Hitler’s Holocaust in the Soviet Union, Berlin exhibition


This video says about itself:

Germany: Steinmeier opens exhibit on Nazi Germany’s ‘forgotten’ Soviet Union holocaust

27 September 2016

German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier opened an exhibition titled “Mass shootings, the Holocaust from the Baltic to the Black Sea 1941-1944″ in the Topography of Terror museum, in Berlin, on Tuesday.

By Verena Nees in Germany:

Berlin exhibition—“Mass Shootings: The Holocaust from the Baltic to the Black Sea 1941-1944”

28 October 2016

Mass Shootings: The Holocaust from the Baltic to the Black Sea 1941–1944, September 28, 2016–March 17, 2017

A small, but nonetheless very significant exhibition—75 years after the invasion of the Soviet Union and the massacre of thousands of Jews at Babi Yar in Ukraine—is currently on display at the Berlin Documentation Centre, a history museum in Berlin located on the site where the Gestapo and SS had their headquarters from 1933 to 1945. The Documentation Centre displays documents, photos, videos and audio exhibitions related to the Nazi crimes.

The exhibition, “Mass Shootings: The Holocaust from the Baltic to the Black Sea 1941–44,” draws attention to the little known fact that shortly after the invasion of the Soviet Union by the German military on June 22, 1941, Nazi paramilitary death squads collaborated with the military and police in a systematic campaign of mass shootings of Jews, other civilians and Soviet Red Army members. The commanders later introduced the use of special vehicles for gassing victims so as to spare the soldiers the images of screaming women and children.

One feature of the Second World War that generally goes unexamined is the fact that of the 6 million Jews who were exterminated, more than 2 million died in the Soviet Union as a result of such mass executions and not in concentration camps.

The visitor in Berlin stands shocked and shaken in front of a map near the entrance to the exhibition. The Babi Yar massacre of September 29–30, 1941, in which 34,000 Jews from Kiev in Ukraine were killed, is notorious. But the sheer scale of the mass shootings marked on the map by black points is less well known.

Some 570 locations are marked on the map on territory that stretches from Riga in Latvia to the Black Sea. In this area, according to current research, there were 1.5 million victims. As a text explains, the black points only count the towns, cities and villages where at least 500 Jewish women, children and men were shot. In addition, there were many crime scenes where non-Jews were massacred: Communist officials, Roma, or patients of psychiatric institutions. There were also a great number of massacres with smaller victim totals that remain to be examined sufficiently by researchers.

The documents at the Berlin exhibition include shocking pictures of the mass shootings at Babi Yar and other locations, which were taken secretly by Wehrmacht [German military] soldiers and not handed in to the commanders in violation of orders. There are also operational reports from the heads of various army units, which detail the numbers shot, and documents from legal proceedings after the war, in which many of the convicted commanders of the Wehrmacht units were rapidly set free. The German army’s participation in the mass shootings was kept quiet for years.

A large portion of the exhibition treats the destruction of the Jewish community of Mizocz in the western Soviet border area of Volhynia (which today straddles Poland, Ukraine and Belarus). The Polish section of Volhynia, which includes the small town of Mizocz, was given to the Soviet Union in the secret protocol of the Stalin-Hitler pact in 1939. In Volhynia alone, some 160,000 Jews were murdered between May and December 1942.

With its timeline of events in Mizocz, the exhibition gives the mass shootings a face. Photos from the period prior to 1941 show a Catholic kindergarten; women taking a walk; a sugar factory, in the vicinity of which the mass shootings occurred in October 1942; pictures from family albums; members of the Socialist-Zionist youth association Gordonia with a sign reading “Workers’ Group.”

Executions in the forest, public executions and finally the brutal mass shooting in October 1942, in which all 1,500 Jewish men, women and children lost their lives, are all documented. A gendarme’s post captured the shooting in photos. The rescue efforts of one Gräbe, a leading engineer in the firm of Josef Jung that employed many Jewish forced labourers, are documented, as is the formation of a youth resistance group in September 1942, which armed itself with axes, knives and iron bars.

In addition, the “Mass Shootings” exhibition makes clear the central role played by the Ukrainian Resistance Army (UPA) in the persecution of the Jews. It was the UPA that drove the Jews out of Mizocz to the trenches. In the subsequent period, members of the UPA, who are celebrated today by Ukrainian fascists as heroes, hunted down Jews who survived.

The Berlin exhibition, however, is not limited to documenting the horror. It makes clear that the mass shootings were not the result of excesses by one or several commanders, but rather the outcome of a policy deliberately pursued by the Nazi leadership.

Prominent place is given to a June 6, 1941 order. More than two weeks before the beginning of Operation Barbarossa [the invasion of the USSR by the German military], it was issued by the Wehrmacht leadership and ordered that all political commissars in the Red Army be “in principle eliminated immediately.”

“It cannot be expected that in the struggle against Bolshevism, the enemy will behave according to the standards of humanity or international law,” the order of the OKW (supreme command of the Wehrmacht), which was signed by Alfred Jodl, declared by way of justification. “Leniency and the respecting of international law when dealing with these elements” would therefore be wrong, and further, “The originators of the barbaric-Asiatic methods of combat are the political commissars. Therefore, all ruthlessness must be used immediately and without restraint.”

On July 2, 1941, the chief of the security police and the SD [SS intelligence agency], Reinhard Heydrich, issued an order to the leading SS and police commanders, “All officials of the Comintern, (as well as all professional communist politicians) are to be executed; the middle and radical officials of the party, the central committees of regional party organisations; people’s commissars; Jews in the party and state positions; other radical elements (saboteurs, propagandists, snipers, attackers, agitators and so forth.)”

Two things become clear as a result. First, the central goal from the outset was to exterminate the “Jewish-Bolshevik” leadership of the Soviet Union. Hitler hated the Jews above all because they had played an important role in the October Revolution and the workers movement. A left-wing journalist during the Weimar Republic, Konrad Heiden, summarised this point, “Not Rothschild the capitalist, but Karl Marx the socialist provoked Adolf Hitler’s anti-Semitism.” (Konrad Heiden, Der Fuehrer, 1944, p. 58)

Second, the war against the Soviet Union, unlike the war in the West, was planned as a war of annihilation. This was underscored by the opening lecture of the current Berlin exhibition titled “Barbarossa: strategic planning and political decisions, June 1940–June 1941,” delivered by the Freiburg-based historian Ulrich Herbert. Already in July 1940, less than a year after the Hitler-Stalin pact, Hitler informed the army leadership of his decision “to eliminate Russia.”

Herbert noted that under the slogan “Lebensraum [living space] in the east,” Hitler intended to conquer colonial territory for German big business to exploit raw materials and create space for settlement and the securing of foodstuffs. To this end, long before the beginning of the war, SS leader Heinrich Himmler requested a group of academics at Berlin University, led by agricultural scientist Konrad Meyer, to prepare the Generalplan Ost [General Plan East]. It envisioned the conquered territories to be free of people, thus requiring the extermination or deportation of the existing population.

Herbert rejects the claim by the German revisionist [amateur] historian Ernst Nolte in the 1980s that the Nazi war of annihilation was a preventive strike and an “understandable reaction” to the violence of the Bolsheviks, which triggered the famous “historians’ dispute.”

Stalin’s terror in the late 1930s directed against the Bolshevik leaders of the October Revolution, which also virtually decapitated the Red Army, played into Hitler’s hands. When the Wehrmacht invaded, the Soviet Army was taken by surprise and suffered severe losses. The numbers of dead in the USSR, 27 million in total, including 14 million civilians, speak for themselves.

Nolte justified his position in words almost identical to those of the Nazis’ “commissar” order: “Did Hitler perhaps carry out an Asiatic act because they and others like them feared becoming potential or real victims of an Asiatic act?” (Ernst Nolte, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, “The Past That Will Not Pass”, June 6, 1986)

Today, this historical revisionism in Germany is being revived and intensified by the occupant of the chair of Eastern European history at Humboldt University, Professor Jörg Baberowski. In his books Scorched Earth: Stalin’s Reign of Terror and Spaces of Violence, he attacked the “mass violence” of the “Bolsheviks,” which allegedly laid the basis for the acts of violence by the Wehrmacht. In a 2007 publication, Baberowski went on to claim, “Stalin and his generals imposed a new type of war on the Wehrmacht, which no longer spared the civilian population.” Unlike Nolte, Baberowski removes the question mark.

The Berlin exhibition on “Mass Shootings” provides a stunning refutation of this historical falsification and demonstrates how similar it is to the propaganda of the Nazis themselves.

82 thoughts on “Hitler’s Holocaust in the Soviet Union, Berlin exhibition

  1. Pingback: Ukrainian nazis’ massacres of Poles, new film | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  2. Monday 7th

    posted by Morning Star in Arts

    The Last Days of Stalin
    by Joshua Rubenstein
    (Yale University Press, £25)

    THERE is always an understandable fascination with great or notorious historical personalities. That’s particularly the case with Stalin, shrouded as he has been in Kremlin-imposed secrecy, veiled in mystique and characterised by gruesome anecdote.

    But books which give undue weight to the individual, largely ignoring social and historical contexts, distort rather than unearth underlying truths. Dealing only with the short period before Stalin’s death and the immediate aftermath, Joshua Rubenstein avoids this trap by placing the man and the event firmly in the contemporary context.

    He homes in on the notorious “doctors’ plot,” in which a group of almost exclusively Jewish doctors who had looked after the health of top government officials were accused of a conspiracy to kill their patients. The plot arose in the context of an anti-semitism that had deep roots in Russian society and Stalin played on that to whip up an unprecedented anti-Jewish hysteria that echoed that of the nazis, only recently defeated in the war.

    Even Molotov, Stalin’s quasi deputy, was not spared. His Jewish wife was arrested and interned for zionism in 1949 and only released after Stalin’s death.

    While vividly illustrating the paranoia and fear permeating the Soviet state under Stalin, Rubenstein is particularly revealing in his portrayal of Western responses to Soviet attempts at rapprochement and co-existence. While the Soviet Union, certainly until Stalin’s death, was far from being a socialist state, the West depended on its continued demonisation in order to maintain stability in its own sphere of influence and to suppress socialist aspirations.

    Yet even under Stalin, the Soviet Union strove for peaceful co-existence with the West and sought amicable solutions to international problems.

    And Rubenstein shows that after his death, the new leadership strove to open up a new and conciliatory relationship with the West and overcome the cold war legacy, overtures peremptorily dismissed by the US.

    Despite pleading by Winston Churchill and other US advisers that the death of Stalin offered new opportunities for post-war detente and that Russian offers should be taken seriously, US President Eisenhower ignored them, a position echoed by West German Chancellor Konrad Adenauer.

    The fear was that if the West was seen to be even sitting around the same table as the Russians it would undermine resolve and destroy the carefully nurtured image of a dangerous enemy, a view that unfortunately prevailed.

    Rubenstein’s book certainly raises the question of what could have happened if the genuinely conciliatory overtures by the Soviet Union had been taken up at that time.

    Would we have seen an early end to the cold war and to the disastrous arms race, ushering in what could have been a new world order rather than a continuation of the dangerous confrontational politics that kept the world on the verge of nuclear holocaust for so many years?

    Review by John Green

    http://morningstaronline.co.uk/a-9e4f-Measured-view-of-end-times-of-Stalin#.WCJXdcmbIdU

    Like

  3. Pingback: Nazi salutes at Washington Trump election victory celebration | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: Jewish girl’s birthday ruined by nazi cupcakes | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: Nuclear weapons for Germany? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: Austrian Auschwitz survivor says don’t vote racist | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: Trump nominees’ contact with Austrian racists | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: Adolf Hitler’s nazi professors | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: Stop commemorating Holocaust, German extreme right says | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: German government escalates neocolonial war in Mali | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: Islamophobic terrorist bloodbath in Canada | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: French historian arrested in the USA | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: Jörg Baberowski, German extreme right professor | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  14. Pingback: Forced military conscription back in Sweden | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  15. Pingback: Russian poet Yevtushenko dies | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  16. Pingback: Marine Le Pen defends French anti-Semitic crime | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  17. Pingback: Spanish government reburies fascist with military honours | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  18. Pingback: Austrian mercenary suspect of war crimes in Ukraine | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  19. Pingback: Jewish Ukrainian persecuted for death of Hitler collaborator | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  20. Pingback: Neo-nazi network in German armed forces | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  21. Pingback: Nazi paraphernalia in German army barracks | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  22. Pingback: German army covers up neo-nazi scandal | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  23. Pingback: Ukrainian neonazi death threats against anti-Hitler veterans | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  24. Pingback: Another German army officer arrested in neonazi teror scandal | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  25. Pingback: Anti-Semites attack Jewish Moroccan Dutch woman | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  26. Pingback: Neonazi terrorist German army scandal update | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  27. Pingback: Neonazi scandal in German army update | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  28. Pingback: Anne Frank’s stepsister’s lecture on Holocaust and xenophobia | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  29. Pingback: New German barracks still named after Hitler’s old marshal Rommel | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  30. Pingback: Tony Blair’s Iraq war crimes | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  31. Pingback: German militarism and nazism | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  32. Pingback: German government censors leftist Internet site | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  33. Pingback: Jewish Soviet author Ilya Ehrenburg | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  34. Pingback: British elite soldier arrested for neonazi terrorism | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  35. Pingback: German anti-Polish revanchism | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  36. Pingback: Extreme right AfD in German parliament | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  37. Pingback: British World War II veteran on today | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  38. Pingback: 95-year-old Hitler survivor on German neofascist AfD | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  39. Pingback: British Ukip’s links to German neonazis | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  40. Pingback: German pro-peace artist Käthe Kollwitz | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  41. Pingback: Fascism and anti-fascism in Poland | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  42. Pingback: German corporation stops selling nazi stuff | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  43. Pingback: German right-winger wants ‘final solution’ of the refugee question | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  44. Pingback: Anne Frank inspiration to help African refugees in Israel | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  45. Pingback: Germany, from Auschwitz to today | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  46. Pingback: French political establishment nice to neo-fascist Jean-Marie Le Pen | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  47. Pingback: Ex-Austrian President Waldheim, new film | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  48. Pingback: Trump brings Iraq war ‘mastermind’ Bolton back | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  49. Pingback: Massacre in Alphen, the Netherlands, and political counter-revolution | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  50. Pingback: World War I, May 1918 | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.