a view to opening up the event to the masses, including podcasts and giant TV screens, but last week’s announcement that she plans to invite a team of researchers to lay bare the show’s Nazi connections is her most controversial move yet.

“There’s a shadow hanging over Bayreuth, and I feel a responsibility to try to get some clarity,” Katharina said. She said she wanted “independent, renowned historians, and not only those with an affinity to Bayreuth” to carry out their investigations “independently of me and my family”.

Katharina, who took over as festival co-director with her half-sister, Eva Wagner-Pasquier, after a lengthy family feud, said she expected some opposition from members of the clan. However, she said that the private archives of her father Wolfgang would also be open to scrutiny, suggesting he favoured her initiative.

Hitler supported the festival long before he became a political force and befriended Winifred Wagner, the British-born wife of the composer’s son Siegfried. This connection allowed the festival to remain largely independent during the Third Reich and, after the war, led to Winifred’s conviction for supporting the Nazis.

Katharina stressed that “every nook and cranny” of the festival’s archives needed to be raked through. She made the announcement a month before she opens the festival with Wagner-Pasquier for the first time since they took over from Wolfgang Wagner, who ran the show for 54 years but was often accused of a lack of innovation.

The leadership battle was one of the longest and fiercest feuds in the world of classical music, with Katharina’s cousin, Nike, also contesting the post.

Katharina’s announcement about the investigation has attracted as much attention in the German press as did her artistic plans for the programme on the “Green Hill”, as Bayreuth is affectionately known.

There is some doubt as to whether an investigation will throw any new light on the role of the Nazis and how the Wagner clan courted Hitler, experts said. Katharina herself said she did not know what to expect and that, “although the topic has been dealt with, it has clearly not been dealt with extensively enough”.

According to Wolfgang Schreiber, a critic for the Süddeutsche Zeitung: “We can hardly expect anything particularly mind-blowing to emerge from this, because Bayreuth’s ideological past is a well ploughed field.”

Katharina said she was searching for sponsors to finance the investigation. She said she hoped an initial report could be completed by 2013, in time for the 200th anniversary of Wagner’s birth.

In further moves to address her family’s failure to confront its past, she backed an initiative to put plaques in Bayreuth’s park which point out that Arno Brekker [sic; Arno Breker], the creator of sculptures of Richard and Cosima Wagner, was Hitler’s favourite sculptor.

Next year she also plans to host an exhibition on “silenced voices” about the expulsion of Jews from Germany’s opera houses. The former Wagner villa, Haus Wahnfried, will also establish a permanent exhibition of the festival’s Nazi history.

Katharina said she hoped the “soap opera” of the battle for the Bayreuth throne was now over, but highlighted how strained relations still are between her and her estranged cousin, adding that, although she could imagine having a coffee with Nike Wagner, “I won’t be doing the inviting”.

Wagner and the Nazis

· In 1933 the National Socialists staged a ceremony to commemorate the 50th anniversary of Wagner’s death. Winifred, the wife of Wagner’s late son, Siegfried, and her son, Wieland, were guests of honour.

· Hitler attended the Bayreuth Festival every July. Wagner’s music and writings became entwined in the Nazi ideology.

· There is speculation that Winifred and Hitler were lovers, although it may have been just a platonic friendship.

· Hitler’s office gave the Bayreuth festival generous subsidies, and when Winifred’s son Wolfgang (Katharina’s father) passed his driving test, the Führer gave him a Mercedes.

Wolfgang Wagner dies: here.

Blair pushed Brown to hold Iraq war inquiry in private


This is a British video about Tony Blair, nearly arrested at the Iraq war inquiry.

From British weekly The Observer:

Tony Blair pushed Gordon Brown to hold Iraq war inquiry in private

Former PM feared facing ‘show trial’
• Leak reveals plan to provoke invasion

* Toby Helm and Gaby Hinsliff
* Sunday 21 June 2009

Tony Blair urged Gordon Brown to hold the independent inquiry into the Iraq war in secret because he feared that he would be subjected to a “show trial” if it were opened to the public, the Observer can reveal.

The revelation that the former prime minister – who led Britain to war in March 2003 – had intervened will fuel the anger of MPs, peers, military leaders and former civil servants,

and parents of fallen soldiers

who were appalled by Brown‘s decision last week to order the investigation to be conducted behind closed doors.

Blair, who resisted pressure for a full public inquiry while he was prime minister, appears to have taken a deliberate decision not to express his view in person to Brown because he feared it might leak out.

Instead, messages on the issue were relayed through others to Sir Gus O’Donnell, the cabinet secretary, who conveyed them to the prime minister in the days leading up to the announcement of the inquiry last week.

A Downing Street spokesman last night said: “We have always been clear that we consulted a number of people before announcing the commencement of the inquiry, including former government figures. We are not going to get into the nature of those discussions.”

Blair is believed to have been alarmed by the prospect of giving evidence in public and under oath about the use of intelligence and about his numerous private discussions with US President George Bush over plans for war. A spokesman for the former Labour leader would only say last night: “This was a decision for the current prime minister, not for Tony Blair.”

The Observer reveals today that six weeks before the war, at a meeting in Washington, the two leaders were forced to contemplate alternative scenarios that might trigger a second UN resolution legitimising military action.

Bush told Blair that the US had drawn up a provocative plan “to fly U-2 reconnaissance aircraft, painted in UN colours, over Iraq with fighter cover”. Bush said that if Saddam fired at the planes, he would put Iraq in breach of UN resolutions and legitimise military action.

Last night, Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democrat leader, whose party opposed the war from the outset, said: “If this is true about Blair demanding secrecy, it is outrageous that an inquiry into the biggest foreign policy disaster since Suez is being muzzled to suit the individual needs of the man who took us to war.”

Brown provoked uproar in the Commons on Monday when he announced the inquiry’s scope, membership and remit. Following protests from military leaders and mandarins, including former cabinet secretary Lord Butler, he announced a partial retreat on Thursday, asking the inquiry chairman, Sir John Chilcot, to consider opening a few sessions to the public.

But the move did not ease pressure for a total climbdown. Last night, Brown appeared cornered as MPs of all parties prepared for a Commons debate on Wednesday in which they look certain to back calls for the inquiry to hold sessions in public “whenever possible”.

A Tory motion likely to win wide cross-party backing also calls for the committee to include military experts. The Lib Dems are demanding that it also include constitutional and legal experts to assess the legality of the invasion.

In a sign that the government is preparing to retreat, Chilcot is to meet both Clegg and the Conservative leader, David Cameron, on Tuesday, before the debate. MPs believe that he may then announce a bigger public element to the inquiry in order to avoid the humiliation for Brown of defeat in the Commons.

Chilcot will come under pressure from both leaders to open up the inquiry. Clegg wants a guarantee that witnesses such as Blair will give evidence under oath, while Cameron will ask if the committee can issue an interim report early next year, ahead of a likely spring election.

The Tories say that if Brown does not order a U-turn, an incoming Conservative government will “reserve the right” to widen the scope of the inquiry and increase its powers where necessary after an election.

Sir Christopher Meyer, who was the British ambassador in Washington in the run-up to the war and is likely to be called to give evidence to the inquiry, yesterday backed calls to make it public. “It should be open,” he said. “I think it should also have powers of subpoena and people should give evidence on oath. I would be perfectly comfortable with that.”

He said the case for openness was increased because there had been “a ton of stuff” published in the US, both via official inquiries and in memoirs written by key players, making public what had previously been confidential. “I would be perfectly happy for the whole embassy archive in Washington [to be disclosed],” he added. “I haven’t got a problem with that being made available. Things were very sensitive then, but this is 2009.”

In a letter to the Observer, a group of current and former Labour MPs, headed by Alan Simpson, the chairman of Labour Against the War, demands a complete rethink. “Neither the public nor parliament will understand how the prime minister’s ‘new era of openness’ can begin with an Iraq inquiry held behind closed doors,” says the letter.

From British daily The Independent:

Blair demanded: Hold Iraq inquiry in secret

Critics say Tony Blair’s hopes of becoming the EU president risk being scuppered if the investigation is held in public

Inquiry into British torture scandal? Here.

Oil rush: Scramble for Iraq’s wealth: here.

G4S mercenaries kill Australian Aborigine


This is a music video by British punk band Crass, of their song Securicor (another name for G4S corporation).

By Alex Bainbridge, in Perth, Australia:

Racism kills: Demand justice for Mr Ward

20 June 2009

“I would have been concerned if it was a dog or some other animal who died in those conditions, but since it was only a black-fella …”

This was one comment was made to a campaigner for Aboriginal rights in a discussion of the case of Mr Ward — an Aboriginal elder killed in custody in 2008.

The anecdote was reported to the June 17 meeting of the Deaths in Custody Watch Committee/Justice for Ward campaign. It reveals the level of racism that still exists in sections of Australian society — the same kind racism responsible for Ward’s death in the first place.

Ward’s case is particularly shocking because he was literally cooked to death during a four-hour journey in the back of a prison transport van on a 42ºC day.

The van compartment was metal. It had neither ventilation nor functioning air conditioning. It’s estimated the surface temperatures inside the van would have reached up to 56ºC.

An alternative, yet still secure compartment in the vehicle was available. Yet custodial staff did not place him in it, citing company policy as justification. The staff did not make any check on Ward, or offer a comfort stop during the journey.

There were multiple problems with the so-called bail hearing that led to Ward being taken on the four hour journey from Laverton (957 kilometres north-east of Perth) to Kalgoorlie.

Barrye Thompson, the Justice of the Peace who conducted the bail hearing, had not attended the relevant training and was not aware of his responsibilities.

Police had made two presentations about the case to Thompson without Ward being present. Ward was therefore unable to challenge the police statements — a violation of his right to natural justice.

Most importantly, the bail hearing was held without proper authorisation and in violation of several points of the legislation.

The report by coroner Alastair Hope stated: “a question arises as to whether or not the deceased was lawfully in custody at the time of his death.”

Police ordered the transport van the day before the supposed bail hearing took place. In the words of the coroner’s report, “it would appear to have been taken for granted that the deceased would not be granted bail”.

Racism

This fact is one of several that raise the question of racism. It is difficult to conclude that a white person in the same circumstances would face the same treatment (being held in custody overnight then transported in a sub-standard van for four hours) for a mere traffic violation (drink driving).

Ward had considerable community connections in his home town of Warburton and was a respected elder. Thompson told the coroner that he knew nothing of these connections.

When asked about the same matter by ABC’s Four Corners, he said “No. No. He was an Aboriginal in a very drunken state or very groggy state. That’s all I knew him as.”

This is only one of several instances in which naked racism was revealed by the Four Corners report.

Regarding the vehicle in which Ward was transported, the coroner said “in my view any reasonably compassionate person who viewed the prisoner pod in which the deceased was transported would be shocked by its appearance”.

The coroner wrote: “In my view it is a disgrace that a prisoner in the 21st century, particularly a prisoner who had not been convicted of any crime, was transported for a long distance in high temperatures in this pod.”

Further: “The photographs taken of the pod do not adequately depict its appearance and make it appear larger, brighter and less unpleasant than it was on inspection by the court.”

Clearly, it was racist prejudice from many of the people involved that contributed to this outrage.

This racism comes on top of a general prejudice against prisoners, and a disregard for their human rights.

Privatisation

Another factor that contributed to this outrage was the fact that the “custodial services” were provided by the private corporation Global Solutions Limited — now known as G4S.

On June 15 — 17 months after the event — G4S sacked the two officers who transported Ward. However, they were still using the same fleet of aged prisoner transport vehicles that were the subject of damning reports by the inspector of custodial services in 2001 and then again in 2007.

The 2001 report contained a quote from a prison officer that “the vehicles are not fit for humans to be transported in — we are just waiting for a death to happen”.

Despite this, G4S is trying to shift all the blame on to the individual employees alone.

The June 19 Australian reported that “[G4S director of public affairs Tim] Hall said while the company accepted it had failed in its duty of care, it was the two officers who were responsible for Ward’s death”.

By contrast, the coroner found that G4S and the Department of Corrective Services, as well as the two prison officers, had all contributed to his death.

While the two officers should be held responsible for their negligence, the big fish in the department and G4S should not be let off the hook for their parts in this crime. In particular, all privatisation of prisons and prisoner transport must be halted and reversed.

Furthermore, the government should immediately implement the recommendations of the 1991 Royal Commission into Black Deaths in Custody to ensure such tragedies never happen again.

Enhanced by Zemanta