This 13 August 2019 video from the USA is called Kamala’s Campaign Praises Hillary [Clinton]’s War Mongering.
So, it looks like Democratic party presidential candidate Kamala Harris is not only tough on persecuting poor people and weak on prosecuting billionaires like Steven Mnuchin, now Trump’s Secretary of the Treasury; and weak on prosecuting sexually abusive Roman Catholic clergymen. She is weak on peace as well.
Dear Kitty. Some blog 
I’m not interested in knowing what Jimmy Dore, who promoted the Seth Rich conspiracy, has to say about anything.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So, if you disagree with someone or some medium on subject A, that makes automatically that person’s or medium’s reports on subjects B, C, D, E … till Z, completely uninteresting about anything?
The Washington Post in the USA is now the mouthpiece of Jeff Bezos: warmonger, world’s richest man and world’s worst exploiter, causing massively injuries and deaths among his Amazon.com empire’s workers. Bezos until recently used to be chummy with the murderous crown prince of Saudi Arabia. But then, the Saudi crown prince extended his mass murder beyond Yemeni civilians, unknown Saudi human rights activists, unknown Saudi journalists, etc. His Royal Highness had Jamal Khashoggi, a Washington Post employee, hacked to pieces with a bone saw. Then, and not earlier, the crown prince went too far for the Washington Post. Then they had some writings and videos on the Khashoggi murder. I embedded and quoted some of these on my blog. As I thought they were interesting enough. Should I boycott the Washington Post totally?
LikeLiked by 1 person
My comment was limited to objecting to the analysis of a man who has promoted a conspiracy. Once someone has promoted a conspiracy, yes, I am no longer interested in what they have to say about any other subject as I no longer trust their ability to distinguish fact from fiction.
LikeLike
How then about these conspiracy theories?
The George W Bush administration, right-wing Democratic politicians like Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden, and the corporate media including the ‘liberal’ New York Times, all supported two conspiracy theories for starting the Iraq war:
1. There was supposedly a conspiracy between Saddam Husein and Osama bin Laden (who really hated each other) to together commit the 9/11 attacks.
2. Iraq supposedly had weapons of mass destruction, and had conspired to get them with Niger.
All lies.
The conspiracy theory which recently was most promoted in much of the US corporate media, is the ‘Russiagate’ conspiracy theory. Debunked by Noam Chomsky and many others:
https://dearkitty1.wordpress.com/2019/03/26/noam-chomsky-on-united-states-russiagate-conspiracy-theory/
That theory claims that Hillary Clinton lost, and Trump won, the US presidency because Trump is supposedly a tool of Russia.
In reality, Trump won, because of:
1. The eighteenth-century electoral college system.
2. Because Republican politicians had disenfranchised millions of, eg, African American voters:
https://dearkitty1.wordpress.com/2016/12/17/voting-rights-violations-not-russian-hacking-real-us-election-scandal/
3. Because Hillary Clinton was not an attractive alternative to Trump. Because of her Wall Street links and warmongering. She herself admitted: I lost, because I am a capitalist:
https://dearkitty1.wordpress.com/2018/05/08/i-lost-election-being-a-capitalist-hillary-clinton-admits/
While, according to many polls, Bernie Sanders would have defeated Trump.
Trump does not represent Russia. He represents roughly half of the United States billionaire class. Blaming some Russian or other Johnny Foreigner is a lazy alternative to criticizing capitalism in the USA; and to criticizing the real crimes of Trump, like climate denial, environmental destruction for Big Oil, racism, concentration camps for immigrating, misogyny, homophobia etc. etc.
Some corollaries of the Russiagate conspiracy theory:
– smearing Bernie Sanders as a ‘tool of Russia’
https://dearkitty1.wordpress.com/2018/02/25/united-states-corporate-media-anti-bernie-sanders-russian-spy-smears/
– smearing ex-Democratic party chair Donna Brazile as a ‘tool of Russia’
https://dearkitty1.wordpress.com/2017/11/06/united-states-clintonites-red-bait-donna-brazile-as-russias-tool/
– smearing Green party presidential candidate Jill Stein as a ‘tool of Russia’
https://dearkitty1.wordpress.com/2017/12/23/american-green-party-witch-hunted-in-russia-hysteria/
– smearing the Black Lives Matter movement as ‘tools of Russia’
https://dearkitty1.wordpress.com/2018/03/22/black-lives-matter-smeared-as-tools-of-russia/
– smearing this African American woman as a ‘tool of Russia’
https://dearkitty1.wordpress.com/2018/04/24/united-states-anti-racist-black-woman-smeared-as-russian-tool/
So, that would, according to you, mean that I should always disregard what the corporate media, the Republicans and the Democratic right-wingers say. I won’t do that. As, very occasionally, they may say things which may be true; or, even if not 100% true, at least interesting.
LikeLike
Pingback: ‘Russiagate’ conspiracy theory in the USA | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Corporate Democrat Kamala Harris stops presidential campaign | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Wall Street presidential candidate Harris, buh bye! | Dear Kitty. Some blog