British corporation extorts residents for removing ‘Grenfell’ cladding


Lucy Ireland

By Phil Miller in England:

Sunday, January 6, 2019

Manchester residents hit with cladding bill

RESIDENTS at a block of flats in Manchester are facing bills of tens of thousands of pounds to replace cladding, the Morning Star understands.

Leaseholder Lucy Ireland, 28, says she is living in fear about the fire safety of her housing block after authorities told her it was unsafe.

Concerns over cladding emerged across the country in the wake of the Grenfell Tower disaster, in which 72 people died.

At least two blocks of flats in Manchester have already landed their leaseholders with £10,000 bills to replace cladding, after a tribunal ruled that the freeholder was not liable.

Now another site in Manchester, owned by property management firm UrbanBubble, is passing the costs on to its residents at a nine-storey location.

Ms Ireland believes her bill could be up to £25,000, which she cannot afford to pay. She runs a small sweet shop and struggles to pay herself the minimum wage.

She is now launching a campaign to challenge the cladding costs.

After opening a twitter account, @LucyMIreland, to publicise her concerns, she “received wonderful advice and support from other [housing] campaigners.”

She told the Star that her next move is to arrange a residents’ meeting. “I’m reaching out to everybody and trying to arrange a meeting with other campaigners who can explain the gravity of the situation.”

“I am particularly worried about people’s mental and emotional health at this time of year with all of the other pressures.

“It’s a terrifying prospect for someone like me, a local business owner who sometimes doesn’t make minimum wage to have to raise that kind of money. I can’t – and I dread to think how that will impact people who have dependants.”

Ms Ireland believes that if the residents campaign together then they will be able to resist the cladding charges.

Housing Minister James Brokenshire MP has said that building owners and developers must replace the most dangerous types of cladding and that “the costs must not be passed on to leaseholders.”

“My message is clear,” Mr Brokenshire said, “private building owners must pay for this work now or they should expect to pay more later.”

Mr Brokenshire’s theory sounds good for a Conservative. However, how about practice?

UrbanBubble was not available to comment. In its latest set of annual accounts, the company said its priorities included “be amazing” and “delight your customer”.

6 thoughts on “British corporation extorts residents for removing ‘Grenfell’ cladding

  1. Pingback: Cladding scandal corporation gets Manchester, England contract | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  2. Pingback: ´Name British Grenfell inflammable cladding landlords ´ | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: London Grenfell Tower cladding disaster, new study | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: Coronavirus endangers British homeless, flammable cladding residents | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply to sdbast Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.