Big Oil fat cats grab at Libya

This video from the USA is called Libya: Bill Van Auken – Ex-US presidential candidate: “NATO in Libya for oil”.

By Patrick O’Connor:

US, European corporations rush to secure cut from Libyan war

26 September 2011

Backed by the US and European governments that have spearheaded the military intervention into Libya, transnational corporations are now scrambling to secure lucrative oil deals, construction contracts, export opportunities and other profit-making openings in the war-ravaged North African state.

The New York Times last Thursday reported that the returned US ambassador to Libya, Gene Cretz, had briefed reporters following a ceremonial flag-raising at the reopened embassy in Tripoli. Cretz explained that about a week after the so-called rebel fighters had won control of the Libyan capital, he participated in a State Department conference call involving executives from about 150 American companies interested in the new opportunities created by the NATO-led bombardment.

“We know that oil is the jewel in the crown of Libyan natural resources,” Cretz reportedly later explained to journalists, “but even in Qaddafi’s time they were starting from A to Z in terms of building infrastructure and other things … If we can get American companies here on a fairly big scale, which we will try to do everything we can to do that, then this will redound to improve the situation in the United States with respect to our own jobs.”

Cretz’s claim that “jobs” will be generated through Libyan contracts is absurd—the real purpose of getting “American companies here on a fairly big scale” is to generate profits. The ambassador’s remarks again point to the nakedly colonial character of the US-NATO regime-change operation in Libya. From the outset, the intervention was bound up with the imperialist powers’ geo-strategic calculations across North Africa and their economic interests in Libya’s oil-rich territory.

The New York Times report on Cretz’s statement noted that it was “a rare nod to the tacit economic stakes in the Libyan conflict for the United States and other Western countries.” After reporting the ambassador’s claim that oil was never the “predominant reason” for the intervention, the Times nevertheless admitted that “his comments underlined the American eagerness for a cut of any potential profits.”

The September 15 visit to Tripoli by British Prime Minister David Cameron and French President Nicolas Sarkozy pointed to the intensified scramble among the NATO allies for control of Libya’s natural resources.

A week before Sarkozy went to Libya, Medef International, which represents the interests of French companies overseas, convened a conference titled, “The National Transitional Council and its Projects.” The event was attended by about 400 senior executives from firms including oil company Total, energy firm GDF Suez and car producer Peugeot, as well as what Reuters described as other “top names in the Paris CAC-40, law firms, architects, the postal service, wheat companies, printers, tobacco firms, and insurance firms.” French Trade Minister Pierre Lellouche attended, together with a representative of the NTC.

Italian energy transnational Eni reported today its resumption of oil production in Libya for the first time since Nato began bombing the country in March: here.

Corporate Tyranny & Big Oil’s Lies: here.

Britain’s involvement in the Nato bombing of Libya has cost taxpayers an estimated £1.75 billion – seven times more than what the government has admitted to: here.

Britain: Sailors who took part in the Libya campaign will be among hundreds of Royal Navy personnel to learn they are being made redundant later this week: here.

49 thoughts on “Big Oil fat cats grab at Libya

  1. Special Report: How to win business in Libya

    By Emma Farge, Lorraine Turner and John Irish

    BENGHAZI, Libya | Fri Sep 23, 2011 5:22am EDT

    (Reuters) – In August, as rebels fought forces loyal to President Muammar Gaddafi, two representatives of a British business consortium took a “rather long and arduous ferry journey from Malta” to the North African country.

    “To describe it as a ferry would be very polite,” according to an executive at a London-based global engineering company, whose interests the two men represented. “I think it was a trawler.”

    The men traveled to Libya at the invitation of the rebel administration. Britain, along with France and the United States, had given political and military support for the uprising against Gaddafi and sponsored the rebel leadership, the National Transitional Council (NTC). This was a chance to close some deals.

    “We had people on the ground in Misrata,” said the businessman, who spoke by phone on condition of anonymity. “You could still hear ordnance from the center of Misrata, so it was very much an ongoing situation. But they were already talking about training and equipping fire brigades, training and equipping police.”

    The visitors keep coming. In the lobby of the Tibesti Hotel in the rebel stronghold of Benghazi, opportunists mix with diplomats, journalists and aid workers. With NATO’s help, the rebels have deposed Gaddafi and now control Tripoli, the capital. Elsewhere fierce fighting continues and Gaddafi remains holed up. The country has yet to pay its workers, write a new constitution or even name a transitional government. But it is a land with deep pockets, and plenty of new friends.

    French President Nicolas Sarkozy and British Prime Minister David Cameron received a heroes’ welcome last week when they became the first western leaders to visit since Gaddafi’s ouster. Interim leader Abdel Jalil said the rebels’ allies could expect preferential treatment in return for their help.

    It was a clear signal that countries which had not backed the NATO bombing campaign, including Russia, China and Germany, or which were slow to denounce Gaddafi, like Italy, stand to lose out.

    But if French and British politicians are tallying up the contracts, business executives are leaving little to chance. Foreign companies withdrew from Libya at the outset of the NATO bombing campaign; sanctions imposed on Gaddafi’s regime since February have added to the difficulty of doing business.

    Despite this, dozens of executives from France, Britain, Italy and other countries have spent months building ties with potential Libyan partners. In a country fractured by tribe and politics, they say it is relationships that will prove decisive.

    The potential profits are huge. While there are pockets of damage to infrastructure and former Gaddafi command centers, the country is in far better shape than Iraq was after the fall of Saddam. At the same time, Libya needs new investment in everything from schools to services. According to the French business federation, Libya should offer around $200 billion in investment opportunities over the next 10 years. With a population of just over 6 million and Africa’s largest oil reserves, it has plenty to spend. Up to $170 billion worth of frozen Gaddafi-era assets alone should help pay for reconstruction.

    Here’s how companies are playing this new front in the latest scramble for Africa.


    Western firms, including trading houses Vitol, Trafigura and Gunvor have already been busy. A London-based team for Vitol sold oil products to the rebels in large volumes as early as April, and helped ship their first crude oil cargo. Trafigura expressed interest, although it is not clear if any deals were concluded.

    France landed executives in Benghazi in June and July, according to Michel Casals, head of the Franco-Libyan Chamber of Commerce.

    “There’s no point going when people are not ready, but we can’t go in six months when everybody has already been there,” says Thierry Courtaigne, director general of French business lobby Medef International, which represents the interests of France’s top companies overseas.

    At the same time, some firms remain wary of doing business with the rebels in case they break international sanctions. Though those sanctions are now easing — Europe and the United Nations have eased theirs — U.S. firms in particular are hesitant. One engineering executive expressed optimism about the potential in Libya “once things get going” and said he has been attempting to rekindle old relationships. But he, along with another U.S. company official, said sanctions left them unsure about how much they can do. Many told Reuters they are waiting for guidance from Washington.


    There are ways to work as you wait. These include employing free agents known as “fixers,” who offer on-the-ground intelligence, security, networking, and deniability in case of a legal challenge. Often former British military men, fixers are widely used by companies in resource-rich countries with weak governments. In Libya you can find a small community of them in hotels like the Tibesti — Benghazi’s main networking hub.

    One of their number is a former senior officer in Britain’s SAS special forces. In his early 60s and with a mane of salt-and-pepper hair, John Holmes is often seen with two other men at the Tibesti. He spends much of his time in the lobby, trying to catch the ear of NTC officials who could help open doors in the oil sector.

    NTC officials say Holmes is working on behalf of British firm Heritage Oil, trying to finance field security and maintenance work in return for a stake in the country’s oil production. He refused to talk to Reuters, describing himself as a private person. Heritage also declined to comment on whether the firm had hired him. “They’ve been very aggressive, going out on a limb,” said one rival.

    Others are more approachable, but still decline to be identified or say who they are working for because of the sensitive nature of their work. Many fixers are fresh from similar assignments in Iraq. One, dressed in desert camouflage and smoking British Lambert & Butler cigarettes, was responsible for liaising with local Iraqis. He doesn’t speak Arabic but says he has a mantra for life: have respect, be courteous and don’t promise something you can’t deliver.

    The job includes giving clients a flavor of local conditions and pinpointing opportunities. In one memo sent by a fixer and seen by Reuters, the author details meetings with Libyan officials and discusses a strategy for gaining access to remote oil facilities to check out the wartime damage. Such information could be priceless to oil companies weighing Libya’s still-considerable risks against the huge potential rewards.


    Political support can help with access, and with the law. Sarkozy has hotly denied talk of “under the table deals for Libya’s riches”, including reports that in return for French help, oil group Total will be given preferential access to Libyan oil. Nonetheless, Paris has been frank about the payback it expects in return for spearheading NATO’s mission.

    “The President took political and military risks, and all that creates an environment where the Libyan authorities and the people know what debt they owe France,” French Trade minister Pierre Lellouche told a September 6 symposium on the NTC arranged by the Franco-Libyan chamber of commerce. “We aren’t going to get embarrassed by helping our companies benefit from this advantage.”

    In April, when Vitol shipped out rebel-produced oil, it had backing from the office of British Foreign Secretary William Hague, oil and diplomatic sources say.

    A special group referred to by UK media as a secret oil cell, backed by British Prime Minister David Cameron, was staffed by a handful of officials and supported by Britain’s MI6 secret intelligence service, a diplomatic source said.

    A European diplomatic source told Reuters members of the unit are also involved with smoothing the way for major oil companies to get back into Libya. The firms need advice on security, who to speak to and the life expectancy of the new administration, the person said.

    A UK government spokesperson contacted for this report confirmed the oil cell’s existence.

    “Oil was central to Gaddafi’s war machine,” the spokesperson said in a statement. “Disrupting the supply and constricting his ability to raise revenue through sales hindered his ability to brutalize Libyan civilians. The Oil Cell also worked on how to support the resumption of the Libyan energy sector post-conflict and fed into broad planning, given the importance of this in providing a sustainable revenue source and meeting Libya’s own fuel needs.”

    Asked about the government’s cooperation with Vitol, the spokesperson said: “The UK policy supported the supply of fuel to the NTC. The oil cell provided the same information on supply of fuel to a broad range of companies, but advised them to take their own independent legal advice on whether any activities would be contrary to any applicable laws.”

    Other companies have since moved in, but Vitol alone is estimated to have supplied around 20-25 shipments, mainly of diesel over the past two months, according to a Reuters survey of industry sources, primarily sources in the shipping industry. The total bill for the fuels Vitol has delivered exceeds $1 billion, NTC sources say.


    For Italian oil and gas group Eni, Libya’s biggest foreign oil operator, Silvio Berlusconi has been less of an asset. The Italian Prime Minister’s friendship with Gaddafi meant Rome switched allegiance to the rebels much later than other western capitals. Berlusconi said turning on his old friend made him feel “very bad”.

    “April was a critical time and Eni wasn’t there from the beginning. Oil and politics are mixed,” said a source at Benghazi-based oil firm Agoco. “If we have two companies, Chinese or French, of course we choose the French. When the revolution started the Italians thought Gaddafi would win. They made a bad calculation.”

    Eni has since made regular contact with the NTC, hoping its dominant position in Libyan oil production makes it indispensable, at least in the short term, says a person familiar with the company and its thinking. Italy’s foreign minister Franco Frattini says he recently met rebel leader Mahmoud Jibril, and expects him to visit Italy soon.

    Eni’s chief executive joined top oil officials for a beachfront lunch in Benghazi in August and Nuri Berruien, the chairman of Libya’s National Oil Corporation, told Reuters the two firms had installed a “floating hotel” to provide accommodation for workers on an offshore gas field.

    Russian firms face a similar bind. Moscow was highly critical of the west’s backing for the rebels and only recognized the NTC as Libya’s legitimate authority a few weeks ago. In August, Russia called a French arms drop a “crude violation” of the U.N. weapons embargo.

    State arms exporter Rosoboronexport, previously a major supplier to Gaddafi, has estimated its losses as a result of the change of regime at $4 billion. The chairman of the Russia-Libya business council described the fall of Gaddafi as a disaster for Russian business interests, which extend into infrastructure projects and energy.

    But by the end of August — before Moscow had recognized the NTC — Russian refined products had already been sent to Libya through Swiss-based trading house Gunvor, co-founded by Russian businessman Gennady Timchenko, according to market sources.

    State-controlled gas export monopoly Gazprom, meanwhile, last week signed an option with Eni giving the Russian firm the right to acquire half of Eni’s 33 percent stake in the Elefant oilfield in Libya, Gazprom sources said. That option essentially keeps Gazprom’s oil arm in the game until the fighting ends.


    China recognized the NTC last week. In March, it stopped short of using its U.N. Security Council veto power to block the NATO bombing campaign, but condemned the expansion of strikes and repeatedly urged both sides to compromise.

    After Gaddafi fled Tripoli earlier this month, reporters found documents indicating that state-owned Chinese arms companies had offered to sell rocket launchers, anti-tank missiles and other arms worth a total of some $200 million to Gaddafi’s forces, despite the U.N. ban on such sales. (The documents also showed the United States and Britain had helped Gaddafi persecute dissidents.) Beijing said the companies had gone behind its back and the arms were never shipped.

    Yet Chinese companies, like many U.S. firms, say they are waiting for the green light from their government to return to Libya, where the country’s construction industry had been heavily involved building railways, water plants and communication facilities. Before the conflict, China State Construction Engineering Corp and China Metallurgy Group were building 25,000 government-subsidized affordable apartments.

    “The government pulled all of us back and now we would be looking out for the government’s leadership for moving us back,” said an official at a Chinese state firm with investments in Libya.

    Another executive at a major Chinese energy firm is concerned that China’s policy of non-intervention in the affairs of other countries may increasingly conflict with the country’s economic interests. “If you have enough business interest to protect, you should take greater responsibility as a major economic power,” the executive told Reuters.

    According to one European envoy, the NTC’s Minister of Transport and Communications is receiving daily calls and emails from the Chinese.


    If Chinese companies are frustrated at missing out in Libya, at least they aren’t there to see the French move in. Casals of the Franco-Libyan Chamber of Commerce says about 20-30 French companies were involved in fact-finding missions to Benghazi in June and July. Earlier this month he said he would soon be traveling to the country “as a sort of boy scout”.

    In the Gaddafi era, just under 50 French firms operated in Libya. In early September, when Paris hosted a symposium about the NTC for entrepreneurs, about 400 executives attended, rushing in and out with briefcases and notepads at the ready.

    Attendees included an A-Z of the top names in the Paris CAC-40, law firms, architects, the postal service, wheat companies, printers, tobacco firms, and insurance firms. The meeting, organized by the Franco-Libyan chamber of commerce, was described by Courtaigne, the business lobbyist, as “focused and extremely studious”.

    Jean-Jacques Royant, head of international cooperation at GEP, a lobby for French oil and gas services companies, said foreign trade minister Lellouche had told them that the big energy players should take the smaller ones under their wings to help them win contracts. Sarkozy may be pleased with his efforts, but no one is taking anything for granted.

    “I don’t believe in favoritism,” Royant said. “There will be a reality on the ground. There are needs and then there will be companies that are better placed than others to service these needs. … We have a lot of work ahead to rebuild our networks and address books.”


    There are sure to be further shifts in Libya’s political landscape. “We are making it very clear that these are commercial deals — you do this, this and this and then goodbye. We are a transitional council and we cannot make decisions that last,” said one NTC source.

    Little wonder companies are spreading their bets wide. “If someone’s head office has been shelled, if it’s someone you’ve been working for in the past, you might just want to get in there and do a bit of hard marketing and fix something for them in terms of the fabric of the building and get close to them again and get talking,” said the chief executive of one British building firm.

    “It’s going to be close relationships and contacts in an environment like that that gets you work … If you’ve got close relationships, you’re going to be months ahead.”

    French telecoms firm Alcatel-Lucent and drugs company Sanofi are already working on the cellphone network and donating drugs;

    France has promised cabins so students can begin school and the NTC has signed contracts with a French grain firm for wheat worth $22 million.

    Whatever the politics, real connections will be decisive. Easy to rekindle and hard to erase, they clinch deals that high-level diplomacy can only help set up. The British business representatives who traveled by trawler to Misrata were “hugely well received,” said the engineering executive in London. “They were invited to go because of the relationships we’ve established in Libya.”

    Antoine Sivan, France’s envoy to Benghazi, puts it this way: “France is going through a love story here. To the French entrepreneurs who come and meet me, I say: ‘They (the NTC) so far don’t have any money so do not expect to sign a contract right away, but put your foot in the door. Trust them.'”

    Trust is priceless in any society. In Libya, it is lost at your peril. The country’s small population makes for a very close society, says a person in the Libyan oil industry.

    “Six degrees of separation in Libya is more like 1.3,” said the person, who spoke on condition of anonymity. “There’s a certain bedouin culture where it takes time to build up trust and, once you have it, you risk being burned if you mess it up.

    “People are so interconnected that any Libyan on the street will be somehow connected to five members of the NTC.”

    (Emma Farge reported from Benghazi; Lorraine Turner from London and John Irish from Paris. Additional reporting by Mohammed Abbas and Alex Dziadosz in Libya; Sarah Young, Keith Weir and Barbara Lewis in London; Marie Maitre and Caroline Jacobs in Paris; Stephen Jewkes in Milan; Andrew Quinn in Washington D.C.; Aizhu Chen and Su Dan in Beijing; Nick Zieminski in New York and Braden Reddall in San Francisco. Writing by Paul Hoskins; Edited by Sara Ledwith, Christopher Johnson and Simon Robinson)


  2. Pingback: John McCain, from Gadaffi crony to Libyan warmonger | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: Libya war, poem by Attila the Stockbroker | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: Gadaffi’s illegal execution, by Arnon Grunberg | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: Shell grab at Libyan oil | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: British fat cats’ Libyan war profits | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: Libyan fundamentalists kill US ambassador | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: Libyan NATO allies kill US diplomats | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: USA-Middle East, not just one film provocation | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: British mercenaries failed protecting US Libya consulate | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: Libyan US ambassador murder, what politicians forget | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: US, French soldiers invade Central African Republic | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: World War I should not be celebrated | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  14. Pingback: Libya coup, chaos and CIA | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  15. Pingback: Libya back to monarchy? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  16. Pingback: ‘Humanitarian’ wars really oil wars, new study | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  17. Pingback: Italian colonial war in Libya, yet again? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  18. Pingback: Libya, revolution and counter-revolutionary bloody war | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  19. Pingback: Libya, from bloodshed to more bloodshed | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  20. Pingback: Lies about NATO’s ‘humanitarian’ Libya war exposed | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  21. Pingback: British poetess Clare Saponia about her new book | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  22. Pingback: Libya war causes refugee tragedies, pretext for new oil war? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  23. Pingback: British bombs on Syria will help ISIS | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  24. Pingback: More Libyan blood for more Libyan oil? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  25. Pingback: French soldiers killed in Libya | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  26. Pingback: Italian neo-colonial war in Libya, after Mussolini and Berlusconi | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  27. Pingback: David Cameron’s disastrous Libya war exposed | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  28. Pingback: Britain’s Cameron’s Libya war, parody song | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  29. Pingback: Libya, Benghazi murders, mercenaries and oil scandal | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  30. Pingback: German government supports Ethiopian dictatorship | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  31. Pingback: Libya worse off than ever, Dutch ambassador says | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  32. Pingback: Spanish, British conservative sabre rattling on Gibraltar | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  33. Pingback: NATO’s ‘new’ Libya bloodbath of civilians, militia men | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  34. Pingback: From NATO’s Libya war to Manchester terror | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  35. Pingback: Spanish opposition to Rajoy’s violence, not only in Catalonia | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  36. Pingback: ‘Indict Libyan slave traders at International Criminal Court’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  37. Pingback: Slavery in Libya, more protests | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  38. Pingback: Close Libyan torture and slavery jails, Dutch government says | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  39. Pingback: Donald Trump’s coup for Venezuelan oil | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  40. Pingback: French-Italian conflict on Libyan oil | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  41. Pingback: French-Italian oil war in Libya | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  42. Pingback: Bloodshed in Libya escalating | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  43. Pingback: Another ‘humanitarian’ oil bloodbath in Libya | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  44. Pingback: Bloodbath in Libya, a British view | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  45. Pingback: Libya, yet more bloodbaths threaten | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  46. Pingback: Bloody Italian-French proxy oil war in Libya | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  47. Pingback: ‘Leftist’ Achcar advising British neo-colonial warriors | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  48. Pingback: More Donald Trump oil war in Syria | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  49. Pingback: Hillary Clinton parody music video | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.