This video from the United States House of Representatives is called Waxman Excoriates Bush Record On Iraq, Torture, Environment.
From Ryan Grim’s blog in the USA:
George Bush Book ‘Decision Points‘ Lifted Passages From Advisers’ Books
First Posted: 11-12-10 01:48 PM | Updated: 11-12-10 02:13 PM
When Crown Publishing inked a deal with George W. Bush for his memoirs, the publisher knew it wasn’t getting Faulkner. But the book, at least, promises “gripping, never-before-heard detail” about the former president’s key decisions, offering to bring readers “aboard Air Force One on 9/11, in the hours after America’s most devastating attack since Pearl Harbor; at the head of the table in the Situation Room in the moments before launching the war in Iraq,” and other undisclosed and weighty locations.
Crown also got a mash-up of worn-out anecdotes from previously published memoirs written by his subordinates, from which Bush lifts quotes word for word, passing them off as his own recollections. He took equal license in lifting from nonfiction books about his presidency or newspaper or magazine articles from the time. Far from shedding light on how the president approached the crucial “decision points” of his presidency, the clip jobs illuminate something shallower and less surprising about Bush’s character: He’s too lazy to write his own memoir.
Bush, on his book tour, makes much of the fact that he largely wrote the book himself, guffawing that critics who suspected he didn’t know how to read are now getting a comeuppance. Not only does Bush know how to read, it turns out, he knows how to Google, too. Or his assistant does. Bush notes in his acknowledgments that “[m]uch of the research for this book was conducted by the brilliant and tireless Peter Rough. Peter spent the past 18 months digging through archives, searching the internet[s], and sifting through reams of paper.” Bush also collaborated on the book with his former speechwriter, Christopher Michel.
Many of Bush’s literary misdemeanors exemplify pedestrian sloth, but others are higher crimes against the craft of memoir. In one prime instance, Bush relates a poignant meeting between Afghan President Hamid Karzai and a Tajik warlord on Karzai’s Inauguration Day. It’s the kind of scene that offers a glimpse of a hopeful future for the beleaguered nation. Witnessing such an exchange could color a president’s outlook, could explain perhaps Bush’s more optimistic outlook and give insight into his future decisions. Except Bush didn’t witness it. Because he wasn’t at Karzai’s inauguration.
His absence doesn’t stop Bush from relating this anecdote: “When Karzai arrived in Kabul for his inauguration on December 22 – 102 days after 9/11 – several Northern Alliance leaders and their bodyguards greeted him at an airport. As Karzai walked across the tarmac alone, a stunned Tajik warlord asked where all his men were. Karzai, responded, ‘Why, General, you are my men. All of you who are Afghans are my men.'”
That meeting would sound familiar to Ahmed Rashid, author of “The Mess in Afghanistan”, who wrote: “At the airport to receive [Karzai] was the warlord General Mohammad Fahim, a Tajik from the Panjshir Valley …. As the two men shook hands on the tarmac, Fahim looked confused. ‘Where are your men?’ he asked. Karzai turned to him in his disarmingly gentle manner of speaking. ‘Why General,” he replied, “you are my men–all of you are Afghans and are my men.'”
Bush’s lifting of the anecdote, while disappointing on a literary level, does raise the intriguing possibility that Bush actually read Rashid’s book. Doubtful. It was excerpted in the Googleable New York Review of Books. (Still, thinking of Bush browsing the NYRB’s Website almost makes it worthwhile.)
In a separate case of scene fabrication, though, Bush writes of a comment made by his rival John McCain as if it was said to him directly. “The surge gave [McCain] a chance to create distance between us, but he didn’t take it. He had been a longtime advocate of more troops in Iraq, and he supported the new strategy wholeheartedly. “I cannot guarantee success,” he said, “But I can guarantee failure if we don’t adopt this new strategy.” A dramatic and untold coming-together of longtime rivals? Well, not so much. It comes straight from a Washington Post story. McCain was talking to reporters, not to Bush.
In most instances of Bush’s literary swiping, he was at least present for the scene. But the point of a memoir is that it is the author’s version of events. Bush’s book is a collection of other people’s versions of events. But that’s not what Bush promises readers. “Decision Points is based primarily on my recollections. With help from researchers, I have confirmed my account with government documents, personal interviews, news reports, and other sources, some of which remain classified,” he offers. Bush, in his memoir, confesses to authorizing waterboarding, which is a war crime, so the lifting of a few passages might seem like a minor infraction. But Bush’s laziness undermines the historical value of the memoir. Bush “recollects” – in a more literal sense of the term – quotes by pulling his and others verbatim from other books, calling into question what he genuinely remembers from the time and casting doubt on any conclusions he draws about what his mindset was at the time.
In a final irony, Bush appears to draw heavily from several of Bob Woodward’s books and also from Robert Draper’s “Dead Certain”. The Bush White House called the books’ accuracy into question when they were initially published.
The similarities between the way Bush recollects his and other quotes may be a case of remarkable random chance or evidence that he and his deputies were in an almost supernatural sync. If so, he essentially shares a brain with General Tommy Franks.
Bush writes: “Tommy told the national security team that he was working to apply the same concept of a light footprint to Iraq… ‘If we have multiple, highly skilled Special Operations forces identifying targets for precision-guided munitions, we will need fewer conventional grounds forces,’ he said. ‘That’s an important lesson learned from Afghanistan.’ I had a lot of concerns. … I asked the team to keep working on the plan. ‘We should remain optimistic that diplomacy and international pressure will succeed in disarming the regime,’ I said at the end of the meeting. ‘But we cannot allow weapons of mass destruction to fall into the hands of terrorists. I will not allow that to happen.'”
Franks, in his memoir American Soldier, writes: “‘For example, if we have multiple, highly skilled Special Operations forces identifying targets for precision-guided munitions, we will need fewer conventional ground forces. That’s an important lesson learned from Afghanistan.’ President Bush’s questions continued throughout the briefing…. Before the VTC ended, President Bush addressed us all. ‘We should remain optimistic that diplomacy and international pressure will succeed in disarming the regime.’ … The President paused. ‘Protecting the security of the United States is my responsibility,’ he continued. ‘But we cannot allow weapons of mass destruction to fall into the hands of terrorists.’ He shook his head. ‘I will not allow that to happen.'”
A Crown official rejected the suggestion that Bush had done anything inappropriate, suggesting that the similarities speak to its inherent accuracy. The editor of Bush’s book wasn’t immediately able to comment.
But if you already bought Bush’s book thinking you were getting only his own thoughts, you haven’t entirely wasted your money. Finding lifted passages in Bush’s book is like an Easter egg hunt. Look for passages with a number of quotes back to back and then slap the passage into Google Books or plagiarism detection software you might have access to. The slideshow below shows what HuffPost has found so far. If you find any more, send the passage to firstname.lastname@example.org and we’ll verify it and add it to the list.
See also here.
Bush too lazy to write own memoir, lifted passages from his advisers’ books: here.
Be Subversive: Move Bush’s Memoir to the Crime Section at Your Local Bookstore: here.
George W. Bush Allowed Texas Man to Be Put to Death Because of Someone Else’s DNA: here.
UN Torture Rapporteur: ‘Couldn’t Be More Clear’ That Waterboarding Is Torture, ‘Immoral and Illegal’: here.
British officials said today there was no evidence to support claims by George Bush, the former US president, that information extracted by “waterboarding” saved British lives by foiling attacks on Heathrow airport and Canary Wharf. In his memoirs, Bush said the practice – condemned by Downing Street as torture – was used in CIA interrogations of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the alleged mastermind of the 9/11 attacks on the US: here.
When no raindrops follow the rainmakers’ dance, they claim the dance was not properly performed. Our generals are using the same rationale to keep our engagement going in Afghanistan: here.
Several thousand Christians from across Europe gathered in Brussels on Saturday to protest against a recent escalation of violence against followers of the religion in Iraq: here.
Britain: 105-year-old anti-war activist Hetty Bower still marching for peace on Iraq and Tony Blair. VIDEO: here.
Pak journalist disappointed over Bush’s ‘plagiarism’
London | November 17, 2010 12:01:13 AM IST
Ahmed Rashid, one of Pakistan’s most respected journalists, has said that he is disappointed that parts of his work appear to have been plagiarized by former US President George W Bush.
Rashid said that it was never a compliment when politicians plagiarize ideas or comments from journalists without acknowledging their work.
A US website said last week that Bush’s book was remarkably similar to previously published writings.
Bush released his memoir Decision Points earlier this month.
The former president has not commented on the allegations, but his publisher was reported last week as saying that if there were similarities in his work with that of other writers, it only confirms the accuracy of ‘Decision Points’.
Part of Bush’s book recounts a meeting between Afghan President Hamid Karzai and a Tajik warlord on the Afghan president’s inauguration day.
The former president used the encounter as an example of hope for the future of the country.
“When Karzai arrived in Kabul for his inauguration on 22 December – 102 days after 9/11 – several Northern Alliance leaders and their bodyguards greeted him at an airport,” he wrote.
“As Karzai walked across the tarmac alone, a stunned Tajik warlord asked where all his men were.
“Karzai responded: ‘Why, General, you are my men. All of you who are Afghans are my men.'”
The US-based Huffington Post website said that this account and the quote were lifted almost verbatim and without attribution from a New York Review of Books article by Ahmed Rashid.
In a statement released to the BBC News website, Rashid said that he was not happy that his work had been copied.
“You would expect an American president’s researchers to come up with an acknowledgement, at least if they wanted to lift somebody else’s articles or comments,” he said.
“Unfortunately neither President Bush nor his researchers paid me that compliment nor have they apologised since the quote was spotted some days ago.”
Rashid said that he had been “offered all sorts of advice” to rectify the matter.
“My children and their friends and some journalist colleagues want me to sue him,” he joked, “but I told them I would do no such thing.”
“Other friends and colleagues have said it was a big joke, but in all seriousness I am not laughing.
“It is never a compliment when politicians plagiarise ideas or comments from journalists without acknowledging their work.
Unfortunately it happens all the time.” Rashid added. (ANI)
Pingback: Banned ‘burqa’ not a burqa at all | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Strauss-Kahn arrested, how about Bush (and Libya)? | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: British Conservative says Bush, stay out of Europe | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Tony Blair at London Iraq war inquiry, 21 January | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Dutch government’s Islamophobic anti-women plan | Dear Kitty. Some blog