Chagos islanders want to return home


This video says about itself:

John PilgerStealing A Nation [2004]

‘Stealing A Nation’ (2004) is an extraordinary film about the plight of the Chagos Islands, whose indigenous population was secretly and brutally expelled by British Governments in the late 1960s and early 1970s to make way for an American military base. The tragedy, which falls within the remit of the International Criminal Court as “a crime against humanity”, is told by Islanders who were dumped in the slums of Mauritius and by British officials who left behind a damning trail of Foreign Office documents.

Before the Americans came, more than 2,000 people lived on the islands in the Indian Ocean, many with roots back to the late 18th century. There were thriving villages, a school, a hospital, a church, a railway and an undisturbed way of life. The islands were, and still are, a British crown colony. In the 1960s, the government of Harold Wilson struck a secret deal with the United States to hand over the main island of Diego Garcia. The Americans demanded that the surrounding islands be “swept” and “sanitized”. Unknown to Parliament and to the US Congress and in breach of the United Nations Charter, the British Government plotted with Washington to expel the entire population.

From daily The Morning Star in Britain:

Chagossians resume battle for their Indian Ocean home

Monday 22nd June 2015

FORMER Chagos Islands residents, forcibly removed from their homeland more than 40 years ago, will take their long legal battle to Britain’s highest court today.

The Supreme Court will hear their challenge to a decision by the House of Lords which dashed hopes of a return home to the Indian Ocean islands, given over to a US air base.

In 2008, Law Lords overturned previous court decisions allowing islanders and their descendants to go back.

Olivier Bancoult, the Chagossian leader who has been fighting in the courts on behalf of the islanders, now argues that the three-to-two majority ruling in favour of the Foreign Secretary should be set aside.

Citizenfour, film on Edward Snowden, review


This video from the USA says about itself:

Bill Maher interviews filmmaker Laura Poitras about her Oscar-nominated documentary, CITIZENFOUR, in this clip from January 30, 2015. The film follows Poitras and journalist Glenn Greenwald as they travel to Hong Kong for a meeting with former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.

On 31 May 2015, I went to see the film Citizenfour.

A review of the film is here.

Before the film started, there was an introduction by Sasja Koetsier, of  Dutch movie magazine De Filmkrant.

According to Ms Koetsier, Citizenfour is in the tradition of French Cinema verité and United States Direct Cinema.

The film is about attacks of secret services, especially the United States NSA, on civil liberties, especially of people on the Internet.

There is an NSA blacklist of ‘public enemies’. On it, 1.2 million people from the USA, and many more from other countries. How do you land on that list? To become an ‘enemy of the state’ it suffices to download the Internet privacy program Tor.

Supporters of secret service spying on people use to say: ‘If you don’t have anything to hide, then you don’t need to be afraid of the NSA spies’. The reverse seems to be true, Sasja Koetsier said. ‘If you use Tor software, then that makes you a suspect to the spies’. Let us compare it to police in a street. If they see a home with curtains drawn, then police might, in a parallel to the NSA, immediately demand access to that home. It is like someone pointing a gun to your head, and then saying: ‘Don’t worry, I won’t shoot.’ What is the gun for then? one might ask. For making people practice self-censorship?

This is a 2008 satirical video by Mark Fiore from the USA; depicting privacy violations as disguising themselves as a harmless looking toy teddy bear. It says about itself:

Snuggly the Security Bear: Wiretapping is about love!

A review by Rejo Zenger in De Filmkrant points out that civil liberties violations are not limited to United States spies. The Dutch secret services would like to have the right to spy massively, including on people not suspect of any crime. Secret police of various countries exchange data. A secret service with few data will get few data in return from foreign spying organisations. So, secret services with comparatively few data will lobby in a race to the ‘top’ to be able to get as many data as the service which gets most data because they are the ‘best’ in violating civil liberties.

Laura Poitras starts the film with her own experiences. Her 2006 film My Country, My Country on the Iraq war causes her to be spied upon and her material being taken away during the making of a new film, The Oath, on Guantanamo Bay torture camp. She has to leave the USA and go to Germany.

She intended to make a third film in her series on ‘the war on terror’, this time about mass spying. In early 2013, Edward Snowden e-mailed her, at first under the pseudonym citizenfour. Later that year, Ms Poitras and Glenn Greenwald meet Snowden in Hong Kong and help him publish the files on mass privacy violations. They also help him to escape from NSA, or CIA, vengeance.

The film exposes the lies of NSA bosses to the United States Congress. When questioned about various massive spying practices, they answer ‘No. No. No’ to all questions about things which they do practice.

Glenn Greenwald’s partner David Miranda was arrested as a ‘terrorist’ at London airport. David Miranda’s sadness after this ordeal is a poignant highlight in the film.

Another ‘highlight’, or ‘lowlight’, is the destruction on the orders of British Prime Minister David Cameron and the United States ‘security’ establishment of a laptop computer with Edward Snowden’s files on the NSA spying on millions and millions of people all over the world.

An important film. Not just for people interested in Edward Snowden as an individual. Not just for people in the USA. For all people everywhere in the world who care about civil liberties.

USA: SENATE LETS PATRIOT ACT PROVISIONS EXPIRE “Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) succeeded Sunday in forcing certain controversial provisions of the Patriot Act to expire, including the NSA’s sweeping data collection program. But the lapse isn’t likely to last long. Running down the procedural clock in a sensational emergency session Sunday night, Paul left the Senate in a stalemate on the House-passed USA Freedom Act. The bill would have allowed the NSA’s controversial bulk data collection, justified under the expiring Section 215 of the Patriot Act, to continue while the intelligence community works with telecommunications companies to reform the program. The legislation failed in a last-minute vote in the Senate last week, leaving lawmakers with a mere eight hours in session before the Patriot Act provisions expired at the stroke of midnight.” [Ali Watkins & Jessica Schulberg, HuffPost]

The White House refused to reconsider its legal pursuit of Edward Snowden on Monday, while it sought to take credit for outlawing the bulk telephone surveillance programme he revealed: here.

THE US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is using a fleet of civilian aircraft registered with phoney front companies to snoop on citizens, it emerged on Monday. The powerful and shady agency was forced to admit to the domestic spying programme following a journalistic investigation by the Associated Press: here.

“USA Freedom Act”: A fig leaf for illegal spying: here.

Genocide of thousands of native American children in Canada


This video from Canada says about itself:

UNREPENTANT: Kevin Annett and Canada’s Genocide (Documentary)

7 December 2013

This award winning documentary reveals Canada’s darkest secret – the deliberate extermination of indigenous (Native American) peoples and the theft of their land under the guise of religion. This never before told history as seen through the eyes of this former minister (Kevin Annett) who blew the whistle on his own church, after he learned of thousands of murders in its Indian Residential Schools.

GET A DIGITAL DOWNLOAD: here.

First-hand testimonies from residential school survivors are interwoven with Kevin Annett’s own story of how he faced firing, de-frocking, and the loss of his family, reputation and livelihood as a result of his efforts to help survivors and bring out the truth of the residential schools.

Best Director Award at the 2006 New York Independent Film and Video Festival, and Best International Documentary at the 2006 Los Angeles Independent Film Festival

LEARN MORE here.

Produced By Louie Lawless, Kevin Annett and Lorie O’Rourke

2006

From daily The Independent in Britain:

6,000 aboriginal children died in ‘cultural genocide‘ in Canadian residential school system, officials say

‘If anybody tried to do this today, they would easily be subject to prosecution under the genocide convention’

Louis Doré

Saturday 30 May 2015

At least 6,000 aboriginal children died while in the residential school system in Canada, in a “cultural genocide”, officials have said.

Justice Murray Sinclair, Chair of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, who is responsible for studying the legacy of the residential schools, said the figure is an estimate and the true figure could be much higher.

“We think that we have not uncovered anywhere near what the total would be because the record keeping around that question was very poor,” Sinclair told Rosemary Barton of CBC‘s Power & Politics. “You would have thought they would have concentrated more on keeping track.”

The new death toll comes after comments from the chief justice of the Supreme Court, Beverley McLachlin, who said that Canada attempted to commit “cultural genocide” against aboriginal peoples.

“The most glaring blemish on the Canadian historic record relates to our treatment of the First Nations that lived here at the time of colonization,” McLachlin said.

Canada, she said, sustained an “ethos of exclusion and cultural annihilation”, an assessment which Justice Sinclair agreed with.

“I think as commissioners we have concluded that cultural genocide is probably the best description of what went on here.

“If anybody tried to do this today, they would easily be subject to prosecution under the genocide convention.”

New Dutch wildlife film, interview


This video is about the making of the sequel to the Dutch wildlife film De Nieuwe Wildernis, about the Oostvaardersplassen national park. This sequel is about the Biesbosch national park and other areas in the south-west of the Netherlands.

The video shows an interview with the producer of the film, Ignas van Schaick. It also shows some of the movie’s characters: white stork, three-spined stickleback, sea eagle.