US helicopter killed British soldier in Afghanistan

This video is called Wikileaks: Canadian soldiers ‘killed’ in friendly fire.

From the Press Association in Britain:

‘Failures’ led to UK soldier death

Friday 7th September 2012

A 23-year-old soldier who was killed when a US Apache helicopter fired on a British base in Afghanistan died as a result of “mistaken beliefs and cumulative failures”, a coroner has ruled.

Lance Corporal Christopher Roney, from Sunderland, died from head injuries at Patrol Base Almas in Sangin on December 21 2009.

After a five-day hearing, Sunderland Coroner Derek Winter listed a series of errors made leading up to the tragedy.

He ruled: “L/Cpl Christopher Roney died as a consequence of assumptions made, mistaken beliefs and cumulative failures by friendly forces to appropriately assess the totality of their situational awareness in respect of the ongoing events at and in the vicinity of Patrol Base Almas on December 21 2009. The deployment and use by friendly forces of attack helicopters was done in circumstances that ought to have been assessed by them to conclude sooner than they did that their target was not an enemy force and that the attack should be aborted.”

L/Cpl Roney, of 3rd Battalion The Rifles, died from head injuries he suffered while manning a position at Patrol Base Almas, in Sangin, Helmand, on December 21 2009.

As night fell, the base was rocked by a huge Taliban bomb and the platoon based there were fighting off an attack when, without their knowledge, two US gunships were called in to help. But one fired 200 rounds into the base – despite the flagpole, machine gun, barbed wire and men in uniform – as the air crews believed it was an enemy position and carried out two strafing runs.

There was harrowing evidence from soldiers on the ground, who could not understand where the devastating onslaught was coming from. Senior British Army staff – not based in Almas – liaised with the Apaches and mistakes were made when the crews were given a series of grid references and told there were no friendly forces in the vicinity. There was also confusion over pictures relayed from two cameras – one of which was mounted on an unmanned drone.

Statements from the four unnamed pilots and co-pilots were read out during the inquest. The coroner heard tales of heroism as comrades raced to help the seven badly injured soldiers – the most serious casualty being L/Cpl Roney, who was married to Lorna and whose son William was then five months old. He was flown to Camp Bastion but could not survive his terrible injuries and died the next day.

U.S. to Retain Role as a Jailer in Afghanistan: here.

Overnight on August 30, an Afghan army sergeant shot dead three Australian soldiers at an Afghan National Army patrol base in the Oruzgan province of Afghanistan. A helicopter crash that killed two more soldiers made the day the deadliest for Australia’s forces since the Vietnam War: here.

Almost two and half years ago, I wrote about the murder of Abdul Manan Gul Rehman in a CIA black site facility known as the Salt Pit in Afghanistan. The news that he had been killed was received eight years after the fact: here.

US Military: Oops, we lost $475 million worth of records: here.

Johnny Barber, War Is a Crime: “On the streets of Kabul it is not unusual to see burqa-clad women clutching starving children, begging for spare change. Poverty and hunger is even worse in Kandahar and Helmand, areas that have seen some of the most intense fighting of the war…. In America, 35 million people are hungry or do not know where their next meal is coming from and 13 million of them are children. Who benefits from the ‘War on Terror?'” Here.

10 thoughts on “US helicopter killed British soldier in Afghanistan

  1. Terrible stiff – but then that’s why we are against war in all its manifestations. A friend of mine served in Iraq – he told me when US vehicles came by them on the road they just got quickly as afar away as possible so not as to be shot up or run off the road.


  2. U.S. watchdog questions spending for Afghan army

    By PAULINE JELINEK / Associated Press

    Posted: 09/11/2012 03:00:00 AM EDT

    Tuesday September 11, 2012

    WASHINGTON — The watchdog for U.S. spending in Afghanistan says lax accountability in a $1.1 billion program supplying fuel to the Afghan National Army needs “immediate attention” before control of the program is turned over to the Kabul government in less than four months.

    There’s no proof the fuel is actually being used by Afghan security forces for their missions, meaning it’s not known how much fuel has been lost, stolen or diverted to the insurgency, according to a report released Monday by Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction John F. Sopko.

    The report is the latest bad news surrounding a key element of the U.S. exit strategy for Afghanistan. Washington has spent billions of dollars on the international coalition’s effort to train and equip Afghan forces it hopes eventually will be able to fight the Taliban on their own. The new report comes on top of growing questions in recent weeks about how recruits are vetted for the Afghan forces — questions prompted by a spike in insider attacks in which Afghan soldiers, police or impersonators have killed 45 international service members this year, mostly Americans.

    The report also found:

    — An audit of the spending is being hampered because someone shredded financial records covering $475 million in fuel payments over more than four years and officials inexplicably couldn’t provide complete records for a fifth year.

    — There
    is insufficient justification for the ever-ballooning budget requests for fuel that have been made by the command managing NATO’s mission to equip and train Afghan forces.

    — Millions of dollars in the proposed funding should be cut until international forces figure out how many vehicles and generators the Afghan security forces are actually using and how much fuel is needed for those vehicles and for power plants.

    U.S. defense and military officials did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the findings. But the report contained written comments from commanders provided to the inspector general’s office that rejected the idea of reducing their budget and argued that accurate estimates of fuel use are not possible as the international coalition works to rapidly grow the Afghan forces.

    Recently, 10,000 to 15,000 individuals have been recruited each month into the Afghan army and police forces, which are expanding from about 100,000 in 2007 to a goal of 352,000 next month.

    Training forces to fight is just one piece of the effort. Sopko’s office was auditing the army’s ability to also handle its own logistics. Specifically, auditors were trying to determine how well the army can buy, manage, store and distribute diesel, aviation and other fuels needed to power vehicles, generators and power plants. The U.S. budgeted $1.1 billion for fuel in budget years 2007 thru 2012 and has been managing the deliveries by vendors to hundreds of sites around the country.

    But international forces are planning Jan. 1 to transfer of responsibility for the program to the Afghans, meaning money for fuel will go directly to the corruption-plagued Afghan government, replacing the system in which the international coalition buys the products and arranges for vendor deliveries.

    “A supportable and sustainable logistics capability — including the ability to purchase, track and account for (the fuel products) — is an essential part of transferring security responsibilities,” the report said. Unless funding levels are based on accurate estimates of need and unless effective controls are put in place before the transition date, both the fuel and U.S. taxpayer funds “will be vulnerable to theft and waste,” it said.

    The coalition moved to tighten some controls after being briefed in May about auditor concerns; but the action was not enough, according to Sopko so he decided to issue an interim report now.

    “We believe these issues warrant immediate attention,” the report stated.

    The funding request for the program was $306 million this year and commanders said have said they need $466 million for budget year 2013 and $555 million for 2014 and beyond. Sopko urged capping the budget at $306 million until there is better justification for additional money.

    In its written response, the international training mission said that would mean a 37 percent drop in combat operations, border patrols and other missions.

    “Fuel consumption estimates for vehicle usage cannot be determined accurately … due to the continuing fielding of vehicles, power generation” and other equipment, the military’s written response said, adding that over 25,000 vehicles and generators had been issued to the Afghans since 2010.

    It said that as coalition forces withdraw from Afghanistan and Afghans take on greater responsibility, the need will keep increasing.

    Massachusetts Rep. John Tierney, the top Democrat on the House Oversight and Government Reform national security subcommittee, on Monday called the lack of oversight unacceptable.

    The Defense Department and NATO “should work together immediately to establish clear guidelines to ensure that this money is not misused,” he said in a statement. “These problems must be fixed before the command transfers responsibility for these contracts to the Afghan National Army and provides hundreds of millions of dollars directly to the Afghan government.”


  3. Pingback: Libyan NATO allies kill US diplomats | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: British royalty, army and media in Afghanistan | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: US Republicans for endless Afghan war | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: Stop Afghan war, dead soldiers’ families say | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: Afghans demonstrate against murderous US-backed warlord | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: United States killing its allies in Afghanistan | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: Trump threatens to ‘kill 10 million Afghans’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: Syrian villagers drive away Trump’s occupation soldiers | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.