Are ‘flatworms’ really flatworms?


This video is about Convolutriloba longifissura, an Acoela flatworm.

From Wired Science:

Animal Kingdom Gains Phylum But Loses Link

* By Brandon Keim

* February 9, 2011

A new rearrangement of the animal kingdom has expanded a little-known offshoot into a major branch, and opened a gap between relatively simple and highly complex life.

Ocean-dwelling flatworms called acoelomorphs were thought to represent one of life’s early stages, bridging primitive animals with radially symmetrical bodies, like jellyfish and sea anemones, and animals with bilaterally symmetrical bodies, from butterflies to humans.

But acoelomorphs now appear related to Xenoturbella, a bilaterally symmetrical ocean worm.

“It was nice to have this intermediate group between jellyfish and the other complicated animals. We’ve lost that,” said Max Telford, a University College London geneticist and co-author of the new analysis, published Feb. 9 in Nature.

The identity of both worms is a matter of ongoing interpretation among scientists who map life’s tree. Until the early 1990s, both were lumped with the Platyhelmine, or “true flatworm,” phylum. Then genetic data reclassified Xenoturbella as molluscs and acoelomorphs as descended from that unknown, ur-complex animal.

Over the last decade, the Xenoturbella interpretation was revealed as a mistake. It wasn’t a mollusc, but ate them; researchers had confused DNA from shellfish prey with genes from Xenoturbella itself. Thusly corrected, Xenoturbella was recognized as a phylum unto itself, clearly grouped with other bilaterally symmetrical animals.

Now Telford’s team have turned a corrective lens on the acoelomorphs. Like other phylogenists, they analyzed DNA from species in every phylum, searching for patterns of relationships and then constructing a tree to fit the data. But they made one key adjustment, tweaking their algorithms to account for the unusually high mutation rates of acoelomorphs.

“They’ve evolved much more quickly than other animals,” said Telford. “We suspected that this effect caused previous studies to put them a long way from animals with normal rates of evolution.”

This rate-adjusted analysis pulled the acoelomorphs out from the base of the tree of life, and set them down on a far branch alongside Xenoturbella. Together, the two Xenoturbella species and hundreds of acoelomorph species constitute a newly-classified phylum, which the researchers named Xenacoelomorpha.

Xenacoelomorpha is on roughly the same branch of life’s tree as sea stars, sea cucumbers and acorn worms — not the most complicated animals, but far more complex than what the acoelomorphs were thought to be.

As for what might replace acoelomorphs as a candidate for root animal status, Telford doesn’t now.

Another question raised by the findings is how and why acoelomorphs evolved in such fashion. Their ancestors were likely creatures with guts, fluid-filled cavities and gill slits. Acoelomorphs have none of these features, and are so physically primitive as to resemble researchers’ notions of how an ancient animal ought to appear.

“Now we’ve got these very simple worms nested right in the middle of the complex” animals,” said Telford. “How did they end up so simple? They must have lost a lot of complexity.”

See also here.

This video is called Leucochloridium paradoxum [a flatworm] in an amber snail.

ONE OF WORLD’S WORST INVASIVE SPECIES HAS TAKEN UP RESIDENCE IN FLORIDA Meet the New Guinea flatworm, which is a two-inch thing from your nightmares. [HuffPost]

Recent molecular phylogenetic analysis has shown that the marine animals known as peanut worms are not a separate phylum, but are definitely part of the family of annelids, also known as segmented worms. This is a classification that seemed questionable in the past in view of the fact that peanut worms – or the Sipunculidae, to give them their scientific name – have neither segments nor bristles. The latter are considered typical characteristics of annelids, which include more than 16,500 identified species and to which our common earthworm belongs. “Our molecular data clearly demonstrates that there is no doubt anymore that the Sipunculidae should be classified as members of these segmented worms,” explains Dr Bernhard Lieb of the Institute of Zoology at Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (JGU): here.

Sagartiogeton lacerates – a many tentacled anemone: here.

4 thoughts on “Are ‘flatworms’ really flatworms?

  1. Pingback: Sea cucumber biology, video | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  2. Pingback: Three new flatworm species discovered in Brazil | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: New deep sea Xenoturbella worm species discovered | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: New marine flatworm species discoveries | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.