Azendohsaurus is not a dinosaur


This is a reconstruction of the skull of the new species of Azendohsaurus. On top is a lateral or side view, and on the bottom, a palatal or roof of the mouth view. Note the teeth covering the palate, a highly unusual feature among reptiles, and the downturned front end of the lower jaw, a feature found independently in many herbivorous archosauromorphs. Credit: S. Nesbitt

From the American Museum of Natural History:

Demoting a dinosaur

New fossil material redefines Azendohsaurus as a peculiar early reptile

Azendohsaurus just shed its dinosaur affiliation. A careful new analysis of A. madagaskarensis—this time based on the entire skull rather than on just teeth and jaws—aligns this 230-million-year-old animal with a different and very early branch on the reptile evolutionary tree. Many aspects of Azendohsaurus are far more primitive than previously assumed, which in turn means that its plant-eating adaptations, similar to those found [among] some early dinosaurs, were developed independently. The new analysis is published in the journal Palaeontology.

“Even though this extraordinary ancient reptile looks similar to some plant-eating dinosaurs in some features of the skull and dentition, it is in fact only distantly related to dinosaurs,” says John J. Flynn, curator in the Division of Paleontology at the American Museum of Natural History. “With more complete material, we re-assessed features like the down-turned jaw and leaf-shaped teeth found in A. madagaskarensis as convergent with some herbivorous dinosaurs.”

The fossil is a member of Archosauromorpha, a group that includes birds and crocodilians but not lizards, snakes, or turtles. The type specimen of the genus Azendohsaurus was a fragmentary set of teeth and jaws found in 1972 near (and named for) a village in Morocco’s Atlas Mountains. The fossils on which the current research paper is based was discovered in the late 1990s in southwestern Madagascar. Named A. madagaskarensis, this specimen was uncovered by a team of U.S. and Malagasy paleontologists in a “red bed” that includes multiple individuals that probably perished together. This species was initially published as an early dinosaur in Science over a decade ago, but the completeness of the more recently unearthed and studied fossils has provided the first complete glimpse of what this animal looked like and was related to. A. madagaskarensis was not a dinosaur.

A. madagaskarensis lived during the period of time that dinosaurs, crocodile relatives, mammals, pterosaurs, turtles, frogs, and lizards were getting their start, and all of the continents were connected as the supercontinent Pangaea. A. madagaskarensis was 2 to 4 meters long and weighed between 20 and 50 kilos (about 44 to110 pounds). A. madagaskarensis was an efficient herbivore—”a veritable four-legged weed-whacker,” according to Flynn—with teeth modified for slicing vegetation covering not only its jaws, but also the roof of its mouth. Even though early archosaurs were commonly thought to be primarily carnivorous, A. madagaskarensis shows that traits associated with herbivory were much more widespread across archosaur reptiles.

“Now there are many more cases of herbivorous archosaurs,” says André Wyss, professor at the University of California, Santa Barbara. “We are rethinking the evolution of diet and feeding strategies, as well as the broader evolution of the group.”

“This is the way science works,” says Flynn, commenting on the reinterpretation of the fossils. “As we found and analyzed more material, it made us realize that this was a much more primitive animal and the dinosaur-like features were really the product of convergent evolution.”

Wyss adds, “In many ways Azendohsaurus ends up being a much more fantastic animal than if it simply represented a generic early dinosaur.”

Batrachotomus kupferzellensis was an extinct archosaur (an ancestor of dinosaurs), the only species of its genus. It lived in the middle of the Triassic Period in Europe, about 237-228 million years ago. So, it surely coexisted with the first primitive dinosaurs. Its first fossils were found by Johann Wegele, a fossil collector, in Kupferzell, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany, in 1977, but they were named only in 1999 by David J. Gower.

An unusual new archosauriform from the Middle–Late Triassic of southern Brazil and the monophyly of Doswelliidae: here.

Enhanced by Zemanta

1 thought on “Azendohsaurus is not a dinosaur

  1. Pingback: Early Argentinan dinosaur discovered | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.