London residents’ huge bill for corporate flammable cladding

This video from England says about itself:

‘Terrified’ residents hit with £2MILLION bill to replace cladding after Grenfell Tower

17 January 2018

People living in the Citiscape building in Croydon, south London, say they are “terrified” after receiving the sky-high demand for payment. Cladding at the building failed tests in the wake of the Grenfell tragedy five months ago.

But leaseholders have been told by site owner Proxima GR Properties that it is not liable for the costs. Instead, residents have been told to foot the bill, warned work will not start until they do and threatened that the costs for things like fire wardens and scaffolding could shoot up if there is any delay.

From daily The Independent in Britain today:

Grenfell Tower: Residents of private block of flats handed £2m bill to replace ‘flammable’ cladding

Leaseholders of the 93 flats estimate total charges could be in excess of £31,300 per household, payable as early as March 2018

Lucy Pasha-Robinson

“Terrified” residents of a high-rise tower block fitted with the same cladding as Grenfell Tower are being asked to pay millions to carry out urgent fire safety work.

Leaseholders of the Citiscape block in Croydon, South London, have been handed a combined £2m bill to replace the aluminium composite material (ACM) panels, the same type as those believed to have aided the spread of the blaze in north Kensington in June.

The privately-owned tower was one of 228 buildings to fail combustibility tests in the wake of that, which claimed 71 lives.

But the building’s owner said it was not its responsibility to pay, despite instructions from the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) that the cladding should be replaced due to its “high combustibility” risk.

Management company FirstPort asked leaseholders to fund the new panels, and find a further £300,000 a year to fund a full-time fire marshall.

FirstPort have claimed the costs are “maintenance to be claimed under service charge”.

Residents of the 93 flats estimate the total charges could be in excess of £31,300 per household, which could be payable as early as March 2018. Work on the building will only begin “once full funds are in place”, according to FirstPort.

One resident, who asked not to be named, told The Independent leaseholders are “really scared” and “don’t know what to do”.

“Of course we couldn’t afford that. These flats are worth anything between £200,000 and £300,000, no more. Who can afford this? Show me one person who can afford this”, they said.

“It could be £50,000 each, it would cost more than what people put down as deposit and stamp duty in the first place.

“This has really shocked us. We are being taken to a tribunal in February where the freeholder will be represented by lawyers – we don’t have lawyers, we cant afford lawyers.

“We are the normal public, working away, paying our taxes and nobody cares.”

Residents said they felt “abandoned” and “betrayed” by government after DCLG urged private landlords to absorb costs for cladding replacement works, but stopped short of introducing any law that requires them to do so.

Richard (surname withheld) said his 95-year-old father had barely enough money to cover his winter bills.

“My father who has resided at Citiscape since 2004, is now 95 years of age…. it is unreasonable to make such a demand from a pensioner receiving only the state pension being barely sufficient to cover the winter bills and his daily upkeep”, he said.

Alex Blanc, 37, who owns a two-bedroom flat in the tower, said: “This situation has become out of control. I’m very worried about the prospect of losing my flat. I have contacted Estate Agents to try and sell it but they told me this flat will never sell under those circumstances. My equity has also become negative since this debacle.”

The leaseholders will be taken to a tribunal by FirstPort on 9 February, where a decision will be made over who is obliged to pay for the works. The ruling is likely to set a precedent for the more than 200 other private buildings that identified fire risks in the wake of the Grenfell blaze.

RESIDENTS facing a £2 million bill to have Grenfell-type cladding removed from their building have launched a petition demanding government intervention: here.

Croydon residents still facing huge bill to remove death-trap cladding. A 95-year-old man facing a huge bill to remove Grenfell-style cladding removed from his home has been hospitalised with stress, a tribunal heard today: here.

14 thoughts on “London residents’ huge bill for corporate flammable cladding

  1. Pingback: “London residents’ huge bill for corporate flammable cladding” | Dear Kitty | COMRADE BOYCIE: VIVA THE ANTI-TORY/BIG BROTHER REVOLUTION!

  2. Pingback: British ‘Grenfell’ flammable cladding replaced at just three tower blocks | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Reblogged this on Wirral In It Together and commented:
    It’s true to form and what we expected. In the same week that Theresa May promised to get tough on the directors of corporations… she needs to step in now and not allow those directors whose industry is partly responsible for an alleged 80 foreseeable and avoidable deaths to be bailed out… and innocent council residents to be hit with the bill.


  4. Beyond extortion rip off UK. Ruthless, unaccountable, unregulated Corporate greed was, and is the policy of successive governments, and now we are hijacked and at their mercy .

    With no rights against them or the state.

    But all we have to do, as Orwell said, is to rise up and shake the flies off our back.


  5. Pingback: ‘Grenfell’ flammable cladding all over Britain | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: London landlords extort residents about flammable cladding | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: British Conservative OK for flammable cladding | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: London Conservative politicians blamed for flammable Grenfell Tower cladding | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: British Grenfell disaster and Conservative government | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: ‘Grenfell’ flammable cladding in Australia | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: Remove ‘Grenfell’ flammable cladding in Britain now | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: British corporation extorts residents for removing ‘Grenfell’ cladding | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: Cladding scandal corporation gets Manchester, England contract | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.