Google censorship of critical Internet sites worsens

This video from the USA says about itself:

Google Intentionally Crushing Left-Wing Websites

13 August 2017

It turns out we don’t have to wait for Net Neutrality to be gutted to see restricted access to left-wing news sites. Google is practicing its own form of censorship by revamping its search protocol to limit your ability to read pages such as Wikileaks, DemocracyNow! and AlterNet. Lee Camp has more on how Google is leading the way in making sure the masses stay uninformed about all the ways in which our capitalist society is killing us.

There is lots of talk about a crusade against ‘fake news‘. Both by United States President Donald Trump, and by the wider political and business establishment, including those with links to the corporate wing of the United States Democratic party.

But what do these two mean by ‘fake news’? It looks like, not the fake news often found in corporate media like Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News. Not the fake news found in the New York Times about Iraq supposedly getting uranium for nuclear weapons from Niger; lies which helped to start George W Bush’s Iraq war.

To Donald Trump, any news critical of Donald Trump is supposedly ‘fake news’ to which people should not have access.

And to the wider political and business establishment, it looks like any news critical of that establishment is supposedly ‘fake news’ to which people should not have access.

How about a part of that establishment, Google corporation?

By Andre Damon in the USA:

Google escalates blacklisting of left-wing web sites and journalists

20 October 2017

In a sweeping expansion of its moves to censor the Internet, Google has removed leading left-wing websites and journalists from its popular news aggregation platform, Google News.

At the time of publication, a search for “World Socialist Web Site” on does not return a single article published on the WSWS. A search for the exact title of any of the articles published during that period likewise returns no results.

Over the past seven days, has referred only 53 people to the World Socialist Web Site, a 92 percent decline from the weekly average of over 650 during the past year.

A Google News search for an article from Thursday's edition of the WSWS returns no results

A Google News search for an article from Thursday’s edition of the WSWS returns no results

Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and author Chris Hedges informed the WSWS Wednesday that his articles had ceased appearing on Google News. Hedges said the change occurred after the publication of his interview with the World Socialist Web Site in which he spoke out against Google’s censorship of left-wing sites.

“Sometime after I gave that interview, they blacklisted me,” said Hedges. “If you go into Google News and type my name, there are six stories, none of which have anything to do with me.”

A Google News search for Chris Hedges returns no relevant results

A Google News search for Chris Hedges returns no relevant results

“I write constantly. Previously, Google News listed my columns for Truthdig and my contributions to Common Dreams and Alternet, as well as references to my books,” Hedges said. “But now it’s all gone. And I’m certain it’s because I spoke out against the Google censorship.”

Google appears to have kept an older version of its news aggregator available online, accessible by visiting and clicking the “news” link below the search bar. That version of the news aggregator, which appears to be in the process of being phased out, lists 254,000 results for the search “World Socialist Web Site”.

A similar search returns 89,600 entries for “Chris Hedges”.

The changes to Google News mark a new stage in a systematic campaign of censorship and blacklisting that has been underway at least since April, when Ben Gomes, the company’s VP of engineering, said Google was seeking to promote “authoritative” news outlets over “alternative” news sources.

Since then, thirteen leading left-wing web sites have had their search traffic from Google collapse by 55 percent, with the World Socialist Web Site having had its search traffic plunge by 74 percent.

“Just speaking as a journalist, it’s terrifying,” Hedges said. “Those people who still try and do journalism, they’re the ones getting hit; especially those journalists that attempt to grapple with issues of power and the corporate state.

“This shows not only how bankrupt the state is, but how frightened it is,” Hedges said.

“Google is developing ever-more intensive methods of targeting, aimed at blocking any dissenting critical voices,” said David North, the Chairperson of the International Editorial Board of the World Socialist Web Site.

“This is an unprecedented attack on free speech. In the history of the United States, censorship on this scale has never been imposed outside of wartime,” he added, pointing to the blocking of Trotskyist publications during World War II.

Hedges noted the precedent of political repression during World War I. “In the name of national security, for the duration of the war they shut down The Masses”, a left-wing, antiwar journal.

The intensification of Google’s crackdown on left-wing sites takes place against the backdrop of a sharp acceleration of the anti-Russian campaign led by congressional Democrats, together with sections of the Republican Party, the US intelligence agencies, and leading news outlets.

On Thursday, Democratic Party Senators Mark Warner and Amy Klobuchar introduced the first piece of legislation to come out of the campaign surrounding the claim that Russia sought to “meddle” in the 2016 election by “sowing divisions” within American society, an unproven conspiracy theory aimed at creating a justification for Internet censorship.

A summary of the bill obtained by Axios stated that it requires “online platforms to make reasonable efforts to ensure that foreign individuals and entities are not purchasing political advertisements in order to influence the American electorate,” and to maintain a database of political advertisements supposedly bought by foreigners.

In his remarks announcing the bill, Warner made clear that his aim was to use it as the starting point for more aggressive restrictions on free speech on the Internet. “What we want to try to do is start with a light touch,” Warner said.

Commenting on the step-by-step nature of the censorship regime being created in the United States, Hedges said, “If you look at any totalitarian system, their assault on the press is incremental. So even in Nazi Germany, when Hitler took power, he would ban the Social Democrats’ publications for a week and then let them get back up. He wouldn’t go in and shut it all down at once.”

“Google is involved in an out-and-out political conspiracy, in coordination with the government,” North said. “A secret censorship program has been created that is directed against opponents of American foreign policy. This is an illegal assault on constitutionally protected rights.”

Hedges added, “I can tell you from having lived in and covered despotic regimes, I think we’ve got to ring all of the alarm bells while we still have the chance, because they’re not going to stop.”

“Google is censoring websites to block dissident views critical of the US establishment”. India: Students and workers in Kolkata oppose Google censorship: here.

New York Times and Wall Street Journal demand censorship of YouTube: here.

Three months ago, the World Socialist Web Site published its first exposé documenting Google’s blacklisting of the WSWS and other left-wing websites. It warned that Google’s actions were part of a sweeping campaign, coordinated with the US government, media and intelligence agencies, to censor the Internet. The period since this initial exposure has seen this campaign develop with extraordinary speed, as the Democratic Party, working with major media outlets, uses unsubstantiated allegations of Russian “hacking” of the 2016 election to mount a drive to criminalize political opposition within the United States. What is involved is nothing less than the greatest attack on the First Amendment since the Second World War: here.

All but admitting that Google is engaged in censorship, Eric Schmidt, executive chairman of Google’s parent company Alphabet, announced that Google will create algorithms designed to “de-rank” web sites such as RT and Sputnik on its news delivery services: here.

Eric Schmidt, the executive chairman of Google’s parent company, Alphabet, confirmed this weekend that the world’s largest Internet company is, in close coordination with the state, manipulating search results to censor sites critical of the US government: here.

Google is escalating its campaign of internet censorship, announcing that it will expand its workforce of human censors to over 10,000, the internet giant announced on December 4. The censors’ primary focus will be videos and other content on YouTube, its video-sharing platform, but will work across Google to censor content and train its automated systems, which remove videos at a rate four times faster than its human employees: here.

World Socialist Web Site International Editorial Board chairperson David North called January 16 for the formation of an international coalition of socialist and anti-war websites and journalists to counter Internet censorship: here.

Since October, Google has been cracking down on how it treats various left-wing news sites, responding to criticism that it has been too censorious of the right: here.

Google search results for abortion services promote anti-abortion centers. When users seek facilities for the procedure, Google Maps often presents ‘crisis pregnancy centers’ that discourage abortions: here.

More than 30 “drill” music videos have been taken down by YouTube of the 50 to 60 videos the Metropolitan Police demanded be taken down over the past two years. The rational for deleting the videos was that they encourage violent behaviour. There is a ludicrous aspect to blaming a musical genre for the very social climate and attendant problems that it reflects. While much drill music takes a backward form, it is a product of growing social distress—reflecting a deeply troubled society, rent by poverty and social inequality, in which many young people face a dismal future. On the basis of a few isolated cases—in which some youths allegedly associated with the drill scene have been involved in violent acts—an entire musical genre is being targeted on the spurious basis that it is responsible for what is described as a “surge” in knife crime and murders in London. The deletion of the videos is the latest act of censorship to be carried out by Google, which owns YouTube. Its readiness to act immediately based on an appeal by the British police is confirmation of the assessment made by the WSWS that Google and the other giant tech conglomerates act as tools of state repression: here.

DEM PAC PAID TO KILL NEGATIVE COVERAGE A HuffPost article that critically covered a Democratic political action committee abruptly disappeared from the top results in Google search after a contractor hired thousands of workers outside of the U.S. this spring to help suppress negative coverage of the PAC’s activities. [HuffPost]

63 thoughts on “Google censorship of critical Internet sites worsens

  1. Google kicked me off youtube during the OWS protest. I crossed the line of unacceptable behavior in a corporate-controlled society: I attacked Capitalism and the terrorist state of Israel.

    Everyone who wants freedom needs o hit the streets and demand an end to Capitalism.


  2. Pingback: Donald Trump’s cronies profiting from Puerto Rico disaster | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: Silencing free spech in the USA | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: US Trump administration threatens Internet neutrality | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: Russia-bashing, pretext for attacking civil liberties | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Friday 1st December 2017

    posted by Steve Sweeney in World

    MEDIA freedom across the globe is at its lowest level for at least a decade, according to a new report which claims that monopolisation of the press, government surveillance and a rise in deadly attacks on journalists are stifling freedom of expression.

    The study by Article 19, a freedom of expression campaign group, along with political and social database V-Dem, warns that journalists are facing an increase in not only physical assaults but attacks in the form of new “draconian” surveillance laws and internet censorship.

    Turkey had the biggest decline in freedom of speech over the last decade with almost 200 media outlets shut down and a third of the world’s total jailed journalists in its prisons.

    The report, published yesterday, measured freedom of expression in 172 countries between 2006 and 2016 using a method called the Expression Agenda.

    It used 32 social and political indicators including media bias and corruption, internet censorship, access to justice, harassment of journalists and equality for social classes and genders.

    The report claims that the growth of the internet is partly to blame for the global crackdown as a handful of secretive companies and search engines are in control of censoring much of the world’s online content.

    Although freedom of expression has declined in many authoritarian countries including Burundi, the report notes that free speech is also under attack in democratic countries.

    Article 19 spokesman Thomas Hughes believes that Britain was responsible for one of the most draconian surveillance laws in the world through the Investigatory Powers Act, also known as the Snoopers’ Charter.

    The act gives government the power to hack into people’s personal computers, phones and any other device.

    Britain’s National Union of Journalists (NUJ) general secretary Michelle Stanistreet also warned that British journalists are “subjected to invasive surveillance laws,” with those who reported on Edward Snowden’s leaks still subjected to an ongoing police investigation.

    But Ms Stanistreet said that, while governments deliberately target journalists to prevent public scrutiny of their actions, it is not just physical threats that undermine the ability of journalists to do their jobs.

    She said: “Precarious working conditions, redundancies and extensive job cuts, the concentration of media ownership and rampant commercialisation are all enabled by specific legislative frameworks and government laissez-faire attitudes.

    “The need for independent and ethical journalism is greater now than it has ever been, but, in almost every country, the media are undergoing significant turmoil and crisis.”


  7. Pingback: The Levellers in British history | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: American Green party witch-hunted in ‘Russia’ hysteria | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: Young people don’t want to become spies | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: ‘Fake news’ term abused by Trump, United States Democrats | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: Internet censorship gets worse | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: Davos billionaires’ meeting and their fears | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: Facebook becoming censorshipbook and spybook | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  14. Pingback: YouTube censors German anti-fascist video | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  15. Pingback: Censorship on the net | Citizens, not serfs

  16. “Citizens not serfs” is a tiny player, but I am having extreme difficulty accessing relevant research material and am blocked from accessing my site. Of course you can access any WordPress site from any other, but I can’t get any WordPress site to open. The only way I managed to re-blog this article was by logging in to WordPress and then using the Reader. But I cannot see what I have re-blogged. It seems to me internet censorship of liberal/progessive/socialist/free-thinking, even humanitarian sites are being suppressed. Of course, what you don’t see, you don’t know about. Many, many problems in this area. It urgently needs major focus by those who are trying to exercise freedom of thought, and exercise their democratic rights.


  17. Google is lying to women about abortion–and it needs to stop.

    All over the country, women who search for “abortion clinic near me” are shown ads for what appear to be abortion clinics but are actually so-called “crisis pregnancy centers” (CPCs)–fake clinics run by right-wing extremists who lure women and then manipulate or harass them out of getting an abortion.1

    These fake clinics’ staff pose as medical professionals to tell women all sorts of medically disproven lies, like abortion causes suicide, infertility, or breast cancer. Really.

    Google agreed to take these ads down several years ago–and thanks to UltraViolet members and allies at NARAL, Yahoo soon followed. But Google either fell asleep on the job, or outright lied, because reports just uncovered more of these ads on Google nationwide.2

    Google is WRONG for helping CPCs trick women. But Google responds to public pressure. For the sake of the two million women each month who Google “abortion or “abortion clinic,” these ads need to be taken down. Can you sign the petition?

    Tell Google: “Keep your word. Take down ads that intentionally lie to women seeking information about abortion.”
    Sign the petition

    Imagine this: a woman seeking an abortion, or accurate information about abortion, clicks through one of these ads designed to trick women and makes an appointment. She may think she’ll see a real medical provider.

    She spends time and money to get to this clinic. She may have had to find child care, since six in ten women who have an abortion already have at least one child.3 But she won’t know what she’s gotten into until she gets to a CPC in person. Once there, she’ll likely face manipulation, misinformation, and shaming. CPCs are known to:

    Falsely promise a woman she will miscarry, therefore eliminating the need for an abortion. One CPC lured women in by offering a free ultrasound, told them “about one in four pregnancies ends naturally, in what is called a miscarriage or spontaneous abortion” (the actual number is half that), and promised to predict whether they were “a candidate for natural pregnancy termination.”4

    Counsel women into staying with abusive partners. In another case, a CPC counselor spoke with a young mother of two who was considering an abortion because her boyfriend was violent. The counselor argued for her to stay in the abusive relationship, telling her, “for all you know, the baby changes him.”5

    Tell women that abortion causes cancer, infertility, and psychological damage–all of which are blatant lies.6

    The problem is so widespread that states like California have begun to regulate lying CPCs. The Supreme Court is set to hear a case on that next month.7 But that case only applies to signs posted on the clinic building itself. When it comes to searching online, Google, as a trusted search provider, has a responsibility to its consumers. CPCs need to play by the same advertising rules as everyone else. A woman using the search terms “abortion clinic” likely is seeking abortion care, which CPCs deliberately dupe women into thinking they provide. Women deserve medically accurate information–NOT lies and deception.

    Will you sign to tell Google to stop tricking women about abortion?

    Thanks for speaking out!

    –Nita, Shaunna, Kat, Karin, Adam, Holly, Kathy, Susan, Anathea, Audine, Shannon, Emma, Pilar, Natalie, Melody, Pam, Lindsay, and Ryan, the UltraViolet team


    1. Google search results for abortion services promote anti-abortion centers, The Guardian, February 13, 2018

    2. After Google win, NARAL targets Yahoo ads, The Hill, May 7, 2014

    3. Characteristics of U.S. Abortion Patients, 2008, Guttmacher Institute, May 10, 2008

    4. The Truth about Crisis Pregnancy Centers, NARAL Pro-Choice America, accessed February 21, 2018

    5. Ibid

    6. Ibid

    7. Supreme Court agrees to hear antiabortion challenge to California disclosure law for pregnancy centers, Los Angeles Times, November 13, 2017


  18. Pingback: Big Brother Palantir spying in New Orleans, USA | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  19. Pingback: European Union wants more Google, Facebook censorship | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  20. Pingback: Google collaborates with United States drone assassinations | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  21. Pingback: PayPal censors socialist book on Iran | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  22. Pingback: More military spending than ever | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  23. Pingback: Facebook censors Arizona teachers’ group | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  24. Pingback: Honduras dictatorship using British spyware | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  25. Pingback: Google workers oppose complicity in war crimes, resign | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  26. Pingback: Google’s role in drone murder condemned | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  27. Pingback: Billionaires got $1.8 trillion richer in 2017 | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  28. Pingback: Convicted violent nazi ‘Tommy Robinson’ no ‘free spech martyr’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  29. Pingback: Another Facebook privacy scandal | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  30. Pingback: Facebook censoring non-corporate media voices | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  31. Pingback: Google wants film censorship to whitewash medieval Frank monarchy | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  32. Pingback: More government Internet censorship in Britain | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  33. Pingback: United States cartoonist sacked for anti-Trump cartoons | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  34. Pingback: ‘Google stops Pentagon drone killing collaboration’, protesters’ victory | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  35. Pingback: YouTube favouritism for Murdoch, other corporate media | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  36. Pingback: Facebook censors United States anti-nazis, opponents of Trump’s xenophobia | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  37. Pingback: Facebook, other Internet censorship | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  38. Pingback: British sexually abusive police spies and Lush cosmetics campaign | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  39. Pingback: Stop Internet censorship | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  40. Pingback: Facebook anti-leftist political censorship | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  41. Pingback: ‘Iranian propaganda’ censored, Saudi propaganda welcome on Facebook | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  42. Pingback: British Labour ‘Facebook tax’ plan | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  43. Pingback: Trump, Google lie about Internet censorship | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  44. Pingback: More Internet censorship in the USA | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  45. Pingback: Facebook outsources Internet censorship to unskilled underpaid Filipinos | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  46. Pingback: Facebook outsources censorship to far right | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  47. Pingback: Trump, Pence anti-China warmongering | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  48. Pingback: United States Pentagon Internet censorship plans | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.