22 thoughts on “‘Centrist’ politics, what is it really?

  1. Friday 8th September 2017

    posted by Morning Star in Features

    SOLOMON HUGHES asks who the real political grown-ups are: the straight-talking Laura Pidcock or the neoliberal ‘moderates’?

    THERE is a regular, plaintiff cry from the “moderate” centre of politics that goes like this: “Can we have the grown-ups back?”

    It’s a cri de coeur from those who believe in their hearts that centrist politics comes from sensible, grown-up heads. Their ideas are adult, thought-through, sensible. The left’s ideas are naive, silly, childish and unachievable.

    But drawing the left as the Kevin and Perry of politics and the “moderates” as their long-suffering parents is itself based on a deep strain of naivety among the supposedly “sophisticated” technocrats. A naivety that has been on display for decades.

    In August Labour’s new MP for North West Durham, Laura Pidcock, said she disagreed firmly with Tory MPs and had “absolutely no intention of being friends with any of them.

    “I have friends I choose to spend time with. I go to Parliament to be a mouthpiece for my constituents and class; I’m not interested in chatting on.”

    Her comments are much milder than those of Anuerin Bevan, who spoke of a “a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party” because the pain they inflicted on the nation in the 1930s made him feel they were “lower than vermin.”

    Pidcock’s views are well within the Labour tradition. But her straightforward answer to a question from the “Skwawkbox” website inspired a wave of criticism from “moderate” Labour and Tory commentators.

    Pidcock’s insistence that she goes to Parliament to work for her constituents, not make friends with Tory MPs was called “childish” and the politics of the “student union” by Conservative and “moderate” Labour commentators.

    They think being angry at Tories isn’t “grown up” and that it won’t “get things done” — which is odd, because Pidcock saying she wants to go to work to get change for her constituents, rather than treating the House of Commons as a social event, sounds pretty businesslike.

    And the much angrier Anuerin Bevan was able to “get things done” — chiefly founding the NHS — precisely because he was driven by strong feelings.

    The Pidcock-patronisers are part of a broad trend. One that says any attempt to change things on the scale of Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour manifesto is naive, that his wing of Labour is made up of childish, unrealistic dreamers, and that they are not “professional” politicians.

    In February the Guardian spurted out this nostalgia for their “moderate” daddy in an editorial on Tony Blair’s latest pronouncement: “Mr Blair reminds us what it was like to have grown-ups in charge.”

    This “let’s have the grown-ups back” call is repeated by a lot of sad moderate dads. It makes me wonder where they have been for the past 17 years. Because the “centre” has been anything but mature. Instead, it has been the place of the most naive and embarrassing wishful thinking.

    We saw a very embarrassing recent demonstration of this naivety when James Chapman, an ex-Daily Mail political editor, former adviser to George Osborne, and current adviser to lobbyists Bell Pottinger, declared he was setting up a new “centrist” party called the “Democrats” to “stop Brexit.”

    Many “sensible,” “moderate” Labour commentators enthusiastically took Chapman’s amateurish plan seriously.

    Everybody one-click further to the left could see some Tory lobbyist was not the answer to anything, that this would not work as a grassroots project and that it was just wistful dreaming.

    So it proved. The credulity of the New Labour and David Cameron Tory supporters of this half-baked scheme was embarrassing. But in truth it was not new.

    Being credulous and not understanding the “real world” are the hallmarks of many claiming to be “realists.” Like the naivety of Brown and Blair in backing the Private Finance Initiative.

    Only the truly innocent would believe handing control of school, hospital and other public buildings to bankers and contractors would be “efficient.” The left warned it would be a rip-off. And it was.

    Or the foolish belief that handing sensitive public service contracts to a mix of caterers, security firms, and totally dubious outfits like Sodexol, Serco, G4S or A4e would bring new, exciting methods to the welfare state — rather than the old fashioned scams and rip-offs that the left warned about.

    Or the pre-crash naivety of believing unregulated banks would deliver prosperity for all, for ever.

    This wide-eyed view of corporations was ingrained into New Labour at the start and happily picked up by the Cameron crew.

    From the very beginning New Labour people fell in love with all corporations, including the obviously crooked. Peter Mandelson spent much effort trying to get Labour to love the US energy firm Enron.

    People on the left looked closely at Enron’s record of safety breaches, economic and environmental crime, and warned they were bad news.

    But New Labour’s leaders insisted on taking cash from Enron (as did the “sensible” Fabians) before the firm collapsed under the weight of its own criminal behaviour.

    New Labour’s leaders also decided the best way to celebrate the Millennium was not to — say — build new hospitals.

    Instead they thought a corporate sponsored entertainment palace celebrating all that big business could offer was a wise plan. Only a true sucker could buy the Dome, but that’s what they did.

    With criminal credulousness the same “moderates” believed a US Republican government stuffed with oil men would lead a “liberation” of Iraq, rather than the badly run corporate-led occupation that we got.

    With the eternal sunshine of the centrist mind, many saw the Iraq project go bad, but then expected the re-run in Libya in 2011 to be ok. Cameron and “New Labour” types queued up, wide eyed, to walk into that trap.

    In truth, it is really naive to believe there is a technocratic policy in the “centre” that can solve big problems. It is childish to believe that big corporations don’t try and break rules to squeeze out profits, that rich people don’t avoid tax, that US governments want to go to war to “liberate” anyone.

    The past 200 years have shown us that “grown-ups” can change society by using popular pressure to redistribute money, to regulate big business and to reform the state in favour of the majority.

    Socialists pushed for big reforms that began as ideals, but became practical realities, where centrists averted their eyes from the failures in the existing system.



  2. Pingback: German anti-Polish revanchism | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: Tony Blair, satiric video | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: Extreme right in German parliament, why? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: British secret police against democracy | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. The Tories’ analysis is all wrong. It’s not just the young they’ve screwed

    WILL Philip Hammond launch a “big, bold Budget” with a major offer to the young? Or will it feature continued cuts, with a half-arsed attempt to cover them with a small squeak of giveaways and gimmicks?

    The pressure is on, because the Conservatives are having a collective nervous breakdown about their continuing loss of popularity to Corbyn.

    My guess is Hammond will fail to turn the Tories around. Not least because they’ve got the wrong analysis.

    They think that “the young” — by which they mean young professionals — are losing faith with capitalism because they don’t have the chance to get the houses and security of their parents. So they will try and juggle resources between the young and old.

    But what is really happening is that, as the 2008 financial crisis showed, capitalism has become more exploitative and less productive.

    By bailing out the banks without reforming the financial system, we’ve allowed a deeply extractive capitalism to limp on. It’s chasing us all and biting who it can.

    This means it catches the weakest members of the herd first, including the young.

    But the lack of social housing, rent rises, the bedroom tax, wage stagnation, job casualisation, welfare cuts are painful for everyone who is not cushioned by owning property or other capital.

    Capitalism hasn’t just turned on the young, it has turned on all the vulnerable groups, including the low-paid, middle-aged, the poorer pensioner, etc.

    A “big, bold Budget” would transfer wealth and power from the rich to the rest, not the old to the young. But it isn’t something Phil Hammond can see on his spreadsheet.



  7. Pingback: British Labourite poet banned by Blairites for satiric Blair poems | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: Chelsea Manning’s United States Senate campaign and her opponents | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: Macron attacks French workers again | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: Italy after the election | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: Trump, Macron, partners in crime | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: Scottish Conservative politician supports Honduras, Haiti dictatorships | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: Private prison corporate Democrats help Trump’s ICE | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  14. Pingback: ‘Populism’, a much abused word | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  15. Pingback: United States 2020 presidential election candidates news | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  16. Pingback: Belgian elections, ‘centrist’ flirt with extreme right | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  17. Pingback: Candidate Biden scared of climate debate, stops it | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  18. Pingback: United States presidential candidate Joe Biden | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  19. Pingback: Hillary Clinton attacks Sanders, helping Trump again | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  20. Pingback: Germany after the Hanau nazi massacre | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.