These pictures from Japanese neo-nazi Kazunari Yamada’s website show him posing with Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s internal affairs minister, Sanae Takaichi, and Abe’s party’s then policy chief, Tomomi Inada; now minister of
war … sorry for forgetting to use the euphemism ‘defence’ … of Japan.
By Peter Symonds:
Japanese imperialism rearms
24 March 2017
Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) is exploiting the extremely tense situation on the Korean Peninsula to push for its military to be able to carry out “pre-emptive” strikes on an enemy such as North Korea. The acquisition of offensive weapons, such as cruise missiles, for the first time since the end of World War II would be another major step by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s government to rearm Japan, heightening the danger of war.
Commenting on North Korean missile tests, Defence Minister Tomomi Inada suggested on March 9 that Japan could acquire the capacity for “pre-emptive” attacks. “I do not rule out any method and we consider various options, consistent of course with international law and the constitution of our country,” she said.
Hiroshi Imazu, chairman of the LDP’s policy council on security, was more forthright: “It is time we acquired the capacity. I don’t know whether that would be with ballistic missiles, cruise missiles or even the F-35 [fighter], but without a deterrence North Korea will see us as weak.” The policy council plans to submit a proposal in the current parliamentary session with a view to its inclusion in the next five-year defence plan.
Inada’s caveat notwithstanding, the purchase of weapons of aggression would openly breach Article 9 of the Japanese post-war constitution, which renounces “war … and the threat or use of force as a means of settling international disputes” and declares that “land, sea and air forces, as well as other war potential, will never be maintained.” Such a move would also dispense with the longstanding legal fig leaf that Japan’s existing military forces are purely for self-defence.
To date, Japanese governments have baulked at the acquisition of obviously offensive weapons, such as ballistic missiles, aircraft carriers and long-range bombers, not least because of widespread anti-war opposition among Japanese workers and youth. On Wednesday, however, Japan commissioned the Kaga, its second helicopter carrier. The ships are the largest put into operation by the Japanese military since World War II and could be modified to carry fighter aircraft.
The Abe government, the most right-wing in post-war history, has greatly accelerated the drive to remilitarise Japan and remove legal and constitutional restraints on its armed forces. Since coming to office in 2012, Abe has used the slogan of “pro-active pacifism” to justify increased military budgets, the establishment of a US-style National Security Council to centralise war planning in the prime minister’s office and a shift in the strategic focus of the military from the north to the southern island chain, adjacent to the Chinese mainland.
Abe underscored his confrontational stance toward Beijing at the 2014 World Economic Forum in Davos where he drew a false comparison between China today and German imperialism in 1914 so as to brand China as “aggressive” and “expansionist.” He deliberately heightened the dangerous standoff with China over the disputed Senkaku/Diaoyu islets in the East China Sea by insisting his government would not enter negotiations over their status with Beijing.
In 2015, the Abe government provoked huge protests against legislation that, under the deceptive banner of “collective self-defence,” allows the Japanese military to participate in US-led wars of aggression.
Abe has campaigned on the program of making Japan “a normal nation” with a strong military—in other words, for Japanese imperialism to prosecute its strategic and economic interests through all, including military, means. The LDP is pushing for a complete revision of the constitution, including the modification or removal of Article 9. The document has long been regarded in right-wing militarist circles as an “occupiers’ constitution” drawn up by the United States to render Japan impotent.
Abe and his cabinet have very strong links to ultra-right groupings such as Nippon Kaigi, which campaigns for a new constitution, promotes militarism and patriotism, and seeks to whitewash the crimes of Japanese militarism in the 1930s and 1940s. Nippon Kaigi’s parliamentary grouping includes 280 of the 717 parliamentarians in the lower and upper houses. Significantly, Abe is a special adviser to the organisation and 16 of his 20-member cabinet are members. He is now embroiled in scandal over claims that his wife, allegedly acting on his behalf, gave a cash donation to the ultra-nationalist operator of a private kindergarten in Osaka that indoctrinates pre-school children in Japanese patriotism.
The drive to remilitarise is being fuelled by the worsening crisis of Japanese and world capitalism, and the deep concern in Japanese ruling circles about the country’s historic decline, underlined by its relegation to the third largest world economy, behind China. As well as boosting the military, Abe has sought to extend Japanese influence, including military ties, especially in Asia, through the most active diplomatic drive of any post-war prime minister.
The Abe government has prosecuted remilitarisation under the umbrella of the US-Japan military alliance and with the active support of Washington. In part, this is to avoid stirring up memories of Japan’s wartime atrocities in Asia and generating opposition in the region to Japanese imperialism. Abe has also sought to continue to work closely with the Trump administration. He was one of the first world leaders to visit Trump after the US election, and again after Trump took office.
Trump’s installation, however, has profoundly destabilised world politics, including in Asia. His repudiation of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) was a blow to the Abe government, which had invested considerable political capital in overcoming opposition within the LDP, in order to ensure its ratification. Abe regarded the economic pact as critical to countering Chinese economic clout, ensuring a dominant position in Asia for Japan, in league with the US, and overcoming the protracted stagnation of the Japanese economy.
Moreover, Trump’s “America First” demagogy and threats of trade war have not just been directed against China. He has a long history of denouncing Japan for its trade surplus with the United States and “unfair” trade practices. During the US presidential election campaign, Trump also called into question the US-Japan Security Treaty, threatening to walk away if Japan did not pay more toward the cost of US military bases in the country. He even suggested that Japan should protect itself by building its own nuclear weapons.
As in Europe, all the geo-political fault lines that led to two disastrous world wars in the 20th century are emerging again. The Abe government’s determination to rearm Japan as rapidly as possible is not about countering the “threat” posed by North Korea, but defending the interests of Japanese imperialism by every means, compounding the danger of war. As in the 1940s, intense rivalry for markets, raw materials and cheap labour could fuel trade conflicts between US and Japan and a competition to dominate Asia, ending in a catastrophic war that would inevitably engulf the region and the world.
Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) has called on the government to boost the country’s anti-ballistic missile systems and to consider acquiring, for the first time, weapons capable of carrying out attacks on enemy bases. The recommendations are another step towards the remilitarisation of Japan pressed by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe that is adding to sharp regional tensions: here.
Japanese PM plans to remove constitutional shackles on the military by 2020: here.
The intensifying tensions over the Korean Peninsula are being utilised by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s Japanese government to accelerate the overturn of key restraints on militarism embodied in the country’s post-World War II constitution. It is also whipping up war scares in the population to justify the acquisition of military hardware designed for offensive warfare: here.
Japan using North Korea as pretext to acquire offensive weapons: here.
Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s cabinet yesterday approved a record-high draft budget for the 2018 fiscal year. The plan includes increased spending on the military as Tokyo continues to rearm. The money allocated to the armed forces has steadily risen under Abe throughout his five years in office: here.
With military tensions focued on the Korean peninsula little attention has been paid to the militarisation of Japan by right-wing premier Shinzo Abe. KENNY COYLE reports.
Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) is preparing a draft revision of Article 9 of the constitution, which currently binds Japan to renouncing war, by the end of the month so as to have a finalized proposal for its convention on March 25: here.
Pingback: Japanese government’s extreme right scandals | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Friday 31st March 2017
posted by Morning Star in World
JAPAN’S ruling party said yesterday that the government must invest in ballistic missile armaments and upgrade its offensive military capacity.
The Liberal Democratic Party’s council on defence policy argued that the ability to “strike an enemy base, with cruise missiles for instance” would “further improve deterrence” and was a necessary response to North Korean missile tests.
But any such move would further undermine Japan’s famous “peace constitution,” which in Article 9 outlaws war.
Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe previously pushed for an amendment to the constitution which would allow Japan to deploy its military when allies are supposedly threatened.
On failing to win constitutional change his government imposed a “reinterpretation” of Article 9 in 2014 expanding the range of circumstances in which Japan’s “self-defence forces” can fight.
The defence council said “provocative acts” from North Korea — Pyongyang has tested four ballistic missiles this month, three of which have landed in Japanese waters — meant Tokyo “should not waste any time to strengthen our ballistic missile defence.”
But a beefed-up Japanese military will alarm China, which lost nearly 30 million people in the genocidal Japanese invasion during World War II.
Relations are already frosty following Tokyo’s announcement this month that it plans to settle Japanese citizens on an island chain known as the Diaoyu islands in China and the Senkaku islands in Japan.
Both countries claim the uninhabited islands, and an active Japanese plan to populate them would risk sparking clashes.
Rearmament is also opposed by Japan’s Communist Party, which yesterday condemned the government for its failure to participate in the United Nations conference on banning nuclear weapons.
Its chairman Kazuo Shiji led a party delegation to the talks in New York, which are not supported by any of the world’s nuclear weapons states — with the US, Russia, Britain, France and Israel opposing them outright and China, India and Pakistan abstaining.
Hiroshima survivor Setsuka Thurlow, 85, said Japan could play a key role in international disarmament by taking politicians to visit Hiroshima and Nagasaki to see the devastation that remains 72 years on.
She condemned its refusal to do so and its collaboration with the US nuclear “umbrella” as hypocritical.
Pingback: Donald Trump against human rights | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Japanese right-wing government loses local election | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Nazi-condoning Japanese war minister resigns in scandal | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Guam people against Trump’s Korea nuclear warmongering | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Donald Trump threatens nuclear war | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: United States war profiteers getting richer | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Japanese right-wingers love Trump | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Japan’s military sexual slavery and South Korea | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Trump and Japan’s Abe, right-wing friends and rivals | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: More military spending than ever | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Pro-peace poem | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Scottish anti-Semitic Blairite Murphy’s hypocrisy | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: G7 summit Quebec, trade war and protests | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Japanese revanchist right-wingers want more taxpayers’ money for wars | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Big Okinawa demonstration against US military base | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Japanese cyberspace minister knows nothing about computers | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Japan’s nazi-friendly war minister resigns | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Donald Trump spends taxpayers’ money on wars | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Expensive Japanese F-35 warplane already crashed | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: G20 summit in Osaka and trade wars | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Biarritz, France G7 summit police state | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Typhoon disaster in Japan, TEPCO, government fail | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Japanese militarism abused ´comfort women´, new film | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Trump, Abe warmongering continues, COVID-19 or not | Dear Kitty. Some blog