This video from the USA says about itself:
Caroline Elkins – Colonial War Crimes in Kenya: Prospects for Reconciliation.
By Paddy McGuffin in England:
Crimes of empire revealed
Wednesday 18 April 2012
The government was forced to admit in January 2011 that 8,800 files had been secretly “migrated” to Britain from colonies prior to their independence.
Its admission followed a High Court case brought by four elderly Kenyans who alleged they had suffered torture and brutality at the hands of British forces.
The 1,200 records published today are the first of six tranches due to be made public at the National Archives by November 2013.
The papers cover controversial episodes including the 1950s Mau Mau uprising in Kenya and the Malayan “emergency” – in which the Daily Worker exposed atrocities by British troops against communist freedom fighters.
They also revealed efforts to destroy and reclassify sensitive files.
The Foreign Office claimed it was releasing “every paper” it can.
But David Anderson, an adviser to the Kenyans and professor of African history at Oxford University, said there was still a “lurking culture of secrecy.”
“The British government did lie about this earlier on. This saga was both a colonial conspiracy and a bureaucratic bungle,” he said.
“It is shocking that their release has taken over 50 years and took the claim brought by our four Mau Mau clients before these sensitive documents were ‘found.’
“More so-called ‘top secret’ files which are relevant to the case are still missing and we call on the FCO to renew their efforts to find those documents.”
Only a third of the Kenyan files were released today but a memo dated May 1961 sets out the criteria under which papers were to be “migrated.”
Then-colonial secretary Iain Macleod said the aim was to ensure no files were passed to a post-independence regime which might “embarrass” the British or other governments, members of the police, military forces, public servants or police informers, “might compromise sources of intelligence information” or “might be used unethically by ministers in the successor government.”