Britain and the Afghan war, 2003-2014

This video from Britain is called Kate Hudson, CND: The War on Terror Today; Confronting War Ten Years On 09 02 13.

From daily The Independent in Britain:

Kate Hudson

Tuesday 28 October 2014

However you spin it, the story of British intervention in Afghanistan is a tragedy

In the thirteen years of our military involvement, tens of thousands of innocent civilians were killed and the lives of 453 British troops were lost

It’s strange how 13 years after we went to war on Afghanistan, the actual reasons for doing so seem to be almost entirely obscured. ‘Leaving the country in better shape’ seems a favourite – if anodyne – description, or perhaps making it ‘more stable’. Beyond that, we have assisting in nation-building, tackling the drugs trade, improving gender equality… the list of constructive and humanitarian-sounding tasks is a long one.

Does anyone now remember or refer to the actually stated reason – the War on Terror – declared by President Bush in the days following the 9/11 attacks on the United States? The war on Afghanistan was its first manifestation, inflicted on the people of Afghanistan by Bush and Blair on 7 October 2001. This was Operation Enduring Freedom – launched on the grounds that the Taliban government refused to hand over Osama bin Laden and other al-Qaeda operatives.

The stated goal was to continue the War on Terror until every terrorist group had been found, stopped and defeated. Whilst this goal may have found emotional resonance with many shocked by the terrible attacks on innocent civilians there were also many at the time who argued against the collective punishment of an entire people because of the actions of a foreign-originated terrorist cell. Tens of thousands of innocent civilians have died as a result.

But the arguments made for alternative courses of action to bring the criminals to book fell on deaf ears. And though targeted alternatives were derided at the time, Bin Laden was eventually killed in Pakistan in 2011 by a team of US navy seals.

This was not so surprising as it turned out, for as time passed it became clear that the US had actually decided to overthrow the Taliban before the 9/11 attacks and spoke of regime change in other countries too. The tragedy of 9/11 was an opportunity to bring about the change in the region that the Bush administration sought. In that context, the illegal war on Iraq – following hard on the heels of Afghanistan – was made all of a piece in Bush and Blair’s War on Terror narrative. Many at the time rightly observed that there was no al-Qaeda in Iraq but that war would be the midwife of terrorism there. Over a decade on, that couldn’t be clearer as the region is engulfed in catastrophic and brutal conflict and attendant humanitarian crises. The shocking and seemingly unstoppable events of the last months are indeed part of the legacy of that opportunist and disastrous ‘War on Terror’.

The rebranding began some years ago. In April 2007, the British government announced that it was no longer using the term ‘War on Terror’. President Obama abandoned it in favour of ‘Overseas Contingency Operation’ as he sought to distance himself from the most extreme and unpopular policies of his predecessor, without making significant changes to the policy direction. In Britain, the shift was not surprising given the shattering impact of popular opposition to Blair’s War on Terror at home. The consequences of Blair’s lies continue to reverberate around the corridors of power and they have reshaped the politics and practice of military intervention for a generation.

In the meantime, the way we talk about our military intervention in Afghanistan has gone through a number of rationalisations. But whether we were supposed to be there to counter terrorism, to help the Afghans build a new society and democratic infrastructure, to support and advance the rights and opportunities of women and girls, or to tackle the drugs trade as it re-emerged post-Taliban, the reality is, we weren’t equipped for any of it and we just shouldn’t have been there.

In the thirteen years of our military involvement in Afghanistan, the sorry truth is that tens of thousands of innocent civilians were killed and the lives of 453 British troops were lost. Opium production is at record levels, providing around 90% of global supply. There has indeed been a rise in women’s rights – around 3 million girls now attend school – but these advances have been offset by a rise in gender specific violence including rape and acid attacks. These results have cost us anything between £20-£40 billion.

Whatever the narrative, however you describe it, the story of British intervention in Afghanistan is a tragedy – for our troops whose lives have been lost needlessly and for the people of Afghanistan who once again have to start rebuilding their lives. Let us hope that the lessons will be learned.

Right-of-centre ideology has lost us the war in Afghanistan and much more besides. The ignominious retreat from Afghanistan is emblematic of a wider malaise that is afflicting Britain today: here.

General John Campbell, who assumed command in August of the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) that is occupying Afghanistan, suggested this week that he may request more troops remain in the country than is presently scheduled: here.

On September 29th, power in Afghanistan changed hands for the first time in 13 years. At the Arg, the presidential palace in Kabul, Ashraf Ghani was sworn in as president, while the outgoing Hamid Karzai watched calmly from a front-row seat. Washington, congratulating itself on this “peaceful transition,” quickly collected the new president’s autograph on a bilateral security agreement that assures the presence of American forces in Afghanistan for at least another decade. The big news of the day: the U.S. got what it wanted. (Precisely why Americans should rejoice that our soldiers will stay in Afghanistan for another 10 years is never explained.): here.

NATO’s International Security Assistance Force’s (ISAF) Joint Command, which has overseen the 13-year-long US-led war in Afghanistan, formally ceased operations in Kabul Monday amid declarations that the combat role for American and allied troops has ended. The flag-lowering ceremony, however, was eclipsed by announcements and decisions from Washington making it clear that the active US military intervention in the impoverished country is continuing and plans for the drawdown of American forces are being revised accordingly: here.

German Defence Minister Ursula von der Leyen warned against an “abrupt withdrawal” of NATO forces from Afghanistan: here.

On December 28, the US-led International Security Assistance Force, or ISAF, formally ended its combat operations in Afghanistan. President Barack Obama issued a statement declaring the step “a milestone for our country,” adding, “the longest war in American history is coming to a responsible conclusion.” Like virtually everything else that comes out of the American president’s mouth, this is a lie. The shabby little ceremony in Kabul Sunday, in which a US commander hauled down one battle flag and ran up another, only confirmed that the murderous 13-year US war in Afghanistan continues: here.

WHITE HOUSE CONSIDERS SLOWER AFGHANISTAN WITHDRAWAL PLAN “The Obama administration is considering slowing its planned withdrawal from Afghanistan for the second time, according to U.S. officials, a sign of the significant security challenges that remain despite an end to the U.S. and NATO combat mission there.” [WaPo]

31 thoughts on “Britain and the Afghan war, 2003-2014

  1. On 4 Corners, Australian, TV, the documentary, is about green on blue, attacks some Australian, soldiers attacked from inside, the program on the assassination, by a Afghanistan man, who was interviewed, stated he killed because of the Koran being desecrated, can the Western allies, not understand the culture runs deep for these people? the Western Allies are seen in Afghanistan as invading there country, I have no sympathy for those who join military forces, and cannot get it, as to being indoctrinated themselves and putting their own lives at risk, this is all part of colonization, never mind the glory of coming home in a box with colors and the medals, whether you are in the institute of military or not you are all part of the machine to kill and thus murder.


  2. Pingback: British veterans for peace | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: Dutch Islamophobic newspaper ‘news’ turns out to be lies | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: German military-industrial complex prepares civil war | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: Spanish government wants more money for wars | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: Wars and London art exhibition | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: Hundreds mourn 12-year-old boy killed by Cleveland police | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: Word War I Christmas truce, and peace today | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: Innocent Afghan prisoners leave Guantánamo torture camp after twelve years | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: Bryan Adams’ photos of disabled military veterans | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: Bloody oil war in Libya | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: Afghan wedding guests killed again | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: Pentagon wars in scores of countries | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  14. Pingback: Terrorist atrocity in Paris, pretext for more violence and oppression | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  15. Pingback: British government sabotages Iraq war report | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  16. Pingback: Photo exhibition about wars in London | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  17. Pingback: Anti-war comics about World War I | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  18. Pingback: Terrorism in Europe, blowback from neo-colonial wars | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  19. Pingback: Yemen at war, comment from Britain | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  20. Pingback: Libya, from bloodshed to more bloodshed | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  21. Pingback: Scottish general MacDonald killed by homophobia | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  22. Pingback: British Labour party, Libya, refugees, nuclear weapons | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  23. Pingback: New British ‘equalities’ minister supports LGBTQ inequality | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  24. Pingback: Stop British government’s anti-refugee policies | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  25. Pingback: 7-year-old Afghan refugee boy saves fifteen lives | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  26. Pingback: Tony Blair prefers Conservatives to Labour | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  27. Pingback: British Blairite anti-Corbyn putschists help Conservatives, UKIP | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  28. Pingback: British dead soldiers’ families boycott Iraq war report | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  29. Pingback: British corrupt Conservative Liam Fox’s anti-Labour ‘spy’ smears | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  30. Pingback: ‘More British money for militarism, less for poor people’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  31. Pingback: British army child soldiers recruitment | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.