This 20 September 2017 video from the USA is called San Francisco and Oakland sue top five oil and gas companies over costs of climate change.
From Reuters news agency:
California cities sue big oil firms over climate change
Sept 20 – California cities San Francisco and Oakland filed separate lawsuits against five oil companies on Wednesday seeking billions of dollars to protect against rising sea levels they blamed on climate change, according to public documents.
The lawsuits, filed in state courts in San Francisco and Alameda Counties, alleged Chevron Corp, ConocoPhillips, Exxon Mobil Corp, BP Plc, and Royal Dutch Shell Plc, created a public nuisance and asked for funds to finance infrastructure to deal with rising sea levels.
According to a news release from San Francisco city officials, the lawsuits mirror 1980s-era lawsuits against tobacco companies. They allege the oil giants “knowingly and recklessly created an ongoing public nuisance that is causing harm now and in the future risks catastrophic harm to human life and property.”
Shell said in statement the issue should be addressed by government policy and cultural change, not by courts.
So, Shell says, leave climate change to climate denialist Donald Trump and his ex-Exxon boss Secretary of State Tillerson.
Exxon called the lawsuits’ claims without merit, and said it would defend itself. ConocoPhillips declined to comment. BP did not respond to a request for comment.
“Congress and the Trump administration are AWOL on climate change,” said Ken Kimmell, president of the Union of Concerned Scientists, saying the courts were the appropriate venue to address rising sea levels and other climate impacts.
The lawsuits are the latest in a growing body of legal action against oil companies over climate change. Prosecutors for New York and Massachusetts are investigating Exxon, for example, over the possibility it misled investors in public statements on the risks of climate change.
Marin and San Mateo counties and Imperial Beach, California, in July brought similar public nuisance and failure to warn lawsuits alleging climate change impacts. Those three lawsuits sued the same five plus other oil companies and coal producers.
The cases are People of the State of California V. BP et al., San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC 17-561370, and People of the State of California V. BP et al., Alameda County Superior Court Case No. RG17875889. (Reporting by Gary McWilliams; editing by Diane Craft)
NICARAGUA PLANS TO SIGN THE PARIS CLIMATE ACCORD Leaving the U.S. and Syria as the only countries to reject the global plan to cut emissions. [HuffPost]
Nicaragua originally did not sign as the Paris agreement did not go far enough.
The film Climate of Concern shows that Shell was perfectly aware of Climate Change and its impacts as early as 1991.
Yes; and not just Shell, all big oil corporations already knew much earlier:
Reblogged this on Die Erste Eslarner Zeitung – Aus und über Eslarn, sowie die bayerisch-tschechische Region!.
Pingback: Dinosaur extinction and bird evolution | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Volkswagen pollution stopped by Greenpeace | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Sutherland Springs, Texas massacre, why? | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: British censorship of BP oil critics | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: German warplanes, not another Shell earthquake in Groningen | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Australian oil spying on East Timor, whistleblowers persecuted | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: NATO governments obeying my militarism, Trump says | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: An Inconvenient Truth 2, climate change film review | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Donald Trump’s worldwide wars for oil | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: British Conservatives funded by climate denialist polluters | Dear Kitty. Some blog