This video from Texas, USA says about itself:
Austin Bats under Capital Bridge HD with a red light
Filmed in April of 2012 on a Canon HD DSLR
Red light has no effect on bat activity
Changing the colour of artificial light could reduce disruption
Artificial light at night can have a disruptive effect on bats, but not if the light is red. Switching to red light may therefore limit or prevent habitat loss for rare, light-shy bat species. The latest issue of Proceedings of the Royal Society B publishes results from five years of pioneering research led by the Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW).
It’s the first time researchers have succeeded in measuring the effects of light with different spectra on the activity of slow-flying, light-shy bats in their foraging habitat. “We’ve found these bats to be equally active in red light and in darkness”, says principal researcher Kamiel Spoelstra. “White and green light, on the other hand, substantially reduce the bats’ level of activity.”
The effect of red light on more common bat species such as the pipistrelle is reduced as well. While there’s a strong increase in activity of this species in white and green light, activity in red light is comparable to that in darkness. This is caused by the strong attraction of insects to white and green (not red) light. Pipistrelles opportunistically feed on these accumulated insects.
“The lack of effect of red light on both the rarer, light-shy species and the more common non-light-shy bats”, concludes Spoelstra, “opens up possibilities for limiting the disruption caused by external, artificial lighting in natural areas, in situations where having light is considered desirable.”
One of the things that make this research unique is that the intensity of the light used for the experiments holds up under real-life conditions. “In fact, it’s entirely suitable for use on country roads.” The scale and duration of the experiments also make them quite unique.
Bats hunt for insects at night because there’s not much competition from other animals, and predators won’t see them because it’s too dark. Which is why artificial light can cause such disruption: less common, slow-flying species such as Natterer’s bat or the brown long-eared bat may feel vulnerable to visual predators such as owls.
Agile flyers such as the pipistrelle, on the other hand, don’t mind the extra light. On the contrary: streetlights come in handy for them for catching more insects. Larger bat species such as the serotine bat and the lesser noctule, finally, fly high and don’t seem to care either way.
“So for the more common species”, says Spoelstra, “artificial light can serve as a facilitator while less common species face potential loss of habitat.” Together with fellow scientists from NIOO and Wageningen University … he tried to find out if adjusting the colour of the light could limit or prevent this effect.
Over a five-year period, the researchers studied bat activity under experimental white, green and red LED-light conditions. For this, they used the one-of-a-kind facilities of the ‘Licht op Natuur’ (“light on nature”) project: eight study sites along forest edges in dark parts of the Netherlands. Each study site consists of four rows of streetlights in a single colour, and a control row of unlit streetlights.
The Licht op Natuur project isn’t ‘just’ about bats, however. The study sites are used to measure the effects of artificial light on a wide range of species including mice, larger mammals, plants, moths, soil animals and birds.
Some of the main partners in the project are Natuurmonumenten (the Netherlands Society for Nature Conservation), Staatsbosbeheer (State Forestry Commission), … the Drentse Landschap Foundation and the municipality of Ede. Data are compiled with support from the main Dutch non-governmental data managing organisations (PGOs). …
The research team expects to issue comprehensive advice – based on the response of all species groups studied – on the use of artificial light by the end of this year.