United States children hurt by post-Trump election racism

This 14 November 2016 video from the USA is called SPLC‘s Richard Cohen condemns Steve Bannon as Trump’s top adviser.

By Theresa Albano in the USA:

Kids are worst affected by the barrage of hate

Friday 2nd December 2016

President-elect Donald Trump has so far failed to take seriously the surge in hate crimes his campaign inspired, writes THERESA ALBANO

ALARMED by the spike in hate-related incidents in the wake of Donald Trump’s electoral college victory on November 8, a coalition of civil rights groups and educators called on the president-elect to clearly and publicly denounce racism and all forms of bigotry and hate.

At a November 29 media conference, the Southern Poverty Law Centre (SPLC) said it documented 867 bias-related incidents in the 10 days following election day.

Anti-immigrant bias topped the SPLC list of hate-related harassment. Latinos, Asians and Africans made up the largest number of targets, regardless of immigration status or citizenship. Anti-Black and anti-semitic incidents ranked numbers two and three. There were also many anti-Muslim incidents.

“Mr Trump claims he’s surprised his election has unleashed a barrage of hate across the country,” said SPLC president Richard Cohen. “But he shouldn’t be. It’s the predictable result of the campaign he waged. Rather than feign surprise, Mr Trump should take responsibility for what’s occurring.”

The SPLC released two reports, one on the 867 bias-related incidents and the other detailing the findings of a survey of 10,000 teachers since the election. According to SPLC, 90 per cent reported that the school climate has been negatively affected, and 80 per cent described heightened anxiety and concern among minority students worried about the impact of the election on their families.

Cohen said teachers described an increase in the use of slurs and derogatory language, along with disturbing incidents involving swastikas, nazi salutes and Confederate flags.

Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), told the media conference: “A president-elect has to create a climate that keeps all Americans safe.” Schools and universities were the most common places for incidents to happen. Most often the incidents were through graffiti and verbal harassment, according to SPLC’s information.

At an AFT-sponsored town hall phone conference on November 22, Weingarten told participants the union would “do everything in our power to stop any kind of action against our immigrant families, our Muslim families, our Latino families and especially our undocumented students.”

In addition to resources already developed for teachers, professors and educational staff, the AFT released a six-point action plan for support of children and their families.

Among the 867 incidents in the report, “Ten Days After,” were multiple reports of black children being told to ride in the back of school buses; the words “Trump Nation” and “Whites Only” being painted on a church with a large immigrant population and a gay man being pulled from his car and beaten by an assailant who said the “president says we can kill all you faggots now.”

In the teacher survey report, “After the Election, the Trump Effect,” more than 2,500 respondents said they knew of fights, threats, assaults and other incidents that could be traced directly to election rhetoric.

Since the election, approximately 675,000 people have signed SPLC petitions calling on Trump to distance himself from white nationalists and other extremists and to dump Stephen Bannon as his chief strategist and counsellor.

In an interview on “60 Minutes,” Trump — when told about some of the harassment — said if it was his supporters for them to “stop it.”

In an interview with the New York Times, Trump denounced the white supremacist movement. But he needs to do more, the groups said.

“This polarised and divisive election has left its mark on all of us, but most tragically on our children,” said Janet Murguia, president of the Latino advocacy group National Council of La Raza, to the media conference.

“We have heard countless stories of harassment, intimidation and bullying of Latino and other students in schools around this country. This cannot stand.”

Trump outlines right-wing program of extreme nationalism at Cincinnati rally: here.

4 thoughts on “United States children hurt by post-Trump election racism

  1. Thursday 1st December 2016

    posted by Morning Star in Features

    Trump’s deliberate usage of techniques developed by nazi propagandist-in-chief Joseph Goebbels is but one of the many worrying signs – equally dangerous is the West’s all too apparent indifference, suggests JOHN GREEN

    NOT many months ago Donald Trump was the joke candidate in the US presidential elections, the clown, the bogeyman outsider.

    However, as Michael Moore noted perceptively at the time: the pundits and political elite myopically underestimated the man and his popular appeal because they were completely out of touch with ordinary people.

    Almost a century ago another man with a ridiculous moustache, a shrill voice and theatrical gestures was also mocked.

    On the back of mass unemployment and poverty in the country as well as widespread dissatisfaction with the mainstream parties, he rose rapidly to power.

    Like Trump, he also promised to make his country great again and rid it of the “vermin” who were undermining the nation’s moral fibre and its economy.

    I’m not suggesting that Trump is the new Hitler, but there are very worrying parallels. Just look at what Trump has said during his campaign and who he is appointing to his new cabinet.

    His main campaign slogan, “Make America great again” and his major promises to improve the US economy by emphasising “straight talking,” patriotism and standing against “political correctness” could have come straight out of Joseph Goebbels’s nazi propaganda bible, in which he emphasised the need to “avoid abstract ideas — appeal to the emotions; constantly repeat just a few ideas, use stereotyped phrases; give only one side of the argument; continuously criticise your opponents; and pick out one ‘enemy’ for special vilification.” Sound familiar?

    Trump is not a natural master of rhetoric, but he has internalised the points Goebbels makes and is playing on the fears of those whose jobs are at risk, whose communities have been devastated by capitalist greed, by blaming immigrants and foreigners.

    “I will build a great wall — and nobody builds walls better than me … I will build a great, great wall on our southern border, and I will make Mexico pay for that wall. Mark my words,” he repeated.

    “When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending the best. They’re not sending you, they’re sending people that have lots of problems and they’re bringing those problems to us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists … And some, I assume, are good people.”

    Not satisfied with a vilification of Mexicans, he turned on the Muslims, calling for a ban on Muslims entering the US.

    His racism is further underlined by his remarks about Obama, first doubting the details of his birth and then implying that he is associated with (black) thugs. “Our great African-American President hasn’t exactly had a positive impact on the thugs who are so happily and openly destroying Baltimore,” he said.

    ?As if that were not enough, he has views on global warming that are medieval: “It’s freezing and snowing in New York — we need global warming!” he quipped. He has also appointed a climate change denier to oversee the transition of the Environmental Protection Agency and he is planning to quit the Paris climate deal.

    In his first interview with CBS after his election, Trump said that he would expel or jail up to three million undocumented immigrants from the US who are “criminal.” And that future Supreme Court nominees would be “pro-life” — that is anti-abortion and would defend the constitutional right to bear arms.

    All this should have set alarm bells ringing around the globe and invoked outrage, but instead Trump is rapidly becoming accepted by government leaders and the mainstream media. It’s not unlike the way Hitler, Franco and all the other dictators were treated in their day, with kid gloves — it’s called appeasement.

    In Trump’s case the apple has clearly not fallen far from the tree. His father, Fred Trump, was once arrested at a KKK rally and was sued by the US Justice Department for refusing to rent flats to African-Americans. Donald Trump inherited his property-owning father’s wealth, which was lucky as he was clearly no high-flyer at school. He was expelled at the age of 13 and sent to the New York military academy.?

    Most past US presidents have been right-wing but we broadly knew that we were getting what it said on the packet. With Trump, for the first time, we have an unpredictable, but reactionary individual.

    It is, though, not only Trump we should fear but those extreme right-wingers he is appointing to his cabinet. His chief strategist is Steve Bannon, a former Goldman Sachs investment banker who runs the right-wing Breitbart News Network website, and appears to be as misogynist as Trump.

    Buzzfeed quotes Bannon as saying that one of the unintended consequences of the women’s liberation movement is that “the women that would lead this country would be feminine, they would be pro-family, they would have husbands, they would love their children. They wouldn’t be a bunch of dykes that came from the seven sisters schools.”

    Bannon has connections to the alt-right — a loose group of people with far-right ideologies who reject even mainstream conservatism in the US and believe in white supremacy. He believes that those who believe in a progressive agenda espouse a philosophy of victimhood. “They’re either a victim of race. They’re a victim of their sexual preference. They’re a victim of gender. All about victimhood and the United States is the great oppressor, not the great liberator,” he says.

    In the divorce court Bannon’s ex-wife Louise Piccard accused him of being an anti-semite, saying that he had made anti-semitic remarks about choice of schools, not wishing to send his daughters to a local school beloved of Jewish families because “Jews raise their children to be whiny brats.” He has denied the accusation.

    If Bannon’s actual words don’t disqualify him from holding a top position in the Trump White House, the headlines he published at Breitbart should: “Birth control makes women unattractive and crazy,” “There’s no hiring bias against women in tech. They just suck at interviews.” “World Health Organisation report: Trannies 49x higher HIV rate.”

    Then there is Reince Priebus, chairman of the Republican National Committee (RNC), who has been appointed as Trump’s chief of staff. He worked to bring Wisconsin’s Tea Party movement together with the mainstream Republican party organisation.

    Newt Gingrich is another close adviser to Trump. He was one of those influential advisers to Ronald Reagan who adopted his idea of an “opportunity society” as laid out in his book, Window of Opportunity.

    Gingrich encouraged Republicans to “speak like Newt” and put out a memo containing lists of words with negative connotations such as “radical, sick” and “traitors.” That, too, could have come from Goebbels’s notebook. That is how fake news and lies become mainstream, particularly when magnified by the right-wing press and other media.
    Boris Johnson, our modern-day version of Chamberlain, is likely to meet Gingrich when he visits US shortly. He claimed Trump’s election should be seen as a “moment of opportunity” for Britain.

    After complaining about the “whinge-o-rama” in response to the election result, he added: “I think there is a lot to be positive about and it is very important not to pre-judge the president-elect or his administration.”

    Theresa May also appeared to support Trump’s stance when speaking this week at the Lord Mayor’s banquet, when she adopted her tribune of the working people pose: “People — often those on modest to low incomes living in rich countries like our own — see their jobs being outsourced and wages undercut. They see their communities changing around them and don’t remember agreeing to that change,” adding: “When you fail to see that the liberal consensus that has held sway for decades (sic) has failed to maintain the consent of many people, you’re not the champion of liberalism but the enemy of it.” In other words, Trump’s election is the answer to years of failed liberalism.

    We have to demand of our government that it has no truck with Trump and his vitriol. If he is not vehemently opposed and his dangerous rhetoric exposed, the insidious march of right-wing populism will gain traction elsewhere too.



  2. Pingback: Anti-Trump demonstrations worldwide, 20-21 January | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: British demonstrators interviewed on Trump and May | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: United States Trump’s racist sidekick Bannon and national security | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.