Impunity for British sexually abusive spying police?

London protest against police spying

By Sam Tobin in Britain:

Thursday, March 22, 2018

Spycops‘ victims walk out of ‘illegitimate’ Mitting inquiry

Core participants refuse to serve as ‘window dressing’ for broken probe

THE CREDIBILITY of the spycops inquiry lay in tatters today after a mass walkout by core participants who refused to lend the inquiry “a legitimacy it does not have and does not deserve.”

Growing frustration with inquiry chair John Mitting, who has granted full anonymity to the vast majority of undercover officers, came to a head when the core participants and their supporters left the hearing in protest at being treated as “mere window dressing.”

The inquiry into the Metropolitan Police’s Special Demonstration Squad (SDS), which infiltrated political groups — with undercover officers often engaging in long-term sexual relationships and committing crimes to maintain their cover — has been bogged down in anonymity applications since it was established three years ago.

Phillippa Kaufmann QC said the core participants “have reached a point where our concerns can no longer be ignored.”

Addressing Mr Mitting, she said the focus of the victims’ “very grave concerns are disclosure and, to be frank, yourself.”

She described the inquiry chair as “the usual white upper-middle-class elderly gentleman whose life experiences are a million miles away from those who were spied upon.”

Ms Kaufmann asked Mr Mitting to either stand down or at least sit with a panel of people “who will understand the critical issues that shape this inquiry.”

She concluded: “We are not prepared actively to participate in a process where [the core participants’] presence is mere window dressing, lacking all substance and meaning, which would achieve nothing other than lending this process a legitimacy it does not have and does not deserve.”

As the public gallery emptied en masse, one core participant told Mr Mitting: “You want to cover up the identity of my former abuser. You want to give him the privacy I never had.”

Doreen Lawrence, who was spied on as she campaigned for justice for her murdered son Stephen, said she was “saddened” by the walkout, but it was a step “I have been forced to take.”

She said Mr Mitting was “turning what should be a transparent, accountable and public hearing into an inquiry cloaked in secrecy and anonymity”, adding: “I want to know the names of the police officers who spied on me, my family and our campaign for justice.”

HN109, the officer in charge of the SDS the night Stephen Lawrence was murdered, was effectively granted anonymity today.

“Andrea”, who was once engaged to notorious spycop “Carlo Neri”, said: “What we need is a group who can investigate institutional sexism with some life experience and background in it.”

She pointed to the SDS “tradecraft manual” — written by current Tory councillor Andy Coles and published this week — noting that it “shows that sexual relationships were actually part of the trade … it was strategic, it wasn’t rogue officers.”

Blacklisted worker Dave Smith said the inquiry had “descended into a good old-fashioned Establishment cover-up,” adding: “Mitting was put in charge to carry out a job of work on us and he’s doing it.

“Mitting must go and needs to be replaced with a panel of experts who have at least some degree of empathy with the victims and are prepared to question the accounts of undercover police officers who have been trained to lie.”

Hannah Sell from Youth Against Racism in Europe said the walkout was the result of “an accumulation of the fact that there is no attempt to cross-question the police”, adding that she hoped the walkout “puts pressure not just on Mitting but on the whole process.

“This inquiry wasn’t set up because [then home secretary] Theresa May had a change of heart. It was public pressure that forced them to it and us walking out will exert public pressure not just on Mitting but the government.”

CALLS for a public inquiry into construction industry blacklisting reached fever pitch yesterday after the Met finally admitted it had passed information to key blacklisting organisations: here.

IPCC admits Special Branch acted illegally to assist drawing up ‘blacklist’ for bosses: here.

GMB, the union for construction workers, has described the Metropolitan Police’s admission of their role in the blacklisting scandal as a constitutional crisis which needs a public inquiry. Scotland Yard today admitted Special Branch officers passed information to a controversial network that blacklisted construction workers: here.

Undercover Policing Inquiry: Spycop who infiltrated the Stephen Lawrence campaign named: here.’

A WOMAN deceived into a sexual relationship with an undercover police officer brought legal proceedings against the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) today for not bringing criminal charges against him: here.

Mitting Inquiry: Spycop booted out the Met for gross misconduct over his relationship with female activist: here.

Spycops inquiry completion delayed by five years: here.

Mother of murdered Ricky Reel to meet spycops judge over police surveillance of her family: here.

SPYCOPS inquiry chair Sir John Mitting finally agreed to meet the victims of undercover police surveillance today. Both Mr Mitting and his predecessor Sir Christopher Pitchford had previously turned down invitations to meet with core participants: here.

11 thoughts on “Impunity for British sexually abusive spying police?

  1. Pingback: “Impunity for British sexually abusive spying police?” | Dear Kitty | COMRADE BOYCIE: VIVA THE ANTI-tORY / BIG BROTHER REVOLUTION!

  2. Pingback: London Grenfell disaster information cover-up | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Wednesday, April 11, 2018

    Probe names undercover cops Stewart and Peter

    THE COVER names of two more former undercover police officers were released by the spycops inquiry yesterday.

    The inquiry named “Stewart Goodman” as having infiltrated the Anti-Apartheid Movement and the International Socialists, later renamed the Socialist Workers Party, in 1970 and 1971.

    However, campaigners said that he had previously been listed on the inquiry’s website as HN339, active between 1970 and 1974.

    The inquiry also revealed the cover name of “Peter Fredericks,” who had infiltrated the black power movement, Operation Omega and Young Haganah in 1971.

    The inquiry announced that, “subject to final checks,” it planned to publish five further cover names next Monday.

    The spycops inquiry’s credibility was severely damaged last month when core participants staged a mass walkout to show their frustration with chair John Mitting, accusing him of erecting a “brick wall of silence” by granting full anonymity to the vast majority of undercover officers.

    It is next due to sit on May 9 to consider further anonymity applications by former spycops.


  4. Pingback: Heineken beer, corruption, abuse, genocide in Africa | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: British police spying on animal welfare, leftist groups | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: British police abuse women, spy on trade unionists | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: More government Internet censorship in Britain | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: British sexually abusive police spies and Lush cosmetics campaign | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: British police spying on the left | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: Police sexual spying on British women | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.