Grenfell Tower solidarity in London

This video from London, England says about itself:

We Need Justice For Grenfell

2 July 2017

We won’t stop demanding answers. We won’t stop demanding justice.

By Felicity Collier in London, England:

Labour lays into Kensington council over fire rents mess

Monday 3rd July 2017

LABOUR slammed Kensington and Chelsea council yesterday for dragging its heels over suspending rent for people affected by the Grenfell Tower fire.

The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea has finally declared that those living in three blocks surrounding Grenfell would not pay rent until at least January 2018.

The three buildings, in Barandon Walk, Testerton Walk and Hurstway have been without hot water since the neighbourhood’s boiler, located beneath Grenfell Tower, was destroyed in the fire.

Shadow communities secretary Andrew Gwynne branded the delay “unacceptable.”

He said: “People have been made homeless in this tragedy, lost family, friends and everything they own — [Communities Secretary] Sajid Javid needs to finally show some leadership and send in commissioners to take control of this council.”

The news came after one survivor of the blaze said she was still having rent deducted by the council for her destroyed flat and housing campaigner Pilgrim Tucker reported that many more had had deductions made.

Justice for Grenfell co-ordinator Yvette Williams said: “It is quite clear that whatever is supposed to be happening down there isn’t happening.”

She told ITV News: “A major, morbid concern is that money is being taken out of dead people’s accounts. These kinds of things happening — it’s bordering on abuse now.”

The Radical Housing Network, of which the Grenfell Action Group is a part, had earlier called for rent to be halted and refunded, saying: “None of the residents should pay rent when questions over the safety of their homes remain.”

The council promised a refund to those who had money “inadvertently taken.”

Andrew, London 1 July anti-Theresa May demonstrator

From the World Socialist Web Site, reporting from London, England:

“People died because they used cheap cladding. It’s like war between rich and poor”

Anti-austerity protestors speak on the Grenfell Tower fire

By our reporters

3 July 2017

The World Socialist Web Site interviewed some of those participating in Saturday’s anti-austerity demonstration. The issue that dominated people’s thoughts was the Grenfell Tower inferno and its implications.

Andrew: “I live in a similar tower [to Grenfell] in Newham. We have not been told anything. They will not do what they have done at Camden and conduct a mass evacuation.

“You cannot prevent a fire but you can always reduce its impact. I work in information security, which operates on the same logic of reducing risk.

“I visit Silicon Valley regularly as part of my job. It does not matter if you have brains. It is only the few who become wealthy. The rich are hoarding the wealth. They try to make money out of everything. It is simply crooked.

“If we keep on following the same road then Grenfell will be the tip of the iceberg. Since 1991 and with Reagan, Thatcher and Gorbachev, we have had the oligarchs. Warren Buffett said, ‘Of course there is a class struggle and we are winning.’”

Tariq, 1 July London anti-Theresa May demonstrator

Tariq: “Grenfell is really the end result of more than just seven years of austerity. It really started in the 1980s with Thatcher and Reagan. They call it ‘neo-liberalism.’ There’s nothing liberal about it as far as I’m concerned; its ‘neo-corporatism.’

“Finally, I think that people are starting to wake up to ways of changing this. I think, what happened at Grenfell Tower broke people’s hearts in this country. People don’t just want answers, they want people to be held responsible.

“For people who’ve been aware of this for some time, I think it’s sort of like the full stop on the capitalist system of governance and control. They don’t just govern over us, they control us. Poorer people can spend up to 80, 90 or even 100 percent of their income just to get by. That’s not a type of society we really want to live in.

“It looks like the banks might crash again. There’s been no stringent reforms after 2008. Is it going to take another financial crash to wake more people up? I hope not. I hope people wake up before that.”

Laura, 1 July London anti-Theresa May demonstrator

Laura: “I’m shocked about the Grenfell Tower fire. I’m on this demonstration today to oppose the cuts to public services, such as the lack of inspections at the tower, the cutting of corners in terms of the cladding used and the difficulties of the council staff to deal with the aftermath of the tragedy.

“As in the Hurricane Katrina tragedy in the US, ordinary people are moved but I feel that those in the council and the government are less concerned. I guess because it’s to do with social housing and largely concerns people who are less well off.”

Ayisha: “Everybody knows the Grenfell Tower disaster happened in Notting Hill. Everyone knows rich people live there, poor people live there in council houses in huge estates. This wouldn’t happen to rich people. It’s the poor people that get affected, like many times before in the past.

Fire-fighters said that the cladding wasn’t good enough. People in the tower had said that if a fire did happen these would be the implications. And now it’s happened. It was preventable.

“These conditions affect poor people all around the world who live in council housing, high-rise tower blocks, etc. They’re thinking: ‘This could happen to us.’

“In the last few weeks, we’ve seen that towers in Camden, all over London, have got the same cladding. People have been evacuated. They don’t want to live there. It’s awful. The government needs to do something about it. People are angry. People know this shouldn’t have happened. That’s why people are rallying here today. It’s austerity measures.

“Privatization started from Thatcher and continued. It’s the result of Thatcher, of Blair, of Brown. Blair might as well have been a Tory himself. It’s all culminated into this. All parties are to blame. For a lot of companies it’s all about money, competition for contracts, where will the profits go? It would have been more expensive to get the right cladding. A few pounds cheaper for every square metre. It’s all about profit. ‘Where can we save money? Where can we cut costs?’”

Noura: “Grenfell is a symbol of the austerity in Britain that’s been happening for so many years. The inner city areas have always been neglected.

“People from all across the UK, and especially in London, who might not have thought about these issues are coming together. Many ask, ‘What is the point in marching when we’ve been ignored for so long?’ But I think we’ve reached a point where young and old are tired of it and want to make a stand.

“I come from north London and a similar event happened there and we’re worried that our tower block has cladding on it. We’re sick of it. Many in the UK have had their moral compass stirred and are thinking, instead of taking a back seat, they’re going to do something about it. That’s what we desperately need.

“The government don’t care about young people coming up. They don’t care about how much they’re impacting people.

“Take one look at Grenfell Tower. If you go up in person you can see how horrific it is. Concrete doesn’t burn. They had the option to use less flammable material—but they decided to save a few pence and risk the lives of hundreds of people. We don’t even know how many survived—79—are you kidding me?

“I guarantee you that if this happened in Surrey or Kent, or anywhere with a less multicultural population, a lot more would be done. They don’t care about the minorities. They don’t care about the working class. They don’t care about the people who actually build this country, who are mending the community through their own actions.

“The government and local authority are absent. Theresa May is saying the communities are doing a great job—yeah we are, but what are you doing? You’ve just given a billion pounds to the Democratic Unionist Party but you don’t want to fund the emergency services.”

Syed, London 1 July anti-Theresa May demonstrator

Syed: “The Grenfell fire was terrible and made me very sad. Those people and the fire-fighters were helpless. The fire authorities were partly responsible. They could have done much more. The authorities told residents to stay inside the building while the fire spread.

“I’m from Bangladesh and I’ve seen similar tragedies there. I didn’t expect this to happen in the UK, in one of the richest areas in the world. They spent millions on the building to make it look nice for the rich. If they spent five thousand extra on cladding they could have saved many lives. It shows the value they put on the lives of ordinary people.”

Ben, 1 July London anti-Theresa May demonstrator

Ben, a university student from Salford in Manchester: “I am tired of the social injustice. I feel like if we don’t get together, unite and revolt nothing will change. It takes the working class to create the positive change for the whole of society. We should go against what we are told to do and should get together to go and get the elite who rule us.

“Grenfell Tower was absolutely horrific and avoidable. People need to be held accountable for it. The elite have an ulterior motive and an agenda and we need to make sure justice is served. Cuts and the way they see us as the working classes and the poor are the reasons which led to the fire.”

Chris: “I’ve come from Derby today. I lived and studied in London. I have come down today because the Grenfell Tower disaster really struck a heartstring with me. Before my current employment, I was an architecture student. I think we need to look at how to improve things for the people of the city, rather than the wealthy few.

Chris, 1 July London anti-Theresa May demonstrator

“The fact that costs were cut in order to create a false façade to prettify the image of the building, and which cost so many lives, is an absolute tragedy. We need to make sure that the media does not forget about it over the next weeks. We need to be talking about it week after week after week. It has such serious implications.

“We are a fractured society, and what is left of Grenfell Tower should stay and serve as a monument to all the people who died, and that you can’t just move people out [of the area] through the negligence of the Tory government. Austerity cannot continue as it has been doing. Everybody matters in this world. People come to this country and contribute to the economy, and the government treats them like the people in Grenfell Tower.

“We need to make sure our voices are heard, and that we will not put up with austerity. Everybody deserves to be treated equally, and not be put at risk because of austerity.”

Eva: “I came down from West London today wearing a tee-shirt with the I-heart-Grenfell logo to show my support for the people of Grenfell and for what it means on a wider scale, for what is happening with the political uprising that is going on in the country at the moment.

“The root cause of the fire was the utter neglect of the working class. It was the result of a ‘trickle up’ effect. They only concentrated on the people who were giving them the money.

“The disaster has touched many people, and not just in this country. We have been watching news on CNN on the day the Senator got shot, but they led with the Grenfell disaster. It shows what it means on a wider scale. It’s neglect and negligence.

“In terms of the numbers in Grenfell Tower, the authorities know these are lower class families, and also big families. A lot of them are refugees—I came to this country myself as a refugee. It’s not simply saying, there is a one-bedroom flat, we know more people lived there. I shared a room with my siblings. There would have been large families in that building. They are not giving us the information we need. They are trying to control the population and control our reaction to this absolute tragedy. It is a crime. People should be put on trial with a judge. Someone needs to pay for it.”

Jacqueline, 1 July London anti-Theresa May demonstrator

Jacqueline: “I made this poster because I feel quite strongly about what has happened to the Grenfell residents. I think it is a grave injustice and I want something to be done about it.

“I went to school in that area. There is a community of people there from lots of different cultures, religions and backgrounds.

“I’ve heard about the poisoned water in Flint, Michigan. It just shows that the lives of working people are just seen as worthless. Something has to be done about this whole situation.

“I read that the Grenfell Tower was put up in the 1970s and there have been some fires there in the past. However, it was only when the major refurbishment was done—with the metal windows taken out and replaced by plastic ones and the new cladding installed, and the gas pipes—that it was these things that caused the fire to spread.

“I don’t like the fact the Grenfell residents were not listened to, and that some of them were even served with cease-and-desist letters because they had raised concerns. That is bullying, which is something I have experienced myself in my lifetime.”

Liliane, 1 July London anti-Theresa May demonstrator

Liliane: “I am carrying a placard with a picture of Grenfell because I saw the fire maybe 10 minutes after it had started. I saw people phoning friends inside the tower. I heard someone say, ‘I won’t see you again. Goodbye.’ The women next to me said, ‘Don’t say that.’

“My grandson was on the other side of the building, and he heard children shouting, ‘Please help me! Help me!’ He’s 18 years old and came home traumatised. He’s been crying so much.

“The people who want to save pennies are responsible for what happened at Grenfell, for the cladding. When they saw the cheaper price of the cladding did they stop to ask why? Or did they just think, well they’re only immigrants living there.

“They just wanted the tower to look pretty, that’s what it was all about. It was business people, those who want to make money. They want to blame it on people who they say were sub-letting. That’s just bullshit.

“This is definitely a crime! We want an inquest, not an inquiry. We don’t even know how many people died. I don’t even want to think about it, it’s so horrible.”

Michelle, 1 July London anti-Theresa May demonstrator

Michelle: “I’ve come down today to see the people stand together against all the injustices that have happened throughout the Tory reign.

“My placard has a picture of Grenfell Tower burning and says, ‘No one can be free, until everyone is free.’ I made this because I live in social housing in Kingston, another one of the Royal boroughs. We are the minority there. The Grenfell Tower disaster really touched my heart.

“I know it has upset people, but for me, it has lifted my own voice. Before I thought my situation is my fault. I think this tragedy highlights to the world that that is actually not the case.”

Suszan, 1 July London anti-Theresa May demonstrator

Suszan:“I am here today to seek justice for the victims of Grenfell Tower. I lost one of my closest friends there. He and his family all died there. People died there because they used cheap cladding. It’s like war between rich and poor. It’s not a matter of bad or good. It’s a class war.”

5 thoughts on “Grenfell Tower solidarity in London

  1. Monday 3rd July 2017

    posted by Morning Star in Features

    DAVID LOWRY finds an old speech by former Tory housing minister Bob Neill rather ominous

    IN THE political discussion television progammes on the Sunday just after the Grenfell Tower fire disaster, Conservative former housing minister Bob Neill appeared on the London section of the BBC’s Sunday Politics distancing himself from the horror of the towering inferno because the fire safety regulations now under question came in after he left that job.

    But six years ago, he did have some pertinent words to say at a fire safety conference. I doubt he will be proud of them today.

    Neill said: “Of course, good regulation serves to protect us all: consumers, employees and the environment. It helps build a fair society and can even save lives.

    “But over the years, regulations — and the inspections and bureaucracy that go with them — have piled up and up. This has hurt business, imposing real burdens and doing real damage to our economy.”

    He then stressed ominously: “Reducing the number of rules and regulations is therefore absolutely central to the government’s vision for Britain, removing barriers to economic growth and increasing individual freedoms.

    “We have given a clear commitment that where regulation cannot be justified, we will remove it.

    “With more than 21,000 regulations impacting on businesses and others in the UK today, this won’t be an easy task — but we’re determined to cut unnecessary red tape.”

    Neill went on to say: “We are now embarking on work with the fire sector to develop a new national framework, which will reset the relationship between fire and rescue authorities and central government.

    “We will help ‘barrier bust’ where fire and rescue authorities find unnecessary restrictions are stopping them from getting on with things that clearly make great sense.”

    After discussing fire safety guidance, he then ended by inexplicably arguing: “I am aware that some of you here today have supported calls for more regulation for fire safety in the home and in non-domestic buildings, particularly in relation to smoke alarms and sprinklers.

    “As I have explained, we have absolutely no plans to add to the burden of regulation for businesses and others, especially where non-regulatory routes can offer the same — or better — outcomes.”

    A year earlier, current Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, then an experienced back-bench London MP, spoke in a parliamentary debate on social housing in inner London.

    He stressed that “resources have to be put in consistently, over the long term. I shall concentrate on issues of social housing need — the need for a better supply of housing.

    “I recall a time when Edmonton MP Andrew Love and I were active in politics in Haringey. We were both councillors at various times and in the late 1970s we could say proudly that we would never again put children in high-rise properties, that all the new properties we built would be houses with gardens and that we would attempt to create decent community neighbourhoods.

    “I congratulate the government on the money that they have put in to estate improvements, including new roofs, new windows and new landscaping. However, the market created the housing crisis that the poorest people of London and the south-east face at present.

    “The market will not solve that crisis. It will be solved only by sufficient public investment in new housing.”

    It was a presciently sad warning.

    If we fast-forward to May 11 last year, we can see from the minutes of the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea’s housing and property scrutiny committee consideration of a report on Grenfell Tower by the borough’s director of housing.

    It stated: “The purpose of this report is to provide the [committee] with information and recommendations from the board member review of the Grenfell Tower regeneration project.” And one conclusion stated: “The group recognised that there were significant challenges with the project and acknowledged that residents would have experienced inconvenience due to the nature of this type of construction work.”

    Three years earlier, on July 16 2013, the same housing scrutiny committee considered a report on Grenfell Tower improvement works and recent power surges.

    Under a section headed “planning issues” the report noted: “In August 2012, a planning application was submitted for the refurbishment proposals to Grenfell Tower. Planners considered this application in November 2012 and have asked for a resubmission including the following amendments: removal of the canopy at first floor level; give further definition to the roof detailing; consider alternative colour schemes.”

    It concluded: “The refurbishment of Grenfell Tower is a large and complex project and time and careful planning has been required to ensure that the proposals and design of the scheme meet the requirements of residents, [the council] and planners. Particular focus has been required to ensure that the project representing value for money.”

    That is, external appearance and cost-cutting were prioritised.

    Dr David Lowry is a senior research fellow for the Institute for Resource and Security Studies.


  2. Pingback: London Grenfell Tower disaster, Australian solidarity | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: London Grenfell Tower disaster survivors interviewed | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: Grenfell Tower disaster, Londoners interviewed | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: Grenfell Tower London, other disasters threaten | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.