This video is called Britain’s MI6 linked to Libya torture scandal.
It says about itself:
7 December 2013
An Al Jazeera investigation has traced how intelligence extracted by torture in a Libyan jail cell may have been used in the British legal system. A leading Libyan politician says that he was forced to name dissidents, who were then detained by the authorities in London. Al Jazeera’s Juliana Ruhfus has this exclusive report.
By Paddy McGuffin in Britain:
Anger as Ken Clarke tries to palm off torture probe
Thursday 19th December 2013
Human rights campaigners accuse government of backtrack on its pledge to investigate British complicity in torture
Human rights campaigners reacted with anger yesterday to reports that the government is trying to backtrack on its pledge to investigate British complicity in torture.
In July 2010, David Cameron announced that an independent, judge-led inquiry would be established to examine the grave allegations amid mounting evidence.
However it has been reported that Cabinet Office Minister Ken Clarke will announce today that the task is to be handed over to the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC), a body made up of MPs and peers appointed by the Prime Minister.
Despite being tasked with oversight of the intelligence services, the ISC has been heavily criticised for failing to spot a number of recent scandals and controversies.
Legal action charity Reprieve points out that in 2007, three years after the MI6-orchestrated “rendition” of Libyan dissidents Abdel Hakim Belhadj and Sami al-Saadi, along with their families, the ISC produced a report which claimed there was “no evidence that the UK agencies were complicit in any ‘extraordinary rendition‘ operations.”
The charity also cited the “pantomime” of the committee’s toothless questioning of the heads of MI5, MI6 and GCHQ in the wake of the recent US NSA surveillance scandal.
While hailed by the government as a major step forward for security service transparency there was little in the way of probing questioning and it subsequently emerged that the spy chiefs had been provided with the questions in advance.
None of the ISC members are judges, although it includes a former defence secretary, a former Home Office minister, and a former cabinet secretary under Tony Blair.
Reprieve executive director Clare Algar said: “If the government takes this course, it will be breaking its promise to hold a genuine, independent inquiry into UK involvement in torture.
“Worse still, it will be handing the task to a committee of MPs hand-picked by the Prime Minister, which has consistently missed major scandals involving the security services.
“The ISC not only lacks independence, it has also sadly been proven to be completely hopeless as a watchdog.
“David Cameron, Nick Clegg and Ken Clarke have all personally pledged to hold an independent, judge-led inquiry into torture. They must not abandon their promise in favour of a whitewash.”
- UK inquiry on rendition and torture to be handed to ISC (theguardian.com)
- British spies ‘knew about torture of FORTY terror suspects’: Judge’s inquiry identifies concerns over 9/11 interrogations (dailymail.co.uk)
- Britain’s MI6 linked to Libya torture scandal (aljazeera.com)
- Torture inquiry ‘finds UK intelligence officers knew of mistreatment’ (theguardian.com)
- ISC Acquires UK Torture Inquiry (technologyka.wordpress.com)
Reblogged this on gingerblokeblog.
Thanks for reblogging!
Pingback: British government torture scandal cover-up | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Tony Blair in CIA torture flights scandal | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: British government accused of helping monarchist torturers in Nepal | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: British government’s Libyan torture scandal | Dear Kitty. Some blog