Volkswagen fraudster fat cats in denial

This video from the USA says about itself:

How tests that exposed VW emissions fraud were done

25 September 2015

An Air Specialist with the California Air Resources Board demonstrates the testing similar to that which exposed the VWemissions fraud. Due to legal reasons, he was unable to address the VW findings specifically. Reaed more here.

By Dietmar Henning in Germany:

VW denies emissions fraud in Europe

11 November 2016

The emissions fraud discovered in September last year and the resulting penalties and fines, amounting to billions of euros, have already shaken the Volkswagen Corporation to its foundations. Since then, the arrogant denials of responsibility by those in positions of power in the company have driven the corporation and its 600,000 employees deeper and deeper into the abyss.

When Volkswagen CEO Matthias Müller declared in an interview in the US at the beginning of the year that the company was not conscious of any guilt and that the criminal emissions manipulation was a small “technical problem,” this was viewed as a mere public relations failure. Since then, VW has conceded that it not only “cheated,” but also swindled the authorities and customers with the help of the automatic cut-out feature for emission control.

Two months ago, a Volkswagen engineer pleaded guilty in a court in Detroit of taking part in emissions manipulations. According to Norddeutscher Rundfunk (NDR), the 62-year-old admitted that until May 2008, he took part in “a conspiracy” at the corporate headquarters “lasting ten years.”

According to the engineer, the work on special fraudulent software for the US market began around 2006 in the diesel engine development department. He is “one of many at Volkswagen” who are implicated in the emissions scandal, said his defense attorney.

In the US, VW is paying at least €15 billion in penalties and fines for just under a half million automobiles. At the last count, 11 million automobiles were sold with the fraudulent software, including 8 million in Europe.

Now the VW corporation is claiming that its actions were legal in Europe, unlike in the US. Press reports in the Süddeutsche Zeitung, the NDR and the Westdeutscher Rundfunk (WDR) have quoted company legal briefs, according to which the software built into the automobiles does not constitute “a prohibited switch-off device according to European law.” Accordingly, it claims that there are no grounds for accusing the company of manipulation.

Indeed, VW goes even further. The corporation even disputes that the nitric oxide emissions of the Diesel cars are harmful to health. “It is impossible to determine scientifically the number of cases of illness or even death for certain population groups on the basis of what we know.”

The reason for these obvious lies is clear. Claims for damages by customers in Europe have to be prevented at all costs. However, this attitude could have repercussions for the corporation and its 12 brands that go far beyond the feared compensation payments. In particular, its sales numbers could be damaged for years to come.

The situation is similar for Audi, its luxury subsidiary. Audi had long claimed that it did not manipulate emissions numbers, which turned out to be a lie. In fact, Audi developed a three-litre diesel engine with software that produced false emissions readings. The six-cylinder engine is in the VW Touareg, the Porsche Cayenne and the Audi A8. Audi is currently in negotiations with the US over penalties, fines and compensation payments for 85,000 US customers. Consequently, VW has raised its liabilities from about €400 million to €1.8 billion.

It has now emerged that Audi not only manipulated nitric oxide emissions, but also its carbon dioxide emissions, and it has done so in gasoline engines as well as diesel engines.

The Bild am Sonntag reported last weekend that the California environmental agency CARB discovered a software-based manipulation in the six-cylinder Audi engine and some automatic transmissions. If the steering wheel is not turned at startup in the usual way for a chassis dynamometer, the shift strategy is activated, which leads to a lower consumption and carbon dioxide emission reading. If, on the other hand, the steering wheel is turned more than 15 degrees, which it normally is, the normal switching program is activated—with higher emissions.

Axel Eiser, who was responsible for these motors at that time supposedly already knew about the “cycle optimized switching program” in 2013. Since then, Eiser has been promoted to head of motor development at VW.

VW stock holders have also made claims in the billions of euros. They accuse the VW executive of finding out about the emissions manipulation too late last year and thereby of violating the requirements of the ad hoc reporting obligations of the stock corporations.

The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) sued the entire VW executive board last year, but the Braunschweig Public Prosecutors Office only initiated proceedings against Martin Winterkorn, who was president at that time, and VW brand executive Herbert Diess. Now the Attorney General has announced that it has also initiated an investigation of VW Board of Directors Hans Dieter Pötsch. He was the chief financial officer and was responsible for stock market communications.

If VW is held responsible for the “manipulation of the capital markets,” this could become expensive. Investors have sued the company for more than €8 million in damages.

The owner families Porsche and Piëch, the Social Democratic Party (SPD)-ruled state of Lower Saxony, which has a market share of 20 percent in the company, and IG Metall, whose Chairman Jörg Hofmann sits on the VW supervisory board, have all lined up in support of Pötsch.

The owner families, the SPD and the union, as well as their representatives on the executive board and the works council, are like the representatives of an autocratic regime shortly before its collapse. Cut off from the outside world, they live in their own world and believe they can do whatever they want. This was already made clear when, at the end of April, the managers pocketed €63 million, while the employees were forced to endure heavy cuts.