Saudi arms sales illegal, British court decides


Andrew Smith, spokesperson for Campaign Against Arms Trade in Britain, speaks to the media outside the Royal Courts of Justice, London, after they won a landmark legal challenge at the Court of Appeal over the Government's decision to continue to allow arms sales to Saudi Arabia

By Ceren Sagir in Britain:

Thursday, June 20, 2019

The government broke the law over its arms sales to the Saudis, court rules

Campaign Against the Arms Trade, represented by solicitors Leigh Day, brought legal action against International Trade Secretary Liam Fox

VICTORY was declared by anti-arms trade campaigners today as a British court ruled that the government broke the law over its sale of weapons to Saudi Arabia.

The Court of Appeal in London decided to overturn a 2017 high court judgement that allowed the government to continue licensing the export of arms to Saudi Arabia that may be used against Yemen.

After today’s judgement the government announced that it has stopped approving the sale of weapons that could be used in Yemen.

International Trade Secretary Liam Fox said the government would challenge the ruling but suspended new export licences for Saudi Arabia and its coalition partners amid an internal review.

Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT), represented by solicitors Leigh Day, brought legal action against Mr Fox in April.

CAAT spokesman Andrew Smith welcomed the verdict but said it “should never have taken a court case brought by campaigners to force the government to follow its own rules.

The Saudi Arabian regime is one of the most brutal and repressive in the world, yet, for decades, it has been the largest buyer of UK-made arms.

“No matter what atrocities it has inflicted, the Saudi regime has been able to count on the uncritical political and military support of the UK.

The bombing has created the worst humanitarian crisis in the world. UK arms companies have profited every step of the way.”

Mr Smith said that the war could not have been possible without British arms sales, despite public opposition, and said campaigners hope the decision sends a message to other governments that they “can’t get away with this.”

The legal action was based on reports that Saudi forces had violated international humanitarian law (IHL) in their ongoing assault on Yemen.

The law states that export licences should not be granted if there is a clear risk the equipment might be used in a serious violation of IHL.

While announcing the court’s decision, Master of the Rolls Sir Terence Etherton said the government “made no concluded assessments of whether the Saudi-led coalition had committed violations of international humanitarian law in the past, during the Yemen conflict, and made no attempt to do so.”

Leigh Day solicitor Rosa Curling said the “horrors” witnessed in Yemen can no longer be ignored by the British government.

Labour MP Lloyd Russell-Moyle, who sits on the House of Commons committee on arms export controls, spoke outside the court to demand a public inquiry into the sales of arms to the Saudi regime.

Labour’s shadow foreign secretary Emily Thornberry said: “This devastating judgement proves everything Labour has been saying for years: that ministers have wilfully disregarded the evidence that Saudi Arabia was violating international humanitarian law in Yemen while nevertheless continuing to supply them with weapons.

“What we now need is a full parliamentary or public inquiry to find out how that was allowed to happen and which ministers were responsible for those breaches of the law.

“This also shows beyond doubt why we need the root-and-branch reform of our arms export rules that Labour has promised, so these decisions are never again made by ministers in such a careless, reckless and arbitrary way.”

War Child’s Rocco Blume said: “This landmark ruling shows the UK government has failed Yemen’s children.

“As the UK continues to seek to make a name for itself on the international stage post-Brexit, now is the time to stand up for the very rules and guidelines that we claim to uphold.”

A Downing Street spokeswoman said the government was “disappointed” with the judgement and was seeking permission to appeal.

17 thoughts on “Saudi arms sales illegal, British court decides

  1. Pingback: Saudi arms sales illegal, British court decides — Dear Kitty. Some blog – Introverted but Socially Concerned

  2. Pingback: Italian workers stop Saudi weapons import again | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: Saudi arms sales illegal, British court decides | sdbast

  4. Pingback: Saudi regime butchers Yemen with British weapons | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: US, UAE support for Saudi-Yemen war stopping? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: Saudi dictatorship murders Khashoggi, gets British weapons | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: United States teenagers against Yemen war | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: Stop London arms fair, 2-7 September | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: United Nations condemn Saudi crimes in Yemen | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: War profiteers accused of war crimes | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: British Conservatives break Saudi arms sales rules | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: Saudi-US-UK-French war crimes in Yemen, Amnesty says | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: Stop British arms trade for Saudi-Yemen war | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  14. Pingback: British bombs still killing Yemenis | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  15. Pingback: BAE Saudi massacre of Yemenis profiteering continues | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.