British army torturers in Iraq

This British TV video says about itself:

Dispatches, Channel 4’s flagship current affairs strand, exposes the full and unreported horror of the Iraqi conflict and its aftermath, revealing the true scale of civilian casualties; and allegations that after the scandal of Abu Ghraib, American soldiers continued to abuse prisoners; and that US forces did not systematically intervene in the torture and murder of detainees by the Iraqi security services. The programme also features previously unreported material of insurgents being killed while trying to surrender.

From British daily The Morning Star:

Grisly details of ‘choir’ torture

Thursday 16 July 2009

by Paddy McGuffin at Finlaison House

The public inquiry into the death of Iraqi hotel worker Baha Mousa heard evidence on Thursday of a grotesque form of torture known as “the choir.”

During the practice, soldiers would strike each detainee in turn forcing them to emit a sound in a gross parody of a musical instrument or singing group.

Charles De Coster, in his famous novel Thyl Ulenspiegel, described a similar “musical” torture instrument, played by 16th century Spanish king Philip II. In that case, for torturing cats; probably fictional. Though Philip II had very many people tortured by the inquisition.

The evidence was introduced during the opening statement by Mr Gerard Elias QC for the inquiry on Thursday.

Much of the information revealed was brought to light during the previous courts martial of a number of British soldiers, but that evidence was heard behind closed doors.

This is the first time much of the information has been placed in the public domain.

Mr Elias was referring to a witness statement from a soldier who is due to testify to the inquiry that he heard screams coming from the interrogation area and, on investigation, saw troops punch and kick several detainees, including Mr Mousa.

He said he had also witnessed “the choir” which, Mr Elias stated, was apparently carried out for the amusement of the troops.

Elsewhere, Mr Elias said there were concerns regarding the “paucity” of some of the accused soldiers’ witness statements. He said that “even making allowances” for other experiences of a hostile operational tour, “one might expect” that the events of September 14-16 2003 would be ones “not easily forgotten.”

The inquiry was also shown graphic video evidence of hooded and bound detainees being brutalised by a British army soldier.

Mr Elias’s opening statement is expected to continue for some weeks. The inquiry will then hear witness evidence, including that of soldiers and surviving detainees.

The public inquiry into the death of Iraqi hotel worker Baha Mousa in British army custody and the torture of six other Iraqis began its first proper phase this week: here.

Abuse of Iraqi prisoners reveals a lack of discipline among UK troops and arrogance at the MoD: here.

A public inquiry into the killing of Iraqi civilian Baha Mousa by British soldiers in September 2003 opened in London on July 13: here.

The British soldiers responsible for the death of an Iraqi detainee were not just “a few bad apples”, a public inquiry heard today: here.

A witness to the inquiry into the death by torture in British custody of an Iraqi hotel receptionist spoke on Monday of the horrendous abuse he suffered at the hands of British troops: here.

A soldier who stole money from an Iraqi hotel safe and whose exposure may have led to the death of Baha Mousa has claimed that he only took a small amount of money to make a “collage”: here.

An Iraqi anti war activist on the war: here.

Prisoners at the main US detention camp in Afghanistan [at Bagram] have refused to leave their cells to shower or exercise for the past two weeks in protest at their indefinite imprisonment without charge: here. And here.

AFGHANISTAN: Afghan mothers give children opium (video): here. And here.

1 thought on “British army torturers in Iraq

  1. Iraq government faces claims of prisoner abuse

    by deb riechmann and bushra juhi, Associated Press

    In this Aug. 11, 2007 file photo, blindfolded prisoners are taken for questioning at the Iraqi National Police Detention Center in the Kazimiyah neighborhood of North Baghdad, Iraq. Iraqi officials outraged by the abuse of prisoners at the U.S.-run Abu Ghraib prison are dealing with a prison scandal of their own as allegations continue to surface about years of torture and mistreatment inside Iraq’s own lockups. (AP Photo/Petr David Josek, File)

    Iraqi officials outraged by the abuse of prisoners at the U.S.-run Abu Ghraib prison are trying to contain a scandal of their own as allegations continue to surface of mistreatment inside Iraqi jails.

    Accounts of Iraqis being beaten with clubs, blindfolded and coerced into signing false confessions are attracting increased attention partly because the United States is getting out of the prison business in Iraq. Since a security agreement took effect Jan. 1, the U.S. has transferred 841 detainees into Iraq’s crowded prison system and more are on the way.

    Allegations of mistreatment have persisted since 2005, when U.S. troops raided an Interior Ministry lockup in a predominantly Shiite area of southeastern Baghdad and found scores of emaciated prisoners. The matter returned to the spotlight after the June 12 assassination of Sunni lawmaker Harith al-Obeidi, an outspoken advocate of prisoner rights.

    The issue is a test of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s commitment to the rule of law and to reconcile with the Sunni minority, who account for most of the prisoners held in security cases. Sunnis claim they are being unfairly targeted by security forces run by al-Maliki’s Shiite-dominated government.

    “The cases are as bad as what took place at Abu Ghraib, but it is painful when these things take place in Iraqi prisons,” said Sunni lawmaker Salim Abdullah. “We met some of those who were released and saw the scars on their skins. They use different kinds of torture like tying the shoulders and hanging the body, which normally leads to dislocation of the shoulders.”

    The allegations pale in comparison with the horrific accounts of Saddam Hussein’s prisons, where inmates were systematically beaten, jammed into tiny windowless cells and executed on the flimsiest of evidence and where men were forced to watch their wives and daughters raped.

    Still, the current Iraqi leadership came to power with the promise to hold itself to a higher standard and respect human rights.

    Iraqi officials acknowledge some abuse and insist improvements are being made. The issue, however, poses a thorny question for Americans: How can the United States transfer detainees into a system where abuse has occurred?

    The U.S. military says it sends Iraqi prisoners only to detention facilities approved by Iraq’s Ministry of Justice.

    However, Iraqi lawmakers, human rights advocates and the Human Rights Ministry claim most of the abuse is not taking place in prisons run by the Justice Ministry, but in those operated by the Interior and Defense Ministries. Prisoners there are generally accused of links to Sunni and Shiite insurgent groups.

    Abu Ali al-Rikabi, a father of five who owns a vegetable shop in Diwaniyah, said scars on his legs and back are evidence of his mistreatment at the hands of the Iraqi police who accused him of being involved with a former Shiite militia.

    “At dawn one day in November 2007, I was sleeping in my room with my wife when the Iraqi police broke in, handcuffed me and took me blindfolded to their headquarters,” al-Rikabi told The Associated Press. “As soon as they reached the place, they began beating me severely with thick clubs and batons, hitting every part of my body, especially my legs and back. They kept on doing that for three days.”

    He said he was ultimately transferred to another prison in Diwaniyah, 80 miles south of Baghdad, and was released the following October. “No one told me why I was arrested or why I was released,” he said.

    An eight-member panel that al-Maliki set up after al-Obeidi’s assassination to look into abuse is expected to complete its investigation in a month of two.

    A military spokesman, Maj. Gen. Qassim al-Moussawi, said the panel has visited three detention centers in Baghdad and will inspect others. He said most of the abuse uncovered so far took place in Rusafa prison in eastern Baghdad.

    At a human rights symposium this month, al-Maliki said allegations would be investigated. The prime minister said detainees should have rights but that no one should ignore the victims of crime _ “orphans and the widows who lost their husbands because of terrorism.”

    “If every imprisoned person is innocent … then who has destroyed the country? Who killed people?” he asked.

    Al-Maliki’s prison investigation follows a limited Interior Ministry probe of 112 complaints of abuse. Of those, the ministry found 23 cases of human rights abuses and 20 cases where inmates were incarcerated without warrants. Interior Minister Jawad al-Bolani said 43 police officers face charges.

    A 2008 report by the Human Rights Ministry identified 307 cases of alleged torture and ill-treatment among 26,249 detainees in Iraqi custody at the end of last year. The Iraqi prison population has risen to nearly 30,000 since then and is slated to grow as the U.S. either releases or transfers its remaining 10,429 detainees.

    The ministry report stated that most of mistreatment occurs when the detainee is first arrested and taken to facilities run by combat soldiers and not trained prison guards.

    “It’s an uncomfortable place to be in an (Iraqi) Ministry of Defense facility,” said David King, a British adviser to Iraq’s Ministry of Defense. “They are very overcrowded and they are very poorly equipped.”

    King said, however, that the Iraqi government was interested in improving the system and supplying clean bedding and clothing and allowing relatives to visit detainees.

    That’s little consolation to Iraqis who say they have been abused.

    Mohammed al-Obeidi, 28, a Sunni, told the AP that he was selling mobile phones in a rented shop in Amiriyah, 25 miles west of Baghdad, when Iraqi soldiers arrived in Humvees and apprehended him and six others in 2006. He said they were taken to a prison in northern Baghdad where he was blindfolded and handcuffed during interrogation.

    “The investigation officer used to tell me to confess that I was a terrorist and was planting roadside bombs,” said al-Obeidi, who was never charged and was released for lack of evidence. “They used insults and sectarian slander. They normally tied me to a hook on the ceiling to keep me hanging, and then they were beating me with electric sticks. In one of these investigation sessions, my left shoulder was dislocated.”

    Politicians loyal to Muqtada al-Sadr, a firebrand anti-American Shiite cleric, also are pressuring the government on the issue. Al-Sadr’s followers were rounded up in droves last year as part of a government crackdown against militia fighters.

    Sadrist lawmaker Falah Hassan Shanshal said he visited a month ago with detainees facing the death sentence.

    “One of them was 22 years old. He was crying and asked to talk to me in private,” Shanshal said. “He told me that officers raped him and abused him sexually and then forced him to confess things he did not commit.”

    “These officers were committing the same violation conducted during the former regime,” he said.

    Copyright 2009 The Associated Press.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.