Libya, from bloodshed to more bloodshed


This video says about itself:

Women refugees flee Libyan violence

8 March 2011

As the world marks the 100th anniversary of International Women’s Day, euronews went to the Libyan-Tunisian border to meet some of the female migrants who are fleeing the violence in Libya.

By Joseph Kishore in the USA:

US imperialism and the catastrophe in Libya

17 February 2015

This weekend, the Islamic State (ISIS) released a video of the horrific beheadings of 21 Coptic Christian workers seized in the town of Sirte in eastern Libya. This barbaric act was the latest in a series of such killings, including the beheading or immolation of hostages from the US, Britain, Japan and Jordan.

The latest ISIS atrocity has triggered predictable expressions of shock and anger by news anchors and editorialists in the United States, along with further massacres. Within hours of the release of the video, Egypt, led by US-backed dictator General Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, launched a wave of air strikes killing 64 people, including seven civilians.

Washington and its political allies are politically and morally responsible for these atrocities. The Islamist beheadings in Libya are the product of a monumental crime: the 2011 NATO war in Libya to oust the regime of Colonel Muammar Gaddafi.

Prior to the intervention of NATO, there were no sectarian murders of Christians in Libya and Islamist militias tied to Al Qaeda were small groups with no broader influence. These forces were armed and promoted when, in 2011, the Obama administration and its allies in Europe, led by French President Nicolas Sarkozy, took the decision to topple Gaddafi.

The imperialist powers funneled massive amounts of money and weaponry to Islamist militias and Al Qaeda operatives, providing them with air support through a mass bombing campaign that killed tens of thousands of Libyans.

As the World Socialist Web Site wrote at the time: “Far from a ‘revolution’ or struggle for ‘liberation,’ what the world is witnessing is the rape of Libya by a syndicate of imperialist powers determined to lay hold of its oil wealth and turn its territory into a neo-colonial base of operations for further interventions throughout the Middle East and North Africa.”

The disastrous consequences of the rape of Libya are now all too clear to see.

The war culminated in the carpet bombing of Sirte and the torture and murder of Gaddafi, after which then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gloated, “We came, we saw, he died.” Since then, Libya has collapsed into an ever-bloodier civil war between various Islamist factions and rival militias vying for state power. The country has also served as a training ground for CIA-backed Islamist forces preparing to fight the Syrian regime of President Bashar al-Assad.

Less than four years after the war, the American media report on ISIS atrocities in Libya as if US imperialism had nothing to do with them. No one reading the editorial produced Sunday by the New York Times (“What Libya’s Unraveling Means”) would have any inkling of Washington’s role in producing this catastrophe, or the US media’s role in supporting the operation. One of the key figures in the war, the late US Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens, who was killed in an Islamist raid in Benghazi after the war, was himself a friend of many Times journalists.

The Times worries that “this oil-rich nation [is veering] towards complete chaos,” and that “the growth and radicalization of Islamist groups raise the possibility that large parts of Libya could become a satellite of the Islamic State.” It manages to describe the conflict that led to Gaddafi’s ouster simply as a “civil war,” without even mentioning NATO’s six-month bombing of Libya.

ISIS is now strongest precisely where Washington has intervened most aggressively. Another article published in the Times over the weekend warns, “The Islamic State is expanding beyond its base in Syria and Iraq to establish military affiliates in Afghanistan, Algeria, Egypt and Libya.” The Times does not mention that the US has invaded or financed Islamist proxy wars in four of the six countries mentioned: Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya.

The world is now witnessing the consequences of the recklessness, brutality, greed and limitless stupidity of Washington and its NATO allies.

Responsibility for the disaster in Libya lies squarely with former French President Nicolas Sarkozy, the initial champion of a NATO war in Libya; President Obama, whose administration provided the bulk of the firepower that shattered Libya’s armed forces and its major cities; and the NATO allied powers that joined in this murderous adventure.

What is unfolding across the Middle East today is an indictment of imperialism, its ruling elites, its political servants and its lying media.

Britain: David Cameron’s ‘free Libya’ is no-go area, Foreign Office says: here.

LIBYA: ISIS‘ NEW HOME BASE “The beheading of 21 Egyptian Christians by Islamic State followers has finally drawn the global spotlight to the group’s rising clout in Libya, which not long ago was touted as a successful example of Western intervention. The killings prompted Egyptian airstrikes on Islamic State strongholds in Libya and spurred calls for more active international involvement in what is fast becoming a failed state on Europe’s doorstep.” [WSJ]

Egypt’s Sisi becomes ‘key anti-IS ally’ after Libya raids. Egyptian strikes against IS in Libya likely to improve Cairo’s ties with US, as human rights ‘take a back seat’, say experts: here.

Thousands of migrants nearly die in a week trying to reach Italy from Libya: here.

Advertisements

27 thoughts on “Libya, from bloodshed to more bloodshed

  1. The colonist powers having developed or over developed their infrastructure and military, how many bombs do the powers need? the only work these powers can engage in is the destruction of the third world, when the individual of Western culture has become well educated the only fun thing left is to open ones peacock feathers to the less well educated for kicks on Highway 66.

  2. Pingback: Libya war based on lies | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: Lies about NATO’s ‘humanitarian’ Libya war exposed | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: Terrorists in Tunisia trained in ‘new’ Libya | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: Libya’s oil war kills civilians | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: ‘British voters, stop Cameron’s warmongering on Syria’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: Iraq, Libya, Syria wars and British governments | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: British government loves wars, hates refugees from those wars | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: Libyan warlords kill, injure Turkish sailors | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: ISIS’ weapons from the USA | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: Stop European Union anti-refugee policies | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: British bombs on Syria will help ISIS | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: Military bases, neocolonialism get out of Africa, film | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  14. Pingback: More Libyan blood for more Libyan oil? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  15. Pingback: British government attacks war graves workers | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  16. Pingback: Paris, San Bernardino crimes abused for warmongering | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  17. Pingback: Libya, ISIS, the USA and its allies | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  18. Pingback: British illegal wars in Yemen, Syria, Iraq, Libya | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  19. Pingback: Drowning refugees fleeing ‘humanitarian’ wars | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  20. Pingback: The Arab world, from Bush’s Iraq war to ISIS | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  21. Pingback: Hillary Clinton and British Blairism | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  22. Pingback: Italian neo-colonial war in Libya, after Mussolini and Berlusconi | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  23. Pingback: Libya worse off than ever, Dutch ambassador says | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  24. Pingback: Which Libyan government kills refugees? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  25. Pingback: Libyan gunmen drive Doctors Without Borders refugee rescuers away | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  26. Pingback: Mali war US ammunition kills Dutch soldiers | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  27. Pingback: Dutch soldiers’ union questions neocolonial Mali war | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s