‘No impunity for London Grenfell disaster corporations’


LUCY MASOUD (with megaphone) on the FBU-Justice4Grenfell march to Downing Street on the first anniversary of the London Grenfell inferno

From daily News Line in Britain:

No immunity for Grenfell companies’ – demands FBU member Lucy Masoud

7th February 2020

‘NO ONE should be immune from prosecution. The firefighters certainly weren’t and the manufacturers of the cladding definitely should not be,’ Lucy Masoud FBU member and Grenfell campaigner said yesterday.

She was responding to the news that Martin Moore-Bick, chairman of the inquiry into the Grenfell disaster, yesterday said he would be writing to the Attorney General for an undertaking that any evidence given by a selection of corporate witnesses would not be used to pursue criminal charges against them.

Masoud continued: ‘They should be made to give evidence and if that evidence leads to a criminal prosecution then there must be no immunity.

‘As firefighters were called to the inquiry, we gave evidence without question.

‘Firefighters were scrutinised, they were questioned, they were criticised and in some case they received abuse afterwards.

‘The London Fire Brigades Commissioner Dany Cotton was forced to resign.

‘Yet somehow these people, who were actually responsible for the refurbishment are to be treated with kid gloves.

‘We want justice for the 72 people. No one in this situation should be granted immunity, and definitely not the manufacturers of the cladding.

‘It is not good enough that the companies are demanding that they should be immune from prosecution. What does this tell you about possible culpability?’

Joe Delaney from the Grenfell Action Group said: ‘This has disgusted me. The point of the inquiry was to produce truth and justice. Now it appears that we will only get truth at the expense of justice.

‘We should shut the inquiry down until criminal proceedings are done. I don’t see any point in the inquiry now. What is the point of it?

‘What good is finding the truth if there are no repercussions for wrongdoing.

‘I think that there should have been criminal proceedings by now, there is really no excuse.

‘We were told that there were not going to be prosecutions until the inquiry was done so that we knew everything that was needed to know.

‘Moore-Bick’s phase one report said that the cladding was non-compliant … there is your criminal case there.

‘This decision has been taken for the benefit of PM Boris Johnson. He cut essential services, and guess what: When there was an emergency we needed essential services that were not there.

‘While he was Mayor he closed ten fire stations, axed 552 firefighters’ jobs, and withdrew 14 fire engines from service. The council is also to blame.

‘If that council was anything but Tory it would have been in special measures two and half years ago. It needs to be put in special measures, gut the thing and start from scratch, root and branch reform.

‘Part of justice isn’t just rehabilitation, it is about punishment and deterrents and that includes jail.’

UK: Grenfell fire inquiry finalises moves to grant corporations immunity from prosecution: here.

3 thoughts on “‘No impunity for London Grenfell disaster corporations’

  1. Pingback: London Grenfell disaster guilty corporations get impunity? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  2. Pingback: London Grenfell disaster, guilty corporations scot-free | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.