British Conservatives against sea eagles


This video says about itself:

A young White-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) feasting on fish with Hooded crows (Corvus cornix) lurking around for bits and pieces.

Footage recorded from a hide (Saker2) at Hortobágy National Park, Hungary with a Nikon D300s+Nikkor 300/2.8 AF-S VR.

From British daily The Independent:

Scheme to return sea eagles to Suffolk falls victim to budget cuts

By Michael McCarthy, Environment Editor

Monday, 14 June 2010

A controversial project to reintroduce sea eagles to southern England has been scrapped in the first of the government budget cuts to impact on the natural environment.

The majestic predators have been successfully reintroduced into the Scottish islands, after being driven to extinction in Britain nearly a century ago. But this morning Natural England, the Government’s wildlife agency, will announce that it is pulling out of a long-running scheme to bring back a breeding population of the birds to the coastline of Suffolk.

Ministers have made clear to Natural England that the £900,000 the project was expected to cost over six years will not be forthcoming. However, there is more to the decision than that.

The plan to bring back Britain’s biggest birds of prey – they have eight-foot wingspans – to coastal East Anglia has been extremely unpopular with some of the region’s farmers and landowners, who have feared for the safety of their livestock, and the decision to scrap it has been taken by Jim Paice, the Conservative Agriculture Minister, who is himself an East Anglian farmer.

Natural England officials and biologists, from the top down, are extremely disappointed at the cancellation of what they saw as a wonderful addition to England’s bird life, much along the lines of the successful reintroduction of the red kite in the 1990s. They had just received the results of a feasibility study showing the re-establishment of a sea eagle population in Suffolk was possible, and were about to embark on a public consultation exercise about the scheme.

Also unhappy is the agency’s partner in the project, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds. “We are very disappointed, because this is a great project, and we think most people in Suffolk are behind it,” said Mark Avery, the RSPB’s conservation director. “Many Suffolk businesses would benefit from the increased tourism revenue these birds would bring.

“We are also afraid that this is just the first of many damaging cuts that will impact on the natural environment over the next weeks and months.”

The sea eagle, Haliaeetus albicilla, also known as the white-tailed eagle, once bred all over Britain from the Isle of Wight to the Shetlands. It is much more of a lowland and coastal bird than the golden eagle of the Scottish Highlands. But it had been persecuted to extinction in England by the 19th century and retreated to a last stronghold in the Hebrides, where Victorian collectors further hunted it until it disappeared. The last nest was seen in 1916; the last native British sea eagle was shot, on Skye, two years later.

However, in 1975 a reintroduction scheme was begun with young birds from Norway being released on the island of Rum, and several years later the first breeding took place on the Isle of Mull. There are now more than 30 breeding pairs, which are a considerable tourist attraction in some places, as the birds are a spectacular sight. They mainly feed on carrion, fish and small mammals but they occasionally also take lambs.

The Natural England scheme intended to reintroduce the birds on the area of mixed heath, forest and farmland of the Suffolk coast known as the Sandlings, centring on the RSPB flagship reserve of Minsmere. The plan envisaged bringing young birds from Poland to Suffolk at the rate of 20 a year for five years, beginning in 2011.

Dr Avery said he did not think farmers’ fears of livestock losses were justified. “This bird is not seen as a pest elsewhere in Europe, where it is very common,” he said. “This is fear of the unknown, rather than well-grounded worries.”

See also here.

New study says white-tailed eagles are worth at least £5m pa to Mull’s economy through tourism: here.

Guardian poll shows big majority in favour of white-tailed eagles: here.

June 2010. It’s the split-second moment when a buzzard mobbing a white-tailed eagle on the Isle of Mull had serious second thoughts. Mull photographer Iain Erskine, who holds a special licence, captured the image while accompanying an RSPB Scotland team to a nest where eaglets were to be ringed: here.

Mull Sea eagle watch moves to new location: here.

Storm damages Dutch sea eagle nest: here.

Further nine Norwegian White-tailed Eagles take to the skies of Killarney: here.

Large-scale wind farm establishment may have a negative effect on Sweden’s golden eagles. In a unique project in northern Sweden, scientists at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) are trapping adult golden eagles and fitting them with satellite transmitters: here.

December 2010. There has been outrage expressed by wildlife conservation charities, RSPB, the Golden Eagle Trust and BirdWatch Ireland at the poisoning of a golden eagle in Ireland: here.

2 thoughts on “British Conservatives against sea eagles

  1. Pingback: Anti-war demonstration in London | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  2. Pingback: Scottish eagles news update | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.