This video from Britain says about itself:
15 November 2015
Christine Tudhope and Mariesha Payne that when they first heard gun shots they thought it was firecrackers and part of the show
The Scottish survivors of the Paris terror attacks first thought the shots were firecrackers and part of the show.
The pair have also spoken out to say that Muslims must not be blamed for the atrocities.
Christine Tudhope, 34, said she initially thought the gunfire was the sound of firecrackers, but then Mariesha Payne, 33, saw bullets hitting the stage.
Speaking to Sky News as they arrived from Paris at Edinburgh Airport they said they thought the bangs were part of the show.
Mariesha said: “People gasped thinking it was part of the show.
“A second round went off, most people ducked, but I just said run, just get out of here.”
The pair hid from the Paris gunmen in a cellar and had to listen to the massacre for three hours.
Now the pair have urged that Islam should not be blamed for the attacks.
Christine said: “It has nothing to do with Islam. It is just mindless terrorism. The Islamic community will condemn this just as much as us.
Mariesha agreed saying: “This is nothing to do with the majority of immigrants.
By Lamiat Sabin in Britain:
Still No Aid for Isis Victims
Saturday 16th January 2016
A SURVIVOR of the Paris shootings was left high and dry yesterday after Westminster suits told her she’d have to wait for compensation — because they still haven’t officially declared the murderous rampage a “terror attack.”
Christine Tudhope, from Fife, and her friend Mariesha Payne were enjoying the Eagles of Death Metal concert at the Bataclan, Paris, on November 13 last year when Isis-affiliated gunmen stormed the hall and killed 89 people.
When they realised shots were being fired, the pair ran and hid in the cellar for three hours. They heard the sounds of shooting, screaming and the crash of dead bodies hitting the floor. At one point gunmen walked close by the room — the hideaways could hear them on walkie-talkies telling French police that they had hostages.
Ms Tudhope, a PR officer at Heriot-Watt University, made a claim for compensation with the Victims of Overseas Terrorism Compensation Scheme, which was set up by the Tory-led coalition in 2012.
But she received a letter last week stating: “The scheme only applies to an incident which the Foreign Secretary has determined a ‘designated act [of terrorism]’. The incident in which you sustained injury has not been designated.”
The government lists terrorist acts that can be claimed for on its website.
These include the hostage crisis in Algeria (2013), the kidnap of Setraco employees in Nigeria (2013), the attack at Westgate shopping centre in Kenya (2013), the attack at the Bardo National Museum in Tunisia (2015) and the attack at Port El Kantaoui in Tunisia (2015).
But more than two months after becoming the most infamous European attack for a decade, Paris is yet to make the list.
Labour MP Paul Flynn told the Star that he was “bowled over by the depths of government imbecility” in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office dragging its feet even though it only took hours last month for MPs to vote for Syria air strikes.
The motion was passed in the Commons with a huge majority of 174 six weeks ago.
Mr Flynn, a vocal opponent of war who represents Newport West, added: “This was an act of terrorism and there is no room for debate. What else could it be?
“This is typical of the moronic state of government. They declare war in a couple of hours and take a decade to deal with the implications after tying themselves up in gobbledegook regulations.
“This case sounds like another piece of bureaucratic unnecessary complication which is clogging up the system and the swift administration of compensation.”
A Foreign Office spokeswoman told the Star: “The Foreign Secretary’s approval of the designation process was a formality required under the legal process. The Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority will now take this forward.”
A Ministry of Justice spokesman said the letter sent to Ms Tudhope was “clumsily worded.”