Trump fights Iraq war, not coronavirus


This 1 March 2020 video by the United States Democratic party congresswoman, presidential candidate, and Iraq war veteran in a military hospital Tulsi Gabbard says about itself:

Focus on war against Coronavirus—not protecting Al Qaeda-Turkish alliance!

President Trump, instead of going to war with Russia and Syria in order to protect the al-Qaeda-Turkish alliance, you should focus on the war against the Coronavirus.

Trump does not just fight a war for oil in Syria, but in Iraq as well; instead of fighting the coronavirus.

Trump’s presidency led straight to America’s epic coronavirus failure, by Alex Zeldin.

By Bill Van Auken in the USA:

13 March 2020

Pentagon officials announced late Thursday that US and British warplanes had launched airstrikes against multiple targets in Iraq in retaliation for a missile attack the day before on a military base north of Baghdad that killed two US troops and one British medic while wounding over a dozen other “coalition” troops. The number of Iraqi casualties from the attack was not initially reported.

According to a US official who spoke to the AP on condition of anonymity, the targets for the US bombing raids were sites associated with the Kataib Hezbollah militia, one of the largest components of the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), the coalition of largely Shia-based militia groups. Baghdad designated the PMF as part of Iraq’s armed forces after the militias played the predominant role in defeating the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), which had routed government troops and overrun a third of the country in 2014. …

The attack and the US-led retaliation could reignite military conflict with Iran, threatening to drag the Middle East and the world into war. …

There is widespread speculation in the media that the US will refrain from a direct attack on Iran under conditions of the mounting crisis over the coronavirus pandemic and the collapse of financial markets in the US and worldwide. Meanwhile, the Trump administration is attempting to salvage a crumbling agreement providing for a US troop withdrawal from Afghanistan.

The administration, however, may still seize on the missile attack in Iraq as a pretext for launching a major military action for the very purpose of shifting public attention from the increasingly catastrophic consequences of its criminal incompetence and indifference in the face of the pandemic.

There were no initial reports of Iraqi casualties resulting from Thursday night’s air raids. Previously, however, warplanes struck positions held by Iraqi Shia militia groups near the Syrian-Iraqi border town of Albu Kamal, reportedly killing at least 26 people. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reported the casualties and said that US warplanes had carried out the raid. …

This was followed by the January 3 US drone missile assassination of Gen. Qassem Suleimani, one of Iran’s most senior officials, after he arrived at Baghdad’s international airport aboard a commercial flight and passed through Iraqi customs with his diplomatic passport.

Killed in the same drone strike were Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, the chief of the Kataib Hezbollah militia and deputy leader of the Popular Mobilization Forces, along with several other Iraqis and Iranians.

Initially, Trump administration officials claimed that the strike was carried out to preempt imminent attacks being prepared by Suleimani against US forces in the Middle East. This phony pretext was later dropped, with Trump claiming that he needed no such justification and that the attack was justified as an act of vengeance for attacks on US troops by the Iraqi resistance to the American occupation. It has since become clear that Suleimani was targeted because he was carrying out a diplomatic mission to Iraq as part of an attempt to defuse tensions with Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates

Meanwhile, the Iraqi parliament is confronting Washington’s open defiance of its demand made last January, in the wake of the Suleimani assassination, that the 6,000 US troops remaining in Iraq be withdrawn.

Instead, the Pentagon has indicated that it intends to deploy US Patriot missile batteries in Iraq to counter any possible new threat from Iranian ballistic missiles. US Marine Gen. Kenneth McKenzie, the head of CENTCOM, told the House Armed Service Committee on Tuesday that the Pentagon was “in the process of bringing air defense systems, ballistic missile defense systems, into Iraq in particular, to protect ourselves against another potential Iranian attack.”

Last month, Iraq’s caretaker Prime Minister Adel Abdul-Mahdi addressed a letter to US Defense Secretary Esper warning that any deployment of Patriot missile batteries would be in defiance of the Iraqi government and would inflame popular opposition by signaling that the US has no intention of withdrawing its troops. …

There is little likelihood that Tehran ordered Wednesday’s rocket strike against the US-led occupation forces in Iraq. The country has been plunged into a deepening crisis by the coronavirus pandemic, which has hit it harder than any other country with the exceptions of China and Italy. The devastating “maximum pressure” campaign by Washington to drive the country’s oil exports down to zero and cut it off from the world market has denied it essential medical supplies. The Iranian government has issued an appeal to the International Monetary Fund for $5 billion in emergency funding to deal with the outbreak. It is hardly likely, under these conditions, to launch a military confrontation with the US.

Even as the world, and the United States itself, reels from the consequences of the pandemic and the failure of capitalist governments to either prepare for or adequately respond to its devastating effects, Washington continues to pursue its predatory interests in the Middle East and across the planet. The renewed violence in Iraq makes it clear that the threat of US imperialism dragging humanity into a catastrophic regional and even world war continues unabated.

US accused of shipping jihadists into Iraq: here.

To placate Trump, and on the advice of Pence, it looks as though Netanyahu picked the most extreme option on the table, by the Forward. Netanyahu quarantined all arrivals to placate Trump. US-Israel relations are diseased. By Abe Silberstein, March 10, 2020.

23 thoughts on “Trump fights Iraq war, not coronavirus

  1. President Trump’s speech on what he called a “foreign virus” left the overwhelming impression that foreigners are the virus. The President’s disturbing phrasing echoed centuries of dangerous anti-Semitic rhetoric blaming Jews for widespread disease. Take a close look at this sentence, which Chris Cillizza of CNN had to tweet out for those who couldn’t believe what they had just heard:

    “This is the most aggressive and comprehensive effort to confront a foreign virus in modern history,” Trump said.

    Let’s unpack that.

    Foreign. Virus.

    The idea that outsiders or foreigners are both dangerous — and dangerous to health — is straight out of the Nazi playbook.

    “A key part of Nazi ideology was to define the enemy and those who posed a threat to the so-called ‘Aryan race,’” the Holocaust Museum states on its website. “Nazi propaganda was essential in promoting the myth of the “national community” and identifying who should be excluded. Jews were considered the main enemy.”

    … The long intertwining of “outsiders” and “national health” is why the word “foreign” sent shivers down my spine. In his remarks, Trump blamed China, and then pivoted to criticizing the European Union. …

    Of course, the strategy of blaming someone else—namely, the “outsider” in a society—for a pandemic is at least as old as the Middle Ages, when Jews were blamed for the Black Death.

    After the Black Plague ended, the idea of tarring the “foreigner” for widespread death persisted. In his chilling article “Immigration, Ethnicity, and the Pandemic,” Dr. Alan Kraut traces how immigrants were historically blamed for pandemics.

    “In the 1830s, impoverished Irish immigrants were stigmatized as the bearers of cholera,” Kraut writes. “At the end of the 19th century, tuberculosis was dubbed the “Jewish disease” or the “tailor’s disease.”

    The “Jewish disease” doesn’t sound so different from the “foreign virus.” And just in case those of us who have read a history book didn’t get the point, Trump made sure to use the phrase “America First.”

    Public health has been used before as a justification to limit immigration, Kraut points out. “Medicalized prejudice became the foundation for the arguments of immigration restrictionists,” he writes.

    The virus may already be the new “wall.”

    At times, Trump’s speech sounded like a paean to the economy, peppered with comments on a virus. Despite Trump’s ample praise, stock futures dropped precipitously after he spoke about banning people and goods.

    That, too, is something Jewish history knows about — economic crisis is also often pinned on outsiders. When the economy shudders, there will again be a need to blame someone, preferably someone foreign, someone who is not part of the “family,” as Trump put it.

    Given these statements by world “leaders,” it’s no surprise that racism and xenophobia are on the rise, and that anti-Semitism related to the coronavirus is already spreading. Consider this tweet about an encounter on an airline:

    It may be hard to pay attention to language at a time like this, with infections and deaths increasing, and travel bans going up everywhere. But history suggests that the term “foreign virus” and its hateful implications may be as dangerous — and perhaps more dangerous — than the coronavirus itself.

    https://forward.com/culture/441459/why-trumps-foreign-virus-speech-is-as-dangerous-as-coronavirus-itself/

    Like

  2. Pingback: Pro-Big Oil Trump fights hungry people, not coronavirus | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Staff at Lebanese hospital strike over inadequate Covid-19 response

    Staff at the Rafik Hariri University Hospital (RHUH) in Greater Beirut declared an open-ended strike, which began Thursday. The RHUH has been at the forefront of the fight against the coronavirus epidemic in Lebanon.

    While they are battling to cope, they are accusing the government of neglect. The hospital has to cope with outdated equipment as well as leaving employees unpaid.

    As of this writing there has been 61 confirmed cases in the country with two deaths resulting from the Covid-19 outbreak.

    https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2020/03/13/work-m13.html

    Like

  4. Pingback: Bernie Sanders’ plan against coronavirus pandemic | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: Workers strike against being exposed to coronavirus | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: Iraq denounces Trump’s lethal hospital airstrikes | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: Trump tries to buy coronavirus vaccine monopoly | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: Coronavirus news of today | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: United States senators, coronavirus profiteers | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: ‘No workers’ coronavirus deaths for Wall Street’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: Coronavirus pandemic update, the Americas | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: Coronavirus, religious anti’Semitism and corporate greed | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: Coronavirus crisis, worldwide update | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  14. Pingback: Trump supports Brazilan Bolsonaro’s coronavirus denialism | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  15. Pingback: Coronavirus news update | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  16. Pingback: Chomsky on Trump’s United States coronavirus disaster | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  17. Pingback: How Trump’s USA became world coronavirus epicenter | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  18. Pingback: Vietnamese medical supplies to the USA | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  19. Pingback: Coronavirus update, Donald Trump´s USA | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  20. Pingback: Coronavirus disaster in the USA, update | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  21. Pingback: COVID-19 disaster news from Britain | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  22. Pingback: German government spends billions on militarism | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  23. Pingback: Cut war, not healthcare, John Pilger says | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.