Donald Trump grabs oil in Syria

This 23 October 2019 video from the USA says about itself:

Donald J Trump just said he’s keeping U.S. troops in Syria to keep guard on the oil and he’ll be deciding on what to do with it all.

From daily News Line in Britain:

Trump sends troops to steal Syrian oil

WHEN US President Donald Trump abruptly announced on October 9 that all US troops would be pulled out of northern Syria, his administration indicated that it was preparing for a full withdrawal from the country in the coming weeks.

Trump dumped his former Kurdish allies in the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) who had fought and defeated the Islamic State (ISIS) and were hailed as US ‘allies’, leaving them open to Turkish invasion.

In one of his tweets, Trump said at the time: ‘Very smart not to be involved in the intense fighting along the Turkish border, for a change … Others may want to come in and fight for one side or the other. Let them!’ Immediately, the Syrian army moved into the northern region of Syria to confront the Turkish invaders.

On Wednesday, the Syrian government issued a call on the Kurdish-led SDF to join the ranks of the national army to help defend the country from Turkish aggression. …

If Trump was prepared to betray the Kurdish people it is clear that US imperialism has not given up its military designs on Syria.

Having promised to pull all US troops out of the country, Trump has now ordered US troops into the southeast of the country to take over its oil fields.

Last Monday, Trump declared: ‘We’re keeping the oil. We want to keep the oil. Forty-five million dollars a month? Keep the oil. We’ve secured the oil.’

Trump was referring to the oil fields in Syria’s Deir Ezzor province that the SDF drove ISIS out of in 2017.

ISIS had used the oil from these fields, smuggled through Turkey, to fund its terrorist operations … Now US imperialism has taken on the role and is promising to go to war with anyone over their right to steal Syria’s oil.

Trump brazenly told reporters: ‘And what I intend to do, perhaps, is make a deal with ExxonMobil or one of our great companies to go in there and do it properly.’

Trump doesn’t care that this oil is the rightful property of the Syrian state and that seizing it constitutes a crime under international law. He didn’t even try to pretend that the US was ‘protecting’ the oil fields from terrorists.

In fact, Russia this week published satellite images taken last month that show trucks guarded by US troops and private military companies.

Commenting on the evidence, the Russian defence ministry spokesman said that these convoys ‘smuggle oil from fields in the eastern part of Syria to other countries’ …

Trump is prepared to go to war with the Syrian army, supported by Russia and Kurdish forces in order to keep hold of this stolen wealth.

The Pentagon has explicitly stated that US troops being redeployed to occupy Syria’s oil fields are prepared to unleash “overwhelming force,” including against troops loyal to Syria’s own government and the Russian and Iranian forces that support it: here.

10 thoughts on “Donald Trump grabs oil in Syria

  1. Internationalist Commune on the agreement with the Syrian regime

    “The agreement does not change anything for the global resistance. The Turkish war of aggression and the resistance against the occupation continues, with or without troops of the regime,” said the Internationalist Commune of Rojava.

    The Internationalist Commune of Rojava released a statement on the agreement between the democratic Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria and the Syrian regime.

    The statement reads as follows;

    “After the democratic Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria managed to conclude a military agreement with the forces of the Syrian regime on October 13, the military-political situation on the ground has gained some complexity. Countless speculations and deliberately dispersed misinformation circulate on social media and are also spread through the major news agencies. They cause uncertainty and confusion in the global resistance movement. It is therefore important to take a look at the facts on the ground.

    Already in the night of October 13 to 14, first reports spread quickly that units of the Syrian Arab Army (SAA) had entered the liberated areas of northeastern Syria. Images in the Syrian state media suggested that the troops had taken complete control of the cities of Tabqa, Raqqa, Hasakeh and Til Temir. However, the troops of the central Syrian state only took positions in Ayn Issa south of Kobane and in Til Temir south of Serekaniye. The agreement, reached after long negotiations, provides that the government forces, as the regular armed forces of the Syrian state, will take their positions on the northern border of the country and together with the democratic forces of Syria will defend Syria’s sovereignty and unity against Turkish aggression. This is a purely military agreement, and contrary to all speculation, the presence of Syrian government forces will not affect the self-government or internal security forces in the liberated areas. The mission of the Syrian troops remains limited to defending the country together against the Turkish occupation army.

    After the last American troops fled in a hurry with the onset of the first Turkish attacks on Manbij, on October 14th and 15th SAA troops took over several points and positioned themselves at the northern and western front of Manbij. However, with the exception of the arrival of the first Syrian soldiers in the city of Kobane, there has been no relocation of Syrian government troops to the border areas threatened by the invasion or even to the more active combat zones. Also, there is currently no presence of Russian military police or the SAA in Manbij. The SAA has positioned itself together with Manbij’s Military Council at the north and west fronts of the city and has assumed no function within the city.

    It is important to emphasize that the agreement now being discussed does not represent a swing in the tactical course of the Autonomous Administration, but rather that it is the direct continuation of the movement’s approach to a solution. The strategy of democratic autonomy was never a project of secession from the Syrian central state, but to strive for a solution to the crisis within the democratic unity of all parts of Syria. It has been always emphasized that a solution to Syria’s political crisis, and thus an end to the bloody war, can only be achieved through successful dialogue within Syria. The condition for the long-term return of the Syrian government troops to the territories of the Democratic Federation has always been the constitutional recognition of the Autonomous Administration, of all its local and trans-regional organs, its self-defense forces, as well as the rights of all ethnic and religious groups of Syria.

    The urgency of the situation, especially the imminent threat of genocide, made it necessary to take a step towards the regime and invite the government forces to defend Syria together. If the agreement were successfully implemented and the self-defense forces and the SAA succeeded jointly in driving the occupiers out of the country, this would lay the foundation for a further political solution process with Damascus. The agreement would also give the opportunity to expand the fight to the occupied territories west of the Euphrates, i.e. Jarablus, Bab, Azas, Mare and Afrin, which would allow hundreds of thousands of displaced people to return.

    It is important to emphasize once again that nothing changes in the political administration within northeastern Syria with this agreement. The revolution has its own principles, and these are not negotiable; not with the US, Russia or the Syrian regime. The project of a united, democratic-federal and independent Syria will continue to define the course of the dialogue with the central government. With the exception of the official statements of the self-government one should not believe wild speculations. And the agreement does not change anything for the global resistance. The Turkish war of aggression and the resistance against the occupation continues, with or without troops of the regime. Thus, the international solidarity movement should not be diverted from its path and further intensify the resistance.”

    Source: ANF NEWS DESK 17-10-2019


  2. Pingback: British corporate Iraqi oil corruption scandal | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: Trump attacks British Labour party | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: Donald Trump’s Syrian oil war | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: More Donald Trump oil war in Syria | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: Trump’s oil war in Syria, forever? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: Iraqis protest against Trump’s air raids | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: Trump’s war on United States disabled people | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: Fight coronavirus, not Erdogan’s war in Syria | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: Trump fights Iraq war, not coronavirus | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.