Terrorism, open letter to French President


This 16 November video from the USA is called American Ahmadiyya Muslims condemn Paris Shooting.

From Flandersnews.be in Belgium:

President Hollande, you’ve got mail from Brussels!

Mon 16/11/2015 – 14:27 David Van Reybrouck; translation: Colin Clapson

The celebrated Flemish author David Van Reybrouck has written an open letter to President Hollande of France attacking his choice of language during a speech to the French people following Friday’s unprecedented terrorist attacks in Paris.

Dear Mr President,

That was a rather foolhardy choice of words in your speech on Saturday afternoon when you repeatedly spoke of an “act of war” perpetrated by a “terrorist army”. You said:

“What happened in Paris and Saint-Denis is an act of war and faced with war a country must take the appropriate measures. It was an act committed by a terrorist army, Daesh (IS or Isil), against what we are, a free country that speaks with the entire planet, an act of war that was prepared and plan[n]ed from without with support from within that is now the subject of an investigation. It was an act of total barbarity.”

I am in total agreement with those last words, but the rest of your speech is a horrible, nearly word perfect repetition of the words of GW Bush to the US Congress shortly after the 9/11 attacks: “The enemies of freedom have committed an act of war against our country.”

The consequences of those historic words are well known. A head of state qualifying an event as an act of war is obliged to come up with an appropriate response. … This was followed by the totally mad invasion of Iraq, without UN mandate – for the sole reason that the US suspected it possessed weapons of mass destruction.

That was the main pretext, but not the only pretext.

The other pretext were the lies about Iraq supposedly being involved in the 9/11 atrocities in the USA.

The United States Bush’s administration’s third pretext, turning up when the two other pretexts had turned out to be lies, was ‘Saddam Hussein is a dictator violating human rights’.

True in itself, but NOT a pretext for aggressive war violating international law, as:

1. Saddam Hussein committed his worst crimes when he was still an ally of the United States Reagan-Rumsfeld-Cheney administration.

2. Under George W Bush’s occupation of Iraq, human rights violations became even worse than under Saddam.

3. Recently, Iraq warmongers Donald Rumsfeld and Tony Blair both confessed that they had never been in favour of democracy in Iraq and the Middle East; contrary to their March 2003 war propaganda lies.

None were found, but the invasion led to the total destabilisation of the region that we witness to this day. When US troops left the country in 2011 a power vacuum ensued. When civil war broke out in neighbouring Syria shortly afterwards as part of the fallout from the Arab Spring it became clear to all how destabilising America’s military intervention had been. In the North West of a dismembered Iraq and in the East of a Syria shot to bits there was room, next to the Syrian army and the FSA for the establishment of a third, major player: Isil, Isis or IS.

In short, without Bush’s idiotic invasion of Iraq there would never have been any talk of IS. Millions of us demonstrated against the invasion in 2003. I was among them. It was a worldwide protest. We were right. Not that we were able to look twelve years ahead into the future. We were not that clairvoyant. But now we do realise it: what happened in Paris on Friday night is an indirect consequence of the war rhetoric that your colleague Bush employed in September 2001.

And what do you do? How do you respond within 24 hours of the attacks? You use exactly the same terminology that your US counterpart at the time employed. You are making wine from the same barrel.

You walked straight into it, with your eyes open, Mr President. You did it because you could feel the hot breath of Nicolas Sarkozy and Marine Le Pen in your neck. True, you already had a reputation for being a weakling. Elections are on the way on 6 and 13 December, even though these are only regional elections, following the attacks they will be dominated by national security issues. You walked straight into it, because you gave the terrorists what they wanted: a declaration of war. With great pleasure you accepted their invitation for a Jihad. In your attempt to respond in a forthright fashion you are risking an escalation of the spiral of violence. To me this doesn’t seem like a good idea.

You spoke of a “terrorist army”. First of all, no such thing exists. It’s a contradiction in terms. A “terrorist army”, that’s a bit like a bulimic diet. Countries and groups can have armies, when they fail to establish one they can opt for terrorism. This means that they commit incidental actions aimed at a maximum psychological impact instead of a structural, military deployment of power involving geopolitical ambitions.

But an army? Let’s be clear: so far we do not know if the perpetrators are returning Syria fighters or people dispatched from Syria on purpose. We do not know if the attacks were planned in the caliphate or in European suburbs. Even though there are indications for a Syrian master plan (the near coincidence of the attacks in Lebanon and the Russian plane crash), it strikes me that the IS communique came late in the day and hardly contained any elements that had not circulated on the internet. Is this a question of co-ordination or recuperation?

For equal measure, these could be individuals who have simply run amok, probably chiefly French nationals who have returned from Syria where they became experienced in explosives and fire arms and where they were submerged in a totalitarian ideology, crypto-theory and acts of war. They became monsters, but not an army.

The IS communique spoke of locations that had meticulously been chosen, your own services stress the professionalism of the perpetrators. As far as that is concerned you both speak the same language. But the facts beg to differ. The three who went to the Stade de France where you were attending a friendly against Germany seemed amateurs. They clearly wanted to get inside, possibly to launch an attack against your person; it is possible. But whoever blows himself up next to a McDonald’s and only manages to kill one other person is a poor terrorist. People who need three suicide attacks to kill four others, while minutes later a human mass of 80,000 souls sets itself in motion are bunglers. Someone who together with four others wants to exterminate a concert hall but fails to block the emergency exit is no strategic genius. Someone who steps from a car are shoots at unarmed, innocent civilians on pavement cafes isn’t a soldier schooled in tactics, but a coward, a bastard, a loner who has completely gone off the rails and who has aligned his fate with several other completely derailed individuals. It’s a pack of lone wolves.

Your analysis about a “terrorist army” does not hold water. Your term “act of war” is exceptionally biased, even though this bellicose rhetoric has unashamedly also been adopted by the Dutch Premier Mark Rutte in the Netherlands and Belgian Interior Minister Jan Jambon in Belgium. In your attempt to placate your nation you threaten to make the world less safe. In your attempt to use forceful language, you have shown your weakness.

Other forms of firmness to bellicose language do exit. Immediately after the attacks in Norway Prime Minister Stoltenberg unreservedly called for “greater democracy, greater openness and greater participation”. In your speech you spoke of freedom. You should also have pointed to two other values of the French Republic: equality and fraternity. I believe there is greater need of these at this minute than of your questionable war rhetoric.

David Van Reybrouck is the author of the award-winning “Congo. A History”. He is a writer of prose, poetry and drama as well as an essayist.

David Van Reybrouck also wrote Dear rest of the world on the Paris crimes and politicians’reactions to it.

Since the November 13 terror attack in Paris, the neo-fascist National Front (FN) has emerged as the main beneficiary of the law-and-order hysteria and the draconian police-state measures of the Socialist Party (PS) government. It is leading in polls for the regional elections of December 6 and 13: here.

Guests at the Radisson Blu Astrid Hotel in Antwerp because suspicious on Tuesday night and called the police. They thought that one of the hotel’s guests had been acting suspiciously, but the suspicious person turned out to be no one other than the Red Devils’ [Belgian international football team] star Radja Nainggolan: here.

Radja Nainggolan is of Christian Flemish and Christian Indonesian ancestry.

30 thoughts on “Terrorism, open letter to French President

  1. Pingback: US President Trump would treat Muslims like Jews in 1930s Germany | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  2. Pingback: Seven-year-old Texas boy donates piggy bank to vandalised mosque | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: Paris terrorism abused for wars, attacks on civil liberties | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. I maintain my strong belief that the biggest threat to world unity is the press itself. And when a few crazy radicals commit atrocities such as these, the press take the bait and spread more fear and bigotry than they already have. Presidents ought to know better by now, than to retaliate. Time to stop giving these people what they want; if we ignore them for long enough, stop giving them media coverage and stop retaliating, then surely they will disappear back into the cracks in the pavement they emerged from.

    Like

  5. Pingback: Wars help, don’t stop terrorism | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: Cameron, don’t abuse Paris terror for warmongering | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: David Cameron’s fantasy ‘moderate’ Syrian insurgents | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: George W Bush godfather of ISIS, United States general says | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: British Blairite ‘Labourites’ support Cameron’s war on Syria | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: BirdLife at Paris climate conference | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: British government starts another bloody war | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: France, state of emergency forever? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour election victory in England | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  14. Pingback: Dutch air force joining bloody war in Syria? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  15. Pingback: British allies Saudi Arabia’s money to ISIS | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  16. Pingback: Paris, San Bernardino crimes abused for warmongering | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  17. Tuesday 8th December 2015

    posted by Morning Star in World

    FRANCE’S National Front (FN) rode a wave of anti-Muslim hysteria and hatred of austerity to top Sunday’s first round of regional election polls, results showed yesterday.

    The fascist FN boosted its vote by more than 19 per cent to take 28.4 per cent, edging out former president Nicolas Sarkozy’s Republicans on 26.9 per cent.

    The increasingly unpopular Socialists took 23.5 per cent, the Greens 6.8 per cent and the Left Front 4.2 per cent.

    It was the first election since Islamic State-linked terrorists killed 130 people in Paris last month.

    The French Communist Party, part of the Left Front, said the results “confirm the serious social and democratic state of alert in the country.”

    General secretary Pierre Laurent pointed out that more than half the electorate had abstained but warned that the fascist success was down to years of “free-market-fundamentalist policies that have dismantled social solidarity,” a decade of “increasingly authoritarian austerity” and the main parties’ own decision to falsely install the FN as their main electoral competitors as a “foil to preserve their hegemony.”

    http://morningstaronline.co.uk/a-814b-France-Fascists-surf-wave-of-hate#.VmdBOb_iMdU

    Like

  18. Pingback: Charlie Hebdo cartoonist against Islamophobia, bombing Syria | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  19. Pingback: French African Caribbean minister fed up with racist authoritarian prime minister | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  20. Pingback: French people demonstrate for free speech | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  21. Pingback: Refugee and civil liberties news update | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  22. Pingback: Dutch Auschwitz survivor blasts Pegida racists | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  23. Pingback: Brussels atrocities, abused by Trump, Cruz for torture, war propaganda | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  24. Pingback: ‘War on terror’ NOT answer to Brussels atrocities, Belgian says | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  25. Pingback: French workers’ mass anti-austerity fight | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  26. Pingback: London Underground terror and Conservative austerity | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  27. Pingback: Trump to NATO summit, Brussels, 11/12 July? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.