Canadian workers against Afghanistan war

This video is called Searching for a Canadian development project in Afghanistan.

By Michael Skinner:

Canadian workers demand immediate end to war in Afghanistan (+ video)

On 29 May 2009, the delegates at the national convention of the Canadian Labour Congress (CLC), representing more than 3 million workers from every region of Canada and Quebec, voted overwhelmingly to demand that the government of Canada immediately end its participation in the illegal war in Afghanistan.

This CLC demand represents a significant consolidation of labour power. Several national unions, notably the Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW) and the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE), had already adopted policies to oppose Canada’s participation in the war in Afghanistan. However, some powerful unions whose members work in the rapidly expanding Canadian military and development industries could profit from continuing the war. The women and men of these unions made the difficult decision to stand in solidarity with the working people of Afghanistan rather than act on self-interest.

The Afghan war and the Canadian military

The ongoing war in Afghanistan continues to kill uncounted thousands of Afghan civilians and cause immeasurable suffering due to horrendous injuries, the displacement of people from their homes and livelihoods, home invasions, arbitrary arrests and torture, sexual abuse and the general humiliation of Afghans. This is an illegal war that cannot be justified by a few extra jobs for Canadian workers.

Since the war in Afghanistan began, Canada has become the sixth largest military exporter in the world, according to data collected by the US Congressional Research Service.

16 thoughts on “Canadian workers against Afghanistan war

  1. Hi:
    I am doing a documentary on Canadian war veterans. It is about the harms of war on people. If you know of any war veteran who would like to share their story with us, please contact me.


  2. Pingback: Afghan woman athlete a refugee, not an Olympian | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: Mass arrests in Quebec | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: Canadian mass pro-civil liberties movement | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: Refugees from Iraq, Afghan wars in Germany | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: US bombs kill Afghan civilians again | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: German President admits Afghan war is for big business | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: Afghan mothers, children, dying | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: Somalian woman Olympian drowned in NATO’s Libyan war | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: Back from Afghanistan, Canadian veterans in trouble | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: Canadian troops kill Afghan children | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: U.S. soldiers poisoned in Iraq, Afghanistan | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: Canadian blood for Afghan gas pipeline | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  14. Pingback: Woman pilot flees Afghanistan | Dear Kitty. Some blog

    > Right-To-Work Legislation Could Come To Canada, Opposition Warns
    > AP
    > Drew Dobson, of Coleman, Mich., protests at a rally at the State Capitol in Lansing, Mich., Tuesday, Dec. 11, 2012. The crowd is protesting right-to-work legislation passed last week. Michigan could become the 24th state with a right-to-work law next week. Rules required a five-day wait before the House and Senate vote on each other’s bills; lawmakers are scheduled to reconvene Tuesday and Gov. Snyder has pledged to sign the bills into law. (AP Photo/Paul Sancya)p
    > OTTAWA – The federal opposition parties are warning that so-called “right-to-work” legislation that has passed in Michigan could soon come to Canada.
    > Thousands of people in that state protested Tuesday as the first of two laws designed to weaken union power passed in Michigan’s Republican-dominated House of Representatives.
    > Opponents of the law, including U.S. President Barack Obama, say the law only gives workers the right to work for less pay.
    > Ottawa-area Conservative MP Pierre Poilievre has already been calling for new rules allowing union members to opt out of paying dues.

    > The proposal is similar to the legislation adopted in Michigan and 23 other states south of the border — as well as a private members bill proposed earlier this year by Conservative backbencher Russ Heibert.
    > His financial transparency bill, which was being debated Tuesday in the House of Commons and will likely go to a final vote Wednesday, would require unions to disclose how much money they spend on political activities.
    > Labour Minister Lisa Raitt said similar laws are already in effect in other parts of the world, including the U.K. and Australia.
    > “It really is for the workers to have a good understanding how their money is being spent, so they can make informed decisions on how they vote in the people that represent them,” Raitt said.
    > “It’s a fundamental part of having rights.”
    > Even if Heibert’s bill doesn’t pass, the Michigan law is likely to eventually have a ripple effect on other jurisdictions, including Canada, said New Democrat labour critic Alexandre Boulerice.
    > Interim Liberal leader Bob Rae warned that the Rand formula could be next to come under attack in Canada.
    > The formula, adopted in the 1940s, makes the payment of trade union dues mandatory in unionized workplaces, regardless of a worker’s union status.
    > Poilievre has said he’s heard directly from public servants who are not happy with how one of the country’s biggest civil service unions, the Public Service Alliance of Canada, manages its union dues.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.