Fire safety cuts supporter in London Grenfell inquiry


This video says about itself:

“Don’t tell me this is not political, and please don’t tell me to behave”: Eve Wedderburn. Anger at the scene of the Grenfell Tower fire, Latimer Road, west London 15th June 2017.

By Felicity Collier in Britain:

Ex-fire chief who led cuts appointed to Grenfell panel

Tuesday 12th December 2017

A FORMER fire chief who supported cuts to stations, engines and firefighter numbers has been appointed to the witness panel of the Grenfell Tower inquiry.

The decision to hire ex-chief fire officer (CFO) Steve McGuirk as the first of two days of hearings began yesterday has sparked fury from the Fire Brigades Union (FBU).

Mr McGuirk was in a top role when the service was dismantled meaning it was less able to provide a fast, fully crewed response to fires and other incidents, the union said.

He was also a member of the then Chief Fire Officers Association’s presidential team, which advised central government on the very safety issues that are now being scrutinised in the public inquiry into the Grenfell fire.

Both he and Joyce Redfearn — another panel member, who is a retired clerk to the Greater Manchester Fire & Rescue Authority — were also deputy lieutenants for Greater Manchester (ceremonial appointments representing the Queen), links that were not disclosed when the panel was announced.

FBU general secretary Matt Wrack said: “We need someone who supports much-needed investment into the diminishing fire and rescue service.

“Instead we have a former CFO who has effectively agreed that cutting jobs and fire engines, and closing down fire stations, is justified — he has said as much.

“To place him on the panel of an inquiry into the worst fire since WWII, during which the availability of fire-service resources will inevitably be explored, is irresponsible to say the least.”

Following the FBU’s complaint, the inquiry has promised the union the opportunity to challenge Mr McGuirk’s evidence.

The FBU has also sought permission for an operational firefighter expert to be put on the panel to provide additional evidence and to give an independent peer review of Mr McGuirk’s evidence.

The union wants assurances from the inquiry team that all of the assessors and experts have been asked to declare any involvement in or association with firms that may have installed cladding or insulation windows to high rise residential blocks.

The union has also asked that the first phase of the inquiry proceed without further delay, and in tandem with the police investigation, instead of awaiting its outcome.

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has accused the government of “failing” survivors of the fire after survivors’ group Grenfell United said last week that 118 families would still be in emergency accommodation over Christmas or staying with friends.

Grenfell Fire forum discusses upcoming six month anniversary: here.

Grenfell Tower public inquiry timetable unveiled. First six months to focus on events on night of fire but overall inquiry could last into 2020: here.

32 thoughts on “Fire safety cuts supporter in London Grenfell inquiry

  1. Tuesday 12th December 2017

    posted by Morning Star in Editorial

    PROMISES of rehousing made to survivors of the Grenfell Tower disaster by Tory politicians at national and local level have been revealed as having the consistency of pie crust.

    It beggars belief that, six months on, 150 Grenfell families remain in hotels or other short-term accommodation after Theresa May pledged then that everyone would be rehoused within three weeks.

    There is no reason why that pledge could not have been honoured within, or close to, that timeframe.

    Kensington & Chelsea council is among a handful of the richest in Britain, which could afford council tax refunds to wealthy residents while other local authorities have suffered huge central funding reductions.

    The council ought to have reacted more speedily to allocate permanent accommodation to survivors, but it has dragged its feet.

    Council leader Elizabeth Campbell claims to have “an army of people out there working 24 hours a day, seven days a week,” but she had to acknowledge that flat owners have pulled out of dealings with the council, citing inordinate delays, and sold their property elsewhere.

    That experience does not speak of the urgency required to enable Grenfell survivors to move on to the next stage of their lives.

    Campbell made sympathetic and understanding noises about bereaved families asking council representatives to stay away from Thursday’s national memorial service in St Paul’s Cathedral.

    Frankly speaking, her sympathy and understanding are irrelevant in this situation.

    Far more important will be her council’s accelerated action, belated as it already is, to meet the crucial needs of people who have become used, but not reconciled, to having their interests ignored or patronised.

    Jeremy Corbyn, who was alone among national political leaders in being welcomed by survivors in the immediate aftermath of the inferno, is right to drive home the still unlearned lessons of the tragedy.

    Failure to treat the rehousing programme as an urgent priority is one lesson, but possibly more important is government failure to tackle other potential Grenfells across the country.

    Corbyn’s colleague and Labour shadow housing minister John Healey has posed a question that must be answered — why, six months after Grenfell, have only a small number of 4,000 tower blocks been scrutinised for potential safety failings?

    The inescapable conclusion to be drawn is that, where people from certain social strata are involved, they can be fobbed off with delays and excuses.

    A prime example of patronising Establishment attitudes towards poor working-class people, especially from black and minority ethnic backgrounds, has been Sir Martin Moore-Bick’s official inquiry into the fire.

    He has surrounded himself with a variety of expert advisers and witnesses but has frustrated survivors who feel sidelined by the inquiry.

    There can be no acceptable reason why a bereaved families’ representative should not be appointed to sit on the inquiry panel to ensure that, amid the factual evidence placed before it, the residents’ suffering and loss are not skated over.

    Survivors are not alone in suspecting that they are being shunted to one side, as the decision by the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) to convene its own inquiry illustrates.

    Public disquiet is so widespread over perceptions that national and local authorities have failed bereaved families and survivors that the prompt decision by EHRC can only be helpful in either confirming shortcomings or exposing why popular conceptions are misplaced.

    Finding out the truth is far more important than whether the official inquiry chairman or other notables feel miffed.

    http://morningstaronline.co.uk/a-7004-Grenfell-victims-still-sidelined#.Wi-2PXmDMdU

    Like

  2. Pingback: “Fire safety cuts supporter in London Grenfell inquiry” | Dear Kitty | COMRADE BOYCIE: VIVA THE ANTI-TORY/DUP REVOLUTION!

  3. Pingback: London Grenfell Tower disaster still hurting | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: London Grenfell Tower disaster, after six months | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: London Grenfell Tower disaster, film plans | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: London Grenfell Tower fire survivors interviewed | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: London Grenfell Tower survivors deceived by government | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: London Grenfell Tower disaster, corporations guilty | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: British rulers against Grenfell Tower disaster survivors | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: British Conservative government sabotages fire safety | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: ‘Grenfell’ fire risk in Scottish schools | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: British Conservative government deporting Grenfell disaster survivors? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: British governmental destruction of fire safety | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  14. Pingback: Three Grenfell Billboards Outside Parliament, London | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  15. Pingback: British Grenfell disaster petition gets many signatures | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  16. Pingback: Murdoch media smear London Grenfell disaster survivor | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  17. Pingback: London Grenfell disaster survivor Joe Delaney interviewed | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  18. Pingback: London Grenfell disaster information cover-up | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  19. Pingback: ‘London Grenfell fire disaster was murder’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  20. Pingback: From British Grenfell disaster to local elections | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  21. Pingback: British Conservative government still allowing ‘Grenfell’ flammable cladding | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  22. Pingback: London Conservative politicians blamed for flammable Grenfell Tower cladding | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  23. Pingback: British Conservatives forced to concede on Grenfell Tower disaster | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  24. Pingback: British Grenfell disaster and Conservative government | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  25. Pingback: British firefighters’ tribute to Grenfell disaster victims | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  26. Pingback: London Grenfell inquiry opens with tributes to victims | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  27. Pingback: British government excludes bereaved relatives from Grenfell disaster inquiry | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  28. Pingback: Grenfell disaster, royal wedding in Britain | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  29. Pingback: London Grenfell disaster survivors say government to blame | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  30. Pingback: London Grenfell disaster and Conservative fire safety sabotage | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  31. Pingback: Grenfell activist Delaney against London Review of Books smears | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.