NSA spying on political views of millions of cellphone users


This video from Germany is called Edward Snowden Interview ARD/NDR January 2014.

By Eric London:

New report reveals

NSA, GCHQ mapping “political alignment” of cellphone users

28 January 2014

New information made public by Edward Snowden reveals that the governments of the United States and United Kingdom are trawling data from cellphone “apps” to accumulate dossiers on the “political alignments” of millions of smartphone users worldwide.

According to a 2012 internal UK Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) document, the National Security Agency (NSA) and GCHQ have been accumulating and storing hundreds of millions of user “cookies” —the digital footprints left on a cellphone or computer each time a user visits a web site—in order to accumulate detailed personal information about users’ private lives.

This confirms that the main purpose of the programs is not to protect the population from “terrorism,” but to facilitate the state repression of working class opposition to widening social inequality and social counterrevolution. The programs do not primarily target “terrorists,” but workers, intellectuals, and students.

The collection of data regarding the “political alignment” of cellphone users also suggests that the governments of the US and UK are keeping lists of those whose “political alignments” are of concern to the government. Previous revelations have shown how the NSA and GCHQ “flag” certain “suspects” for additional surveillance: the most recent revelation indicates that suspects are “flagged” at least in part based on their “political alignment.”

The legal rationale behind this process points to a growing movement to criminalize political thought in the US and UK.

If, as the revelations indicate, determining a user’s “political alignment” is a primary goal of this program, then it is also likely a factor in determining whether the government has a “reasonable, articulable suspicion” that the user is a “terrorist suspect.” If this is the case, the web sites a user visits may raise the government’s level of suspicion that the user is engaged in criminal activity, and may thereby provide the government with the pseudo-legal pretext required to unlock the content of all his or her phone calls, emails, text messages, etc.

Such a rationale would amount to a flagrant violation of both the First and Fourth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Not only does the Fourth Amendment protect against “unreasonable searches and seizures,” but the First Amendment also proscribes the government from monitoring individuals based on their political beliefs. The elimination of such a fundamental democratic right would be a dangerous step towards the imposition of a police state dictatorship.

The new report also details the depth of the mobile-app spying operation.

A 2009 “brute-force” analysis test performed by the NSA and GCHQ of what the New York Times describes as a “tiny sliver of their cellphone databases” revealed that in one month, the NSA collected cellphone data of 8,615,650 cellphone users. Data from the GCHQ test revealed that in three months, the British had spied on 24,760,289 users. Expanded to a full year, this data shows that in 2009, the NSA collected data from over 103,000,000 users, while GCHQ collected data from over 99,000,000 users: and this coming from only a “tiny sliver” of a month’s data!

“They are gathered in bulk, and are currently our single largest type of events,” one leaked document reads.

The program—referred to in one NSA document as “Golden Nugget!”—also allows the governments to receive a log of users’ Google Maps application use. Such information allows the intelligence apparatus to track the exact whereabouts of surveillance victims worldwide. One chart from an internal NSA slideshow asks: “Where was my target when they did this?” and “Where is my target going?”

An NSA report from 2007 bragged that so much geo-data could be gathered that the intelligence agencies would “be able to clone Google’s database” of all searches for directions made via Google Maps.

“It effectively means that anyone using Google Maps on a smartphone is working in support of a GCHQ system,” a 2008 GCHQ report noted.

Additional presentation material leaked by Snowden shows that in 2010 the NSA explained that its “perfect scenario” was to “target uploading photo to a social media site taken with a mobile device.” The same slide asks, “What can we get?” The answer, according to the same presentation, includes the photographs of the user, buddy lists, emails, phone contacts, and “a host of other social networking data as well as location.”

The agencies also use information provided by mobile apps to paint a clear picture of the victim’s current location, sexual orientation, marital status, income, ethnicity, education level, and number of children.

GCHQ has an internal code-name system for grading their ability to snoop on a particular cellphone user. The codes are based on the television show “The Smurfs.” If the agencies can tap the phone’s microphone to listen to conversations, the codename “Nosey Smurf” is employed. If the agencies can track the precise location of the user as he or she moves, the codename “Tracker Smurf” is used. The ability to track a phone that is powered off is named “Dreamy Smurf,” and the ability to hide the spy software is coded “Paranoid Smurf.”

That the intelligence agencies have cheekily nicknamed codes in an Orwellian surveillance program after animated characters from a children’s show is a telling indication of the contempt with which the ruling class views the democratic rights of the population of the world.

Additionally, the agencies have been tracking and storing data from a series of cellphone game applications, including the popular “Angry Birds” game, which has been downloaded over 1.7 billion times.

The tracking of data from online games like “Angry Birds” further reveals that these programs are not intended to protect the population from “terrorism.” It would be indefensible for the NSA and GCHQ to explain that they suspected to glean information about looming Al Qaeda plots from a mindless cellphone game.

Yet this is precisely how the NSA has attempted to justify these programs.

“The communications of people who are not valid foreign intelligence targets are not of interest to the National Security Agency,” an agency spokeswoman said. “Any implication that NSA’s foreign intelligence collection is focused on the smartphone or social media communications of everyday Americans is not true. Moreover, NSA does not profile everyday Americans as it carries out its foreign intelligence mission.”

In an added indication of its anti-democratic character, the US government is therefore employing the technique of the “Big Lie” by denying what has just been proven true.

In reality, the revelations have further exposed President Barack Obama’s January 17 speech as a celebration of lies.

The president told the nation that the spying programs do “not involve the NSA examining the phone records of ordinary Americans.” He also said that the US “is not abusing authorities to listen to your private phone calls or read your emails,” and that “the United States is not spying on ordinary people who don’t threaten our national security.”

He added in reference to the “folks” at the NSA that “nothing I have learned [about the programs] indicated that our intelligence community has sought to violate the law or is cavalier about the civil liberties of their fellow citizens.”

But the evidence is mounting that the governments of the US and UK are compiling information regarding the “political alignments” of hundreds of millions across the globe. All those responsible for carrying out such a facially anti-democratic campaign—including President Obama, David Cameron, their aides, and the leaders of the security apparatus—must face criminal charges and immediate removal from office.

By Bill Van Auken in the USA:

US media blacks out Snowden interview exposing death threats

28 January 2014

The former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden appeared Sunday night in his first extended television interview. Citing published statements by unnamed US intelligence and military operatives calling for his assassination, he warned that he faces “significant threats” to his life and that US “government officials want to kill me.”

The interview, broadcast by the German television network ARD, was largely blacked out by the US media. The New York Times carried not a word of what Snowden said, while the cable and broadcast news programs treated the interview with near total silence.

The American media’s reaction stood in stark contrast to that of both broadcast and print media in Germany, where the interview conducted with Snowden in Russia was treated as a major political event.

From Twitter:

How many #NSA spies does it take to screw in a light bulb? That information is classified. Also, the light bulb program doesn’t exist.

In a decision involving two cases of police searches of cellular phone contents, the US Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that, as a general rule, individual privacy rights require law enforcement officers to obtain a search warrant before searching through a phone’s “contacts” list or other data, such as photographs or videos: here.

Huge swath of GCHQ mass surveillance is illegal, says top lawyer. Legal advice given to MPs warns that British spy agency is ‘using gaps in regulation to commit serious crime with impunity’: here.

Enhanced by Zemanta

29 thoughts on “NSA spying on political views of millions of cellphone users

  1. Pingback: Edward Snowden deserves Nobel Peace Prize, Norwegian MP’s say | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  2. Pingback: NSA scandal continues with attacks on Snowden | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: NSA spying scandals continue | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: Edward Snowden and journalists threatened | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: US Assistant Secretary of State says F-ck the European Union | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: Australian government censorship about torture | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: NSA spying, Edward Snowden and the European Parliament | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: NSA spying threatens journalism | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: NSA, Australian economic spying on Indonesia and United States lawyers | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: Over one million petition for Brazilian asylum for Snowden | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: NSA spying on WikiLeaks | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: Edward Snowden voted Rector of Glasgow University in Scotland | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: Greek governmental political spying on children | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  14. Pingback: NSA, GCHQ spy on millions of Yahoo users | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  15. Pingback: Ant or grasshopper? | valeriedavies

  16. Pingback: NSA spies on billions of people, Snowden says | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  17. Pingback: Edward Snowden denounces global spying | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  18. Pingback: CIA violates United States constitution, Senator Feinstein says | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  19. Pingback: Graffiti artist Banksy against spying on citizens | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  20. Pingback: New Zealand government glorifies World War I | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  21. Pingback: United States NSA spies scared of Bahamas hummingbirds invasion | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  22. Pingback: NSA spies on all mobile phone calls in Afghanistan | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  23. Pingback: Edward Snowden about revealing NSA spying | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  24. Pingback: British protest against Microsoft’s role in NSA Internet spying | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  25. Pingback: NSA spying on Merkel investigation | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  26. Pingback: Governments spying on Vodafone conversations | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  27. Pingback: British government spies on anti-Iraq war Green party | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  28. Pingback: Germany summons United States ambassador about NSA spying | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  29. Pingback: British, United States spying violating international law | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s