Iowa, USA caucus chaos, establishment sabotages Sanders


This 4 February 2920 video from the USA is called Mike Waits for the Iowa Caucus Results…

How democratic is what happens now in the USA, which used to be called ‘the great arsenal of democracy‘?

By Patrick Martin in the USA:

With Sanders headed to victory, Iowa Democratic Party blocks release of caucus results

4 February 2020

The Iowa Democratic Party has refused to release results of the caucuses held throughout the state on Monday night to determine the allocation of delegates for the party’s presidential nomination. Officials are now saying that they hope to have results “some time Tuesday.”

The action is an unprecedented intervention by the party apparatus into the process of choosing the party’s presidential nominee. It is clearly directed at the campaign of Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, who was leading in the polls and was expected to place first in a four- or five-way contest in Iowa.

The media and non-Sanders Democratic Party candidates quickly developed a common line, citing supposed “quality control” issues in the vote that questioned its “legitimacy.” The New York Times, which earlier posted polling results that clearly showed Sanders in the lead, removed all such figures from its front page by midnight.

An official statement from the Iowa Democratic Party claimed that there were “inconsistencies in the reporting of three sets of results” from each of the more than 1,700 precinct caucuses held across the state. The party statement did not explain the nature of the discrepancies or how they were to be remedied, except to claim that the issue was not the result of a hack or other external interference with the tabulation of the vote.

Lawyers for the campaign of former Vice President Joe Biden sent a letter to the Iowa Democratic Party Monday night demanding an accounting of the method being used for “quality control” in the vote tabulation before any results are released. This could keep the results of the caucus voting secret for days, if not weeks, while courtroom battles are played out, in a manner reminiscent of the 2000 vote in Florida.

Precincts covered by the major media Monday night reported that Biden suffered a debacle, often not even receiving enough support to pass into the second round of voting.

The manipulation of the results in Iowa is clearly directed from the top. The Democratic National Committee sent dozens of top operatives, including software and cybersecurity experts, into Iowa in the weeks before the caucuses. Even before Monday, there were efforts to develop the line that the vote might not be legitimate.

In fact, the software application used to report the results from precinct caucuses—three sets of numbers for less than a dozen candidates—would not have been very complex, and there was ample time for testing and security measures.

The weeks leading up to the Iowa caucuses featured a coordinated campaign by the corporate media and the Democratic Party establishment to undermine Sanders’ support. This campaign was widely viewed as unsuccessful or even counterproductive—boosting support for the self-described “democratic socialist” rather than reducing it.

The failure to report results from the caucus raises new questions about Saturday’s decision to cancel the release of the final Iowa Poll by the Des Moines Register, allegedly because of a complaint by the Buttigieg campaign that at least one telephone survey worker did not include the name of their candidate. The poll was expected to confirm Sanders’ standing as the leading candidate, only two days before the caucuses.

All the major Democratic candidates made speeches Monday night thanking their supporters and pledging to continue their campaigns in the New Hampshire primary February 11. Significantly, however, Buttigieg was the only one to claim he had been “victorious” in the caucuses, an assertion that had no basis in any figures reported from the state, since there were none.

Data from entrance polls reported on cable television suggested that Sanders was in the lead with at least 23 percent, followed by Buttigieg, Warren and Biden, in fourth place with about 16 percent. Demographic information on caucus-goers also suggested such an order of finish, with the proportion of voters under 30 jumping from 18 percent in 2016, when Sanders and Hillary Clinton finished in a virtual tie, to 24 percent in 2020.

The proportion of voters over 65 years of age—the base of the Biden campaign—fell from 34 percent in 2016 to only 28 percent in 2020.

The debacle and orchestrated operation over the Iowa caucuses is only a foretaste of what is to come in the efforts by the Democratic Party to rig the primary election process.

This 4 February 2020 video from the USA says about itself:

DNC Vote Count DISASTER After Iowa Caucuses

The Iowa Caucus results were delayed because of an app the DNC used to tally the results. Ana Kasparian, Cenk Uygur, and Ben Mankiewicz discuss on The Young Turks special coverage of the 2020 Iowa Caucuses. Tell us what you think in the comments below.

This 4 February 2020 video from the USA is called Sure Sign Bernie Won Iowa Caucus.

FORMER US Secretary of State John Kerry has denied plans to enter the presidential race to “stop Bernie Sanders taking down the Democratic Party” ahead of today’s Iowa caucus. Mr Kerry was overheard by an NBC journalist speaking on the phone on Sunday explaining that he would need to step down from the board of the Bank of America and “raise a couple of million” for his campaign: here.

THESE CAMPAIGNS RAISED THOUSANDS FROM LOBBYISTS Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), former Vice President Joe Biden and former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg all raised thousands of dollars from registered federal lobbyists, according to new campaign finance disclosures the candidates were required to file. Donors included lobbyists who have represented the fossil fuel industry, for-profit college companies and major pharmaceutical makers. [HuffPost]

11 thoughts on “Iowa, USA caucus chaos, establishment sabotages Sanders

  1. Democratic presidential candidate Deval Patrick took a shot at his fellow candidates, in the face of uncertainty over the results of the Iowa caucuses.

    “One candidate is calling the results into question because he apparently didn’t do well. Another is declaring victory without any votes being confirmed. The way to beat Donald Trump isn’t to act like Donald Trump. Our party and our country deserve better,” he said in a statement.

    While the outcome of the Iowa Democratic caucuses still remains unknown, former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg declared victory before the results were released.

    https://edition.cnn.com/politics/live-news/iowa-caucuses-live-results-coverage-2020/index.html

    Like

  2. The Buttigieg campaign has used the same company that developed the app in Iowa

    Pete Buttigieg’s campaign said they have used Shadow Inc. — the same app company that developed the app in Iowa that caused the reporting error.

    A Buttigieg campaign aide said they “have contracted with this vendor in the past for text messaging services to help us contact voters. Totally unrelated to any apps they built for the party.”

    It appears that Joe Biden and Kirsten Gillibrand’s campaign have also used the company, as well as other state Democratic parties.

    https://edition.cnn.com/politics/live-news/iowa-caucuses-live-results-coverage-2020/index.html

    Like

  3. Pingback: Hillary Clinton attacks Sanders, rap music parody | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: Sanders victory, Buttigieg pseudo-victory, ‘frontrunner’ Biden fourth | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: Iowa Democratic establishment recounts, to stop Sanders | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: Sanders wins in Iowa, Democratic establishment sabotages | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: Iowa, USA caucus voting chaos, musical parody | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.