Donald Trump’s dangerous warmongering, a British view

This video from the USA says about itself:

Extraordinarily Dangerous: Chomsky on How Trump’s Threats Toward North Korea Could Backfire

5 April 2017

President Trump will be meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday at his Florida resort Mar-a-Lago. Ahead of the meeting, Trump said in an interview with the Financial Times he would be willing to take unilateral action against North Korea over its nuclear weapons program. Trump said, “If China is not going to solve North Korea, we will.” His warnings come after the U.S. and the South Korean militaries staged weeks-long training drills throughout March, while North Korea launched rocket engine and missile tests. For more, we speak with world-renowned political dissident, linguist and author Noam Chomsky.

By Matt Willgress in Britain:

Washington’s wars endanger us all

Saturday 22nd April 2017

Donald Trump is proving the most dangerous president in living memory – and Theresa May his willing sidekick. We must resist, argues MATT WILLGRESS

This week, Donald Trump’s provocative actions and bombastic, militaristic statements have contributed to creating concern around the globe at a frightening stand-off with nuclear-armed North Korea. The NBC News reported: “The National Security Council has presented President Donald Trump with options to respond to North Korea’s nuclear programme — including putting UK nukes in South Korea or killing dictator Kim Jong Un.”

But this is not an isolated incident of gung-ho foreign policy from the US president, who seems to be using it to distract from political problems at home just as with the bombing of Syria.

As John Rees from the Stop the War Coalition put it: “After years of 140-character warnings against involvement in Syria, Trump’s latest in a series of screeching U-turns needs some explanation. The decision marks another abandonment of the insurgent Trump persona and his rapid alignment with the US foreign policy establishment.”

Indeed, while during his election campaign Trump had often seemed to favour an isolationist foreign policy, now US intervention seems to be increasing all over the globe.

As we reach 100 days of his presidency next week, we have not only seen warships sail towards the Korean peninsula. We have also seen missile attacks on Syria plus the deployment of 1,000 troops there — Trump now looks set to send another 1,000 — the use in Afghanistan of a weapon of mass destruction distastefully called “the mother of all bombs,” an increase in air strikes on Yemen and Iraq, the expansion of US warzones in Somalia and Yemen and a spike in US drone strikes.

Trump has said he is “making it easier for the Pentagon to launch counter-terrorism strikes anywhere in the world” and has loosened restrictions on preventing civilian deaths that were put in place by the Obama administration.

Linked of course to all of this is his fanning of the flames of hatred — just as George Bush utilised a rise in Islamophobia to help justify his wars.

In Latin America, Trump has whacked more sanctions on Venezuela actively seeking to pursue “regime change” in that country through the auspices of the OAS.

He is going ahead with building a wall on the border with Mexico and his spokespeople have implied this could be enforced by military means.

The now disgraced and departed General Michael Flynn seems to have summed up the Trump administration’s mindset on foreign affairs when he said: “We’re in a global war, facing an enemy alliance that runs from Pyongyang, North Korea, to Havana, Cuba and Caracas, Venezuela,” adding that “along the way, the alliance picks up radical Muslim countries and organisations such as Iran, al-Qaida, the Taliban and Islamic State [ISIS].”

Before he departed, Flynn also made a surprise appearance at one of the daily press briefings to announce that the administration was putting Iran “on notice” after the country conducted a ballistic missile test.

Flynn may have gone, but his new “axis of evil” hit list seems to have stayed and is being acted on.

So contrary to what many who voted for him may have thought, Trump’s regime signals a sharp turn to even more aggressive interventions, which is bound to ratchet up tension around the world.

If this wasn’t bad enough, then we come to his stance on nuclear weapons and the possibility of a new arms race.

As Kate Hudson of CND put it: “In uncertain times the last thing anyone needs is the most powerful man on Earth kicking off a new nuclear arms race. But that’s exactly what president-elect Trump did just before Christmas.”

Hudson was responding to Trump tweeting that: “The United States must greatly strengthen and expand its nuclear capability until such time as the world comes to its senses regarding nukes.”

To be clear, the US is not short of nuclear weapons — it already has 7,300 nuclear warheads plus plans to spend over £282 billion on maintaining and modernising these over the next decade.

Some of these weapons are many times more destructive than the Hiroshima bomb so the US already has the capacity to destroy all life on Earth multiple times.

In an act of total irresponsibility and against the spirit of international agreements, Trump has even suggested that more countries should get nuclear weapons and that he would be OK about an arms race in Asia, mentioning Japan and South Korea as countries that could go nuclear.

He has also announced he wants £42bn extra to be spent on tanks, ships and weapons systems. Again, it’s not as if the US doesn’t already have a massive arms arsenal. Indeed, US arms spending is more than the next eight countries combined, including China and Russia.

This will not benefit US voters as the extra spending on wars and weapons will divert funds from investment at home and cut international aid for some of the poorest around the world.

Not only is this not in the interest of the US or international peace and security, it also matters here in Britain. Theresa May’s government’s close alignment with Trump, including its support for the attacks on Syria and, possibly, committing to higher arms spending as Trump desires, is detrimental to British interests.

It is, therefore, important to step up the campaigning against honouring him with a state visit and making sure that if he does come, we have the “mother of all protests.”

Matt Willgress is communications officer for Stand Up to Trump. Visit to ask your MP to sign a statement against Trump’s visit to Britain.

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP WANTS A 15 PERCENT CORPORATE INCOME TAX RATE A steep change from the current rate of 35 percent. [Reuters]

‘ANY HALF-DECENT HACKER COULD BREAK INTO MAR-A-LAGO’ “Our inspections found weak and open Wi-Fi networks, wireless printers without passwords, servers with outdated and vulnerable software, and unencrypted login pages to back-end databases containing sensitive information.” [ProPublica]

10 thoughts on “Donald Trump’s dangerous warmongering, a British view

  1. Pingback: ‘Trump’s USA most dangerous to peace’, British trade unionist says | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  2. Pingback: May Day, International Workers Day, approaching | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: United States soldier dies in Somalia | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: Trump not welcome in England | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: G20 for rulers, police state for people in Hamburg, Germany | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: Donald Trump and nuclear war, Sinatra parody song | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: North Korea to South Korean Olympics, USA not? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: United States meddling in Latin America | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: Donald Trump sabotages peace process in Korea | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.