Snakes and frogs, new research

This 2019 video from the Kruger National Park in South Africa is called Snake Swallows Frog As it Tries to Escape.

From Kyoto University in Japan:

Waiting game: Testing the patience of predators and prey

May 12, 2020

Summary: A new report shows that freezing in action when a snake and frog face off is not about fear but rather a delicate waiting game of patience, with each animal waiting for and anticipating its opponent’s actions.

‘Like a frog stared down by a snake’, goes an old Japanese expression, descrbing an animal petrified with fear.

However, it now seems that this freeze in action may not be about fear at all, but rather a delicate waiting game of life and death.

A new report from researchers at Kyoto University’s Graduate School of Science shows that this common interaction is all about patience, with each animal waiting for and anticipating its opponent’s actions.

“When predator and prey face each other, it is generally thought that the initiator has the advantage that would mediate successful capture or escape,” explains Nozomi Nishiumi, corresponding author of the report published in the Canadian Journal of Zoology.

“However, in cases involving snakes and frogs, they occasionally move extremely slowly — or almost not at all. It looks like they purposely avoid taking preemptive action.”

Nishiumi, together with colleague Akira Mori, examined how the animals’ behaviors affected the consequences of their interaction by focusing specifically on the kinematics of the snakes’ strikes and the frogs’ flight behavior.

The team analyzed the movement patterns of the Japanese striped snake, Elaphe quadrivirgata, and the black-spotted pond frog, Pelophylax nigromaculatus, both in the field and in staged encounter experiments.

“In the staged encounters we wanted to look at the disadvantages of preemptive actions by analyzing the kinematic characteristics of each animal’s movements,” explains Nishiumi.

“The field observations, on the other hand, were designed to follow the consequences of the animals’ actions and survival.”

The team found that the counteractions of each animal were often effective because the initiator’s actions were difficult to change once started. For example, if the snake initiated a strike action first, the frog would evade the attack because the trajectory of the strike could not be changed mid-movement, allowing the frog to escape safely while the snake spent time resetting its lunge posture.

Alternatively, if the frog first attempted an escape, the snake would start lunging immediately, and occasionally be able to adjust its strike direction in anticipation of the frog’s direction of movement.

“The efficacy of this waiting tactic depends on the distance between them: the closer they are the less likely the counteraction succeeds,” continues Nishiumi.

“In this regard, when approaching this critical distance, the animals appropriately switch their behaviors from waiting to taking action.”

These results suggest that a game of patience occurs between the animals, providing insight on predicting the decision-making of predators and prey.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.