Inequality getting worse, economists say


Top 1 percent vs. bottom 50 percent national income shares in the USA 1980–2016

By Niles Niemuth in the USA:

World’s richest one percent capture twice as much income growth as the bottom half

15 December 2017

The inaugural World Inequality Report published on Thursday by economists Thomas Piketty, Emmanuel Saez, Gabriel Zucman, Facundo Alvaredo and Lucas Chancel documents the rise in global income and wealth inequality since 1980.

The report covers up to 2016, leaving out the last year, in which the stock market has soared on the expectation that the US will enact massive tax cuts, providing yet another windfall for the rich.

The report found that between 1980 and 2016 the world’s richest one percent captured twice the income growth as the bottom half of the world’s population, contributing to a significant rise in global inequality.

The data shows that world’s top 0.1 percent alone captured as much growth as the bottom half, and the top 0.001 percent, just 76,000 people worldwide, received 4 percent of global income growth. Meanwhile those in 50th to 99th percentiles worldwide, which the report refers to as the “squeezed bottom 90 percent in the US and Western Europe”, encompassing the working class in the world’s advanced economies, experienced anemic growth rates.

The report is based on tax data and other financial information collected for the World Wealth and Income Database by more than 100 researchers in 70 countries. It shows that income inequality has either risen or remained stable in every country.

Additionally, the report found that concentration of wealth in the hands of the top one percent has risen sharply, particularly in the US, Russia and China. In the US, the wealth share monopolized by the top one percent rose from 22 percent in 1980 to 39 percent; in China it doubled from 15 percent to 30 percent; and in Russia it went from 22 percent to 43 percent.

In terms of income, the top ten percent captured 37 percent of national income in Europe, 41 percent in China, 47 percent in the United States-Canada, 54 percent in Sub-Saharan Africa, 55 percent in Brazil and India, and 61 percent in the Middle East.

Top 1 percent wealth shares across the world, 1913–2015

Notably Russia, when it was still part of the Soviet Union, had the lowest level of inequality in 1980, with the top ten percent accounting for 20 percent of income. There was a sharp spike in inequality following the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1990-91, with half of all national income going to the top ten percent in less than five years. Russia has now reached parity with the United States, returning to levels of inequality which prevailed a century ago under the rule of the tsar.

The report also shows that there has been a significant divergence in inequality levels between the United States and Europe since 1980, when the top one percent claimed 10 percent of income in both regions. As of 2016, the top one percent in Europe claimed 12 percent of income, while in the United States its share had doubled to 20 percent.

The top one percent and the bottom half of the American population have essentially flipped positions. While the bottom 50 percent received 20 percent of national income in 1980, that figure declined steadily to just 13 percent by 2016. Conversely, the one percent steadily increased their claim on national income, from 10 percent to 20 percent in less than two generations.

Average annual income for the bottom half of the US population, adjusted for inflation, has remained at $16,500 for the last forty years, while the top one percent has seen its average income triple from $430,000 to $1.3 million.

Top 10 percent income shares across the world, 1980–2016

The report’s authors note in an op-ed published in the Guardian that the United States is an outlier among the advanced economies, with a surge in income and wealth inequality over the last four decades which has developed into a “second Gilded Age.”

The authors attribute the dramatic difference between the US and Europe to a “perfect storm of radical policy changes” in the US. They argue that the growth of inequality in the US has been exacerbated by a number of factors, including a tax system that has become less progressive over time, a federal minimum wage that has not kept up with inflation, shrinking unions, deregulation of the finance industry and increasingly unequal access to higher education. They warn that the Republican tax cuts will “turbocharge” the further rise of inequality.

Despite its explosive content, the latest report on inequality was buried by the media, relegated to a small headline in the Business Day section of the New York Times and posted well down the Guardian’s front page in the world news section. The vast and ever-growing levels of social inequality around the world is not what the ruling classes in the US, Europe and elsewhere want to talk about.

Social inequality in the United States is being ignored and covered up by the political system. The Democrats are entirely focused on issues of sex and the anti-Russia campaign, even as the Republicans are pushing to finalize tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy by the end of the year.

However, under the surface of official life, class conflict is growing. The World Inequality Report reveals that the contradictions of the capitalist system find expression in every country.

In concluding their report, the authors refer to policy decisions that could be adopted to reverse the growth of social inequality, promoting the illusion that a fair distribution of resources can be achieved under capitalism through various liberal reform measures and appeals to capitalist governments to enact progressive tax measures.

There is, however, no “reform” faction in the ruling class. The growth of inequality in the US has been carried out under both Democrats and Republicans … . In Europe, the ruling elite is moving rapidly to “catch up” to the United States through the implementation of labor “reform” measures, the destruction of social programs and the redistribution of wealth to the rich.

The response of the ruling class to growing social opposition is not reform, but repression. A movement against inequality requires the building of a socialist movement of the international working class, on the basis of a socialist program to appropriate the wealth of the corporate and financial oligarchy, transform the banks and giant corporations into democratically-controlled public utilities, and reorganize economic life on the basis of social need.

The UN special rapporteur on extreme poverty, Philip Alston, toured Southern California last week as part of a two-week tour to investigate the economic condition of the poorest and most vulnerable people in the US. Alston is to share preliminary remarks at the conclusion of his tour on the December 15, and is to release a final report next spring: here.

US becoming ‘world champion of extreme inequality’ under Donald Trump, says UN poverty envoy. ‘The American dream is rapidly becoming the American illusion’: here.

Last week, as Congress rushed to pass a tax bill that will transfer trillions of dollars to the financial oligarchy, two separate teams of experts published damning reports documenting the growth of social inequality in the United States: here.

Social inequality in Australia, which is already higher than in many other developed countries, worsened markedly in 2016–17, according to data presented by the charity Oxfam last week. In particular, the statistics compiled by Oxfam in its latest Australian factsheet, titled “Growing gulf between work and wealth”, show an accelerating concentration of wealth in the hands of billionaires at the expense of workers: here.

94 thoughts on “Inequality getting worse, economists say

  1. Pingback: Students strike for climate, today, tomorrow | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  2. Pingback: British anti-racist demonstrators speak | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: Big teachers’ strike in the Netherlands | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: Criminal shooting in Dutch Utrecht | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: British racists, New Zealand Islamophobic massacre copycats | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: Turkish, Australian rulers quarrel on Christchurch bloodbath | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: More European Union, Australian government internet censorship | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: Portugal’s fascist concentration camp, Lisbon exhibition | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: Paris Notre Dame cathedral fire destruction | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: Free Julian Assange, Chelsea Manning, Sri Lankans say | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: German army against German civilians? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: Young people keep fighting against climate change | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: Australian journalism on war crimes, spying: criminal? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  14. Pingback: German police attack pro-climate movement | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  15. Pingback: Right-wing austerity in Israel | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  16. Pingback: Facebook censors advertisement on war crimes whistleblowers | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  17. Pingback: Saudi regime butchers Yemen with British weapons | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  18. Pingback: Many anti-xenophobia protests | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  19. Pingback: French Macron’s war on refugees | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  20. Pingback: Bolsonaro’s Brazilian Amazon fires update | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  21. Pingback: German president in Poland silent on Holocaust | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  22. Pingback: Chilean right-wing government’s Pinochet style military repression | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  23. Pingback: Chilean workers strike as military kills | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  24. Pingback: Chilean regime kills, people don’t give up | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  25. Pingback: Millions of Chileans demonstrate for equality | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  26. Pingback: Chilean government sacked | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  27. Pingback: Donald Trump attacks Chilean anti-austerity pro-democracy demonstrators | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  28. Pingback: Chilean governmental torture, murder, disappearances | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  29. Pingback: Neo-Pinochetist repression in Chile | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  30. Pingback: Spanish neo-fascist Vox party, a danger | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  31. Pingback: Chilean right-wing government blinds people, people protest | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  32. Pingback: French Macron austerity drives students to suicide | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  33. Pingback: Stop Trump, stop NATO, 3 December, London | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  34. Pingback: Filmmaker Ken Loach on Brexit, European Union | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  35. Pingback: French army shooting striking workers? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  36. Pingback: United States wars come home as school mass shootings | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  37. Pingback: Governments censor the Internet | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  38. Pingback: Johnson’s Britain, homeless women gives birth to twins | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  39. Pingback: French workers keep fighting, interviews | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  40. Pingback: Australian bushfire disaster survivor interviewed | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  41. Pingback: Australian bushfire survivors interviews | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  42. Pingback: Inequality growing, new report | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  43. Pingback: Davos, Switzerland 2020 billionaires’ summit | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  44. Pingback: Racist capitalism, Edward Colston’s statue and beyond | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.