Stuffed museum birds help living Darwin finches


This 2014 video says about itself:

The Galápagos finches remain one of our world’s greatest examples of adaptive radiation. Watch as evolutionary biologists Rosemary and Peter Grant detail their 40-year project to painstakingly document the evolution of these famous finches. Their pioneering studies have revealed clues as to how 13 distinct finch species arose from a single ancestral population that migrated to the islands 2 million to 3 million years ago.

From the University of Cincinnati in the USA:

Museums put ancient DNA to work for wildlife

Old museum specimens are giving researchers fresh insights into endangered species

October 17, 2019

Summary: Scientists who are trying to save species at the brink of extinction are finding help in an unexpected place. Researchers increasingly are embracing the power of ancient DNA from old museum specimens to answer questions about climate change, habitat loss and other stresses on surviving populations.

Scientists who are trying to save species at the brink of extinction are finding help in an unexpected place.

Heather Farrington, curator of zoology for the Cincinnati Museum Center, is using DNA from specimens collected more than 100 years ago to help understand the evolution and stresses faced by today’s animals.

Farrington runs the museum’s new state-of-the-art genetics laboratory, which helps researchers study populations of animals over time.

Researchers increasingly are embracing the power of ancient DNA from old museum specimens to answer questions about climate change, habitat loss and other stresses on surviving populations. Ancient DNA has been used to explain the diversity of livestock in Africa and the first domestication of wild horses in Asia.

Farrington earned her doctorate in biological sciences from the University of Cincinnati, where she charted the family trees of Galapagos finches and used the latest DNA tools to gain fresh insights about the birds from century-old museum specimens.

The museum’s genetics lab works with researchers and government agencies on a variety of projects that require DNA analysis, from conserving wildlife to improving our understanding of the natural world.

Recently, the lab helped with a conservation project on the Allegheny woodrat, a small rock-loving rodent that is in decline across much of its historic range from Indiana to New Jersey. In Ohio it’s found in only one place, the Richard and Lucille Durrell Edge of Appalachia Preserve, a mix of mature forest and limestone cliffs along the Ohio River.

The museum’s lab analysis found that Ohio’s woodrats are maintaining their genetic diversity so far despite their geographic isolation.

The lab also has studied the genetics of Ohio’s crayfish and a beautiful yellow-and-black songbird called a hooded warbler.

The museum’s DNA lab has glass walls on two sides so the public can watch scientists at work. Next door, visitors also can watch museum staff and volunteers prepare fossils from a public gallery at the paleontology lab.

Farrington’s colleague, museum collections manager Emily Imhoff, explained how the sensitive equipment works.

The lab keeps DNA samples in refrigerators, including one set to a chilly minus-112 degrees Fahrenheit. Scientists can identify the concentration of DNA, amplify the sample and sequence it to understand the lineage and relationships of species.

“We definitely feel our work is useful when we take on projects with other researchers,” Imhoff said. “Heather and I are both passionate about our work.”

Farrington was looking for a graduate program in aquatic ecology that could satisfy her growing curiosity about genetics. UC biology professor Kenneth Petren, who served as dean of UC’s McMicken College of Arts and Sciences, reached out to recruit her to UC.

“He said, ‘Well, I do genetics, but I don’t do fish. I work on Darwin’s finches,'” Farrington said.

At UC, Petren has conducted two decades of research on descendants of birds that shaped Charles Darwin‘s understanding of evolution through natural selection in the Galapagos Islands of Ecuador.

“I thought, ‘Oh, my gosh, I can’t say no to Darwin’s finches,'” Farrington said.

Farrington, Petren and UC biology professor Lucinda Lawson authored a study of finch populations that was published recently in the journal Conservation Genetics. Moreover, at UC Farrington also realized what a valuable resource museum collections are for genetic research. For her dissertation, she examined museum specimens gathered more than 100 years ago to understand how Galapagos finch populations have changed over time.

Farrington developed many of the important lab techniques she uses at the museum while conducting research at UC, Petren said.

“While at UC, Heather worked very hard to pioneer the use of museum specimens for population genetics analysis,” Petren said. “Our lab was a leader in this field because of Heather’s efforts.

“She used the techniques she developed to address issues of conservation in several different species of Galapagos finches,” Petren said. “She went on to become a leader in the field of environmental DNA in her role working for the U.S. Department of Defense, which was interested in monitoring rare species or to provide early warnings of problematic invasive species like the Asian carp.”

Farrington said her experience while researching museum specimens for her dissertation at UC convinced her of how valuable these resources can be for future study. “That is really what got me into museum work and the amazing things you can learn from museum specimens,” Farrington said.

On some of the Galapagos Islands where human-introduced predators of Darwin’s finches were eradicated over a decade ago, the finches are still acting as though they are in danger, according to research published today in the Journal of Animal Ecology. The study found that the finches’ fearful responses — known as antipredator behaviour — were sustained through multiple generations after the threat was gone, which could have detrimental consequences for their survival: here.

2 thoughts on “Stuffed museum birds help living Darwin finches

  1. I feel that Darwin was wrong to sacrifice living birds.This is one of the basic things that is wrong with science. We, as human beings, in our arrogance, sacrifice living animals and birds, in order to satisfy our desire to know and scientific curiosity. It doesn’t matter what “good” things might come from this “knowledge.” Ultimately, it is disrespectful of life and of the right to live of other beings – and nothing good can come of it. It increases our alienation from nature, which is what is wrong with how we relate to the planet, and why we are in the process of destroying all life. Originally, science respected nature, and derived knowledge solely from observation, not from killing animals and birds. Ancient people were respectful towards nature – they did hunt and fish, and (though I’m opposed to doing that today) I do acknowledge that we need to take some things from nature in order to survive, just like every other life form does. But the modern human mind, with its overabundance of curiosity, and its propensity for killing every living thing because “we are superior” is, sadly, lacking in respect and appreciation for other beautiful living creatures. Every bird has an intrinsic beauty, worth, and the right to live its own life in peace.

    Like

  2. Pingback: Darwin’s finches evolution, new research | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.