British bombs kill Afghan civilians


This video is called Afghanistan Civilian Casualties in Helmand (August 2007). It says about itself:

During bombings over Helmand, Afghanistan 18 civilians were killed, while the international forces claim there were no civilian deaths.

From the BBC today:

Airstrike kills Afghan civilians

Four Afghan civilians have been killed in an airstrike by British forces, the Ministry of Defence said. …

The four bodies – two women and two children – and one injured person were found when troops inspected the area. …

Prince Harry worked with the air support, the British Forward Air Controllers, until he returned from Afghanistan less than two weeks ago.

Afghan medical workers’ strike called off: here.

38 thoughts on “British bombs kill Afghan civilians

  1. Tories don’t deny report of $1-billion Afghan budget blowout

    Alexander Panetta, THE CANADIAN PRESS

    The Canadian Press

    March 11, 2008

    – The Conservative government scrambled Tuesday to explain a report that the Afghanistan mission will run $1 billion over budget this fiscal year.

    The government did not deny the budget blowout for 2007-08 reported in Montreal’s La Presse newspaper. It simply warned that the $1 billion was based on preliminary estimates that cannot be confirmed until after the end of the fiscal year later this month.

    The report came two days before a scheduled confidence vote in the House of Commons on extending Canada’s military mission in Afghanistan.

    It also came as John Manley, who headed a panel on the future of the mission, said violence will drag on in the wartorn country unless there’s a political agreement with the Taliban.

    Documents obtained under the Access to Information Act indicate the mission has cost Canadian taxpayers at least $7.5 billion since 2001 – double what was budgeted.

    The documents say the mission cost $538 million more than expected over the first six months of the current fiscal year, and is projected to overshoot its budget by another $539 million by March 31.

    “I wouldn’t say that that’s necessarily accurate,” Defence Minister Peter MacKay said of the 2007-08 projection.

    “That’s based on a number of assessments that really are speculating right now on what the final costs are going to be over a full year.”

    The Defence Department says the projected budget for the Afghanistan mission through 2009 was $4.5 billion, but was adjusted to $5 billion because of the additional equipment purchased to protect soldiers. It says the increase does not count as a cost overrun.

    The $5 billion figure, however, is at adds with the $6.3 billion cited by former defence minister Gordon O’Connor in a post-budget hearing last spring before the House of Commons.

    Government sources say cost overruns have been an issue. Senior government officials say the military was warned last fall to keep its spending under-budget for 2008-09 after exceeding projections in previous years.

    The NDP raised the latest projected cost over-runs in its latest attack on the efficiency of the mission.

    New Democrats and the Bloc Quebecois are dead-set against a mission extension and are poised to vote against it Thursday.

    The Conservatives are staunchly in favour and have managed to reach a deal with the Liberals, who have lately been backing down in any confidence vote that could trigger an election.

    Thursday’s vote would extend the military mission in Kandahar province until 2011.

    The Tory-Liberal co-operation has given the NDP a hot-button issue with which to attack both of its rivals – and the cost overruns conveniently provided them with political ammunition just before the vote.

    “These are numbers that of course the government wasn’t telling us about, wasn’t telling Canadians about,” NDP Leader Jack Layton said.

    “It’s the mismanagement of the war. The costs are spiralling out of control just as we’ve seen by the Americans in Iraq and the government didn’t deny this.”

    Members of the blue-ribbon Manley panel on Afghanistan appeared at a parliamentary committee Tuesday to discuss their findings. They stressed the non-military aspects of the mission.

    Pamela Wallin spoke of her conversations with soldiers who described how moved they were to see classrooms full of Afghan girls.

    Manley said that while some members of the hardline former Taliban regime deserve to be hauled before the International Criminal Court for human-rights atrocities, peace can only be achieved with some Taliban co-operation.

    “This insurgency – unless it’s the first one ever – will not end via military success,” Manley said.

    “It will end because of a political agreement that will resolve some of the issues that are there. . .

    “We mustn’t get ourselves into the position . . . where we’re prepared to fight to the last Taliban, because quite frankly, we will never reach that point.”

    Like

  2. Pingback: British anti-Afghan war movement, 20 November | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: New Zealanders say stop Afghan war | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: US marine against Afghan war | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: US private death squads in Afghanistan, Pakistan | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: U.S. death toll in Afghanistan 1,000 | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: United States ‘liberal’ media pro Afghan war | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: Afghan war costs a state secret, Canadian Conservatives say | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: NATO mortars kill Afghan civilians | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: US bombs kill Afghan civilians again | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: Afghan Malalai Joya on US bombs | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: “Kill an Afghan Muslim for Christ” | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: Again Afghan civilians killed by US air strike | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  14. Pingback: Anti Afghan war die-in in London | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  15. Pingback: Afghan women “worse” off than under Taliban | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  16. Pingback: No democracy at The Hague Afghanistan conference | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  17. Pingback: Afghan civilians killed again | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  18. Pingback: US bombs kill Afghan children, women | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  19. Pingback: Homeless Afghan footballers seek asylum in Australia | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  20. Pingback: Get out of Afghanistan, Afghan feminist says | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  21. Pingback: Rupert Murdoch’s scandals get bigger and bigger | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  22. Pingback: 007 wins Afghan war | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  23. Pingback: British ex Labour MP quits ‘new’ Labour | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  24. Pingback: BAE mercenary charged with murdering Afghan civilian | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  25. Pingback: Afghan wedding bombed by US airplanes | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  26. Pingback: Occupiers killing civilians anger Afghans | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  27. Pingback: Afghan civilian deaths rising | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  28. Pingback: German spying on aid organization in Afghanistan | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  29. Pingback: British government spies on injured soldiers | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  30. Pingback: Anti Afghanistan war song | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  31. Pingback: British invasion of Pakistan? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  32. Pingback: Pakistani Imran Khan against Bush’s war | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  33. Pingback: Palin and the Afghan war, animation | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  34. Pingback: British bailouts for bankers, cuts for battered women | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  35. Pingback: British government for nuclear weapons, against marine science | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  36. Pingback: NATO kills six Afghani civilians | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  37. Pingback: ‘Stop deporting Afghan refugees to death’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  38. Pingback: NATO kills Afghan police | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.