This video from Germany is called Edward Snowden Interview ARD/NDR January 2014.
By Eric London:
New report reveals
NSA, GCHQ mapping “political alignment” of cellphone users
28 January 2014
New information made public by Edward Snowden reveals that the governments of the United States and United Kingdom are trawling data from cellphone “apps” to accumulate dossiers on the “political alignments” of millions of smartphone users worldwide.
According to a 2012 internal UK Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) document, the National Security Agency (NSA) and GCHQ have been accumulating and storing hundreds of millions of user “cookies” —the digital footprints left on a cellphone or computer each time a user visits a web site—in order to accumulate detailed personal information about users’ private lives.
This confirms that the main purpose of the programs is not to protect the population from “terrorism,” but to facilitate the state repression of working class opposition to widening social inequality and social counterrevolution. The programs do not primarily target “terrorists,” but workers, intellectuals, and students.
The collection of data regarding the “political alignment” of cellphone users also suggests that the governments of the US and UK are keeping lists of those whose “political alignments” are of concern to the government. Previous revelations have shown how the NSA and GCHQ “flag” certain “suspects” for additional surveillance: the most recent revelation indicates that suspects are “flagged” at least in part based on their “political alignment.”
The legal rationale behind this process points to a growing movement to criminalize political thought in the US and UK.
If, as the revelations indicate, determining a user’s “political alignment” is a primary goal of this program, then it is also likely a factor in determining whether the government has a “reasonable, articulable suspicion” that the user is a “terrorist suspect.” If this is the case, the web sites a user visits may raise the government’s level of suspicion that the user is engaged in criminal activity, and may thereby provide the government with the pseudo-legal pretext required to unlock the content of all his or her phone calls, emails, text messages, etc.
Such a rationale would amount to a flagrant violation of both the First and Fourth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Not only does the Fourth Amendment protect against “unreasonable searches and seizures,” but the First Amendment also proscribes the government from monitoring individuals based on their political beliefs. The elimination of such a fundamental democratic right would be a dangerous step towards the imposition of a police state dictatorship.
The new report also details the depth of the mobile-app spying operation.
A 2009 “brute-force” analysis test performed by the NSA and GCHQ of what the New York Times describes as a “tiny sliver of their cellphone databases” revealed that in one month, the NSA collected cellphone data of 8,615,650 cellphone users. Data from the GCHQ test revealed that in three months, the British had spied on 24,760,289 users. Expanded to a full year, this data shows that in 2009, the NSA collected data from over 103,000,000 users, while GCHQ collected data from over 99,000,000 users: and this coming from only a “tiny sliver” of a month’s data!
“They are gathered in bulk, and are currently our single largest type of events,” one leaked document reads.
The program—referred to in one NSA document as “Golden Nugget!”—also allows the governments to receive a log of users’ Google Maps application use. Such information allows the intelligence apparatus to track the exact whereabouts of surveillance victims worldwide. One chart from an internal NSA slideshow asks: “Where was my target when they did this?” and “Where is my target going?”
An NSA report from 2007 bragged that so much geo-data could be gathered that the intelligence agencies would “be able to clone Google’s database” of all searches for directions made via Google Maps.
“It effectively means that anyone using Google Maps on a smartphone is working in support of a GCHQ system,” a 2008 GCHQ report noted.
Additional presentation material leaked by Snowden shows that in 2010 the NSA explained that its “perfect scenario” was to “target uploading photo to a social media site taken with a mobile device.” The same slide asks, “What can we get?” The answer, according to the same presentation, includes the photographs of the user, buddy lists, emails, phone contacts, and “a host of other social networking data as well as location.”
The agencies also use information provided by mobile apps to paint a clear picture of the victim’s current location, sexual orientation, marital status, income, ethnicity, education level, and number of children.
GCHQ has an internal code-name system for grading their ability to snoop on a particular cellphone user. The codes are based on the television show “The Smurfs.” If the agencies can tap the phone’s microphone to listen to conversations, the codename “Nosey Smurf” is employed. If the agencies can track the precise location of the user as he or she moves, the codename “Tracker Smurf” is used. The ability to track a phone that is powered off is named “Dreamy Smurf,” and the ability to hide the spy software is coded “Paranoid Smurf.”
That the intelligence agencies have cheekily nicknamed codes in an Orwellian surveillance program after animated characters from a children’s show is a telling indication of the contempt with which the ruling class views the democratic rights of the population of the world.
Additionally, the agencies have been tracking and storing data from a series of cellphone game applications, including the popular “Angry Birds” game, which has been downloaded over 1.7 billion times.
The tracking of data from online games like “Angry Birds” further reveals that these programs are not intended to protect the population from “terrorism.” It would be indefensible for the NSA and GCHQ to explain that they suspected to glean information about looming Al Qaeda plots from a mindless cellphone game.
Yet this is precisely how the NSA has attempted to justify these programs.
“The communications of people who are not valid foreign intelligence targets are not of interest to the National Security Agency,” an agency spokeswoman said. “Any implication that NSA’s foreign intelligence collection is focused on the smartphone or social media communications of everyday Americans is not true. Moreover, NSA does not profile everyday Americans as it carries out its foreign intelligence mission.”
In an added indication of its anti-democratic character, the US government is therefore employing the technique of the “Big Lie” by denying what has just been proven true.
In reality, the revelations have further exposed President Barack Obama’s January 17 speech as a celebration of lies.
The president told the nation that the spying programs do “not involve the NSA examining the phone records of ordinary Americans.” He also said that the US “is not abusing authorities to listen to your private phone calls or read your emails,” and that “the United States is not spying on ordinary people who don’t threaten our national security.”
He added in reference to the “folks” at the NSA that “nothing I have learned [about the programs] indicated that our intelligence community has sought to violate the law or is cavalier about the civil liberties of their fellow citizens.”
But the evidence is mounting that the governments of the US and UK are compiling information regarding the “political alignments” of hundreds of millions across the globe. All those responsible for carrying out such a facially anti-democratic campaign—including President Obama, David Cameron, their aides, and the leaders of the security apparatus—must face criminal charges and immediate removal from office.
By Bill Van Auken in the USA:
US media blacks out Snowden interview exposing death threats
28 January 2014
The former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden appeared Sunday night in his first extended television interview. Citing published statements by unnamed US intelligence and military operatives calling for his assassination, he warned that he faces “significant threats” to his life and that US “government officials want to kill me.”
The interview, broadcast by the German television network ARD, was largely blacked out by the US media. The New York Times carried not a word of what Snowden said, while the cable and broadcast news programs treated the interview with near total silence.
The American media’s reaction stood in stark contrast to that of both broadcast and print media in Germany, where the interview conducted with Snowden in Russia was treated as a major political event.
How many #NSA spies does it take to screw in a light bulb? That information is classified. Also, the light bulb program doesn’t exist.
In a decision involving two cases of police searches of cellular phone contents, the US Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that, as a general rule, individual privacy rights require law enforcement officers to obtain a search warrant before searching through a phone’s “contacts” list or other data, such as photographs or videos: here.
YOUR CELLPHONE IS TRACKING YOU “Makers of surveillance systems are offering governments across the world the ability to track the movements of almost anybody who carries a cellphone, whether they are blocks away or on another continent. The technology works by exploiting an essential fact of all cellular networks: They must keep detailed, up-to-the-minute records on the locations of their customers to deliver calls and other services to them. Surveillance systems are secretly collecting these records to map people’s travels over days, weeks or longer, according to company marketing documents and experts in surveillance technology.” This graphic explains how your device can be used against you. [WaPo]
Huge swath of GCHQ mass surveillance is illegal, says top lawyer. Legal advice given to MPs warns that British spy agency is ‘using gaps in regulation to commit serious crime with impunity’: here.
Pingback: Free Julian Assange demonstrations | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: French bank threatens tax dodging whistleblower’s life | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: United States Democratic candidate Biden’s ‘Trump-lite’ campaign | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Artificial intelligence, racism and sexism | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: United States-German governments collision course | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Australian journalism on war crimes, spying: criminal? | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Facebook censors advertisement on war crimes whistleblowers | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Facebook crypto-currency threatens privacy | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Donald Trump’s racist anti-socialist witch-hunt | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Amazon boss Jeff Bezos promotes militarism | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: No free speech on Australian anti-refugee persecution | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Neo-nazi networks in United States armed forces | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: United States police, Amazon violating privacy | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Dutch ‘intelligence’ illegally spying on citizens | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Corporate media silence on Roger Waters, Assange | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: ‘Russiagate conspiracy’ campaign based on double agent | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Edward Snowden on governmental spying | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Edward Snowden, MSNBC TV interview | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Trump’s violence threats, Biden and Ukrainian gas | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Trump impeachment, not about war on immigrants | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Edward Snowden on his new book | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: US spy kills English teenager, flees from justice | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: CIA, FBI not good alternatives to Trump | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: New York Times ‘Yellow Peril’ anti-Asian xenophobia | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Justice for the Chagos islanders | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Free war crimes whistleblower Assange, London meeting | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: US government would kill Snowden for truth-telling | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Presidential candidate Buttigieg and the Iraq war | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: CIA torture scandal, new information | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: CIA torturers and their accomplices in other countries | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: London police dodgy facial recognition technology | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: CIA smears Sanders as ‘tool of Russia’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: US establishment smears Sanders as ‘Russian stooge’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: US Trump administration negligence on coronavirus epidemic | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: United States Super Tuesday election update | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: United States Republican Senator Burr, coronavirus profiteer | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: United States senators, coronavirus profiteers | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Curveball, new film on Iraq war lies | Dear Kitty. Some blog