This video from England says about itself:
Linda Kaucher: Stop CETA protest, 70 Fleet St London, 25/09/2015, Pt 1
27 September 2015
The EU-Canada trade deal CETA will allow foreign investors to sue governments in secret tribunals for policies that threaten their profits. Members of the European Parliament will vote soon on whether to accept the deal. Our MEPs must understand that the huge public anger voiced around the EU-US TTIP deal hasn’t gone away. They should reject the dangerous and undemocratic CETA.
Why is this important?
It’s one year since Canada and the EU agreed a trade deal known as CETA (the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement).
CETA hasn’t entered into law yet – first it needs to be voted through European and national parliaments – but this could happen as soon as early next year. This is much sooner than the EU-US trade deal TTIP (Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership), which is still being negotiated.
The text of CETA is public and reveals that it contains a lot of the same threats as TTIP. It would make it easier for bad deals like TTIP to be successful. This is why, when CETA comes to the European Parliament, we need our MEPs to vote against it.
Reasons to stop CETA include:
– The agreement contains Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS), which allows foreign investors to sue governments for policies they regard as threatening future profits. This could include minimum wage policies, environmental protection, and renationalising public transport, health and education services.
– US investors with bases in Canada will be able to sue our governments for billions too – so they wouldn’t need TTIP‘s ISDS to do damage. 80% of US companies operating in the EU have bases in Canada.
– CETA contains no such provisions for workers’ rights: no compensation, no enforcement, and certainly no secret tribunals!
This video is the sequel.
By Peter Lazenby in Britain:
Leave Ceta to rot says zombie rally
Saturday 29th october 2016
ZOMBIES protested in London yesterday, demanding that European Union officials leave a discredited transatlantic trade deal “dead and buried.”
The costumed protesters from the Global Justice Now movement were targeting the London office of the European Commission, which is trying to revive the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (Ceta) between the EU and Canada.
Like the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, a parallel deal between the EU and the US, Ceta would give corporations the power to sue governments in a corporate court for any loss of profits — real or potential — caused by legislation such as minimum wage laws, limits on working hours and health and safety rules.
Until Thursday, Ceta was blocked by opposition from the Belgian region of Wallonia, but, following significant concessions to the regional parliament, ratification is now expected to take place within days.
Global Justice Now director Nick Dearden said: “Essentially the EU’s trade policy now lies in tatters.
“It is true that Ceta has been brought back from the dead for now, but it is a ticking time bomb.
“The Wallonia parliament has a promise that they will be able to stop the ratification of Ceta when they get a formal vote on it, and unless there are substantial changes, they — and hopefully other parliaments — will use that veto.
“What’s more, the whole ‘corporate court’ concept will now go to the highest European court to adjudicate on its legality, something which risks invalidating the EU’s entire trade agenda.”
Mr Dearden condemned the British government for not allowing a parliamentary debate on Ceta.
European and Canadian civil society groups call for rejection of CETA: here.
The European Union (EU) and Japan last week agreed in principle to ratify a free trade agreement (FTA) that is seen as a pointed challenge to the Trump administration’s “America First” nationalism and threats of trade war. Despite being hyped as a victory for free trade over protectionism, the FTA signals the accelerating division of the world into competing trade blocs and the growing danger of trade conflict and war: here.
Pingback: Clinton, Trump, a British view | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: TTIP-style deals help extreme right | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Tuesday 22nd November 2016
posted by Zoe Streatfield in Britain
THE Scottish Greens have warned that the NHS in Scotland is under threat of privatisation after it was revealed that it had not been exempted from the Ceta free trade deal.
Following parliamentary questioning by the Greens, the Scottish government’s Economy Secretary Keith Brown admitted that NHS Scotland had not been specifically listed as being exempt from the Ceta trade deal signed by the European Union and Canada.
Scottish Green Party food and farming spokesman Mark Ruskell has called on the Scottish government to publish its assessment of the impact of Ceta on Scotland, but ministers have refused, saying it is “legal advice.”
“The UK government has previously said that the NHS would be exempt from controversial trade deals including TTIP and Ceta,” said Mr Ruskell.
“It’s a worry that NHS Scotland has not been listed separately in the treaty, and I would urge the Scottish government to seek clarity on this point.”
Mr Ruskell called on ministers to take action to prevent Ceta which he described as a “corporate power grab” that poses a threat “not only to our public services but to our economy.”
Global Justice Now trade campaigner Guy Taylor also voiced concerns about Ceta’s affect on public services.
He warned: “One of the biggest threats posed by the toxic trade deal between Canada and the EU is that it would ‘lock in’ the privatisation of public services.
“Richard Branson is quietly hoovering up large amounts of the NHS through Virgin Care, and if Ceta was to come into force it would make it impossible to take such vital services back into public ownership,” he said.
Pingback: Scottish singer Calum Baird interviewed | Dear Kitty. Some blog
posted by Morning Star in Britain
by Felicity Collier
EURO MPs are meeting today to decide whether the secretive EU-Canada free trade deal can be justified on environmental grounds.
Belgian Green MEP Bart Staes has produced a draft report recommending that the environment, public health and food safety committee oppose the Ceta deal as it doesn’t do enough to protect the planet — and urging the European Parliament to vote against it next month.
But free-trade fanatics are rallying to get the committee behind the deal, producing amendments leaving the stinging attacks in the report intact, but giving consent to the deal nonetheless. Campaigners have been urging the public to contact the committee’s MEPs to urge them to block Ceta.
War On Want’s Mark Dearn said that the outcome of today’s meeting will “put huge pressure on the final vote.”
Campaign group noTTIP urged: “We desperately need people to wake up to the fact that Britain is a signatory to Ceta and will remain so until we completely leave Europe.”
The deal could be passed within the next two months, “with large swathes of it immediately put in place,” noTTIP said.
“After that happens those already struggling in the UK’s brittle Brexit economy will feel the squeeze of yet more anti-worker policy-making.”
Campaigners are planning an international day of action on Saturday January 21, centring on a major demo in Brussels.
And on Thursday January 26, British campaigners will hold a public meeting at Westminster University with Green MEP Jean Lambert and others.
Tuesday 7th February 2017
posted by Steve Sweeney in Britain
Activists demand a Commons debate on shady free trade deal
CAMPAIGNERS protested outside Parliament yesterday against a government “cover-up” for refusing a Commons debate on a trade deal that puts “democracy and public services up for sale.”
The Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement (Ceta) is a “secretly negotiated” trade deal between Canada and the European Union that will “undermine our democracy and destroy our basic rights,” campaign group Ceta Blockers argued.
They slammed a European committee meeting which took place in Parliament yesterday as “hastily arranged” and demanded that the deal is subject to an emergency Commons debate ahead of a vote in the European Parliament on February 15.
Ceta Blockers demanded transparency and democracy in any future trade deals.
They claim that Ceta has already been signed by the European Council of Ministers — the decision-making body of the EU — and wrote to MPs warning that if the deal is voted in on February 15 it will be provisionally implemented “without any debate in the UK Parliament.”
Last October, the European scrutiny committee had met and recommended a debate on Ceta due to the “complex legal and policy issues” it raises, both while Britain is a member of the EU and after its withdrawal.
Outside Parliament, Ceta Blockers spokesman Colin Crilly told the Star: “Ceta is on the verge of being signed yet the Commons has not debated it, they keep stalling.
“The lack of transparency and democracy in this deal shows a contempt for the British people, they think they know best.”
“But profit is the driving force behind Ceta and corporations will have the right to sue governments that will act on behalf of corporations instead of the people.
“The NHS is really in the firing line and once it has been privatised it can’t be reversed. Public services are in real jeopardy.”
Friday 15th September 2017
posted by Morning Star in Britain
A TOXIC trade deal stitched up between the EU and Canada that will force the privatisation of British public services will come into force next week.
The Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (Ceta) would allow private firms to sue the government if it “infringes” on their profits — real or hypothetical — including thousands of US firms operating in Canada.
It will restrict the ability to bring in laws that raise the minimum wage or improve health and safety at work.
GMB union international officer Bert Schouwenburg said: “Ceta amounts to a toxic free-trade deal with the US via the back door, given that 85 per cent of US corporations have subsidiaries in Canada.
“We should not be party to any deals that will tie us in for 20 years, given that we are going to leave the EU and that Ceta is opposed by trade unions on both sides of the Atlantic.”
Friday 15th September 2017
posted by Morning Star in Editorial
THE GMB union is right to warn of a “corporate land grab” coming into force in less than a week as the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (Ceta) between Canada and the EU takes effect.
Ceta has attracted less controversy than its US-EU counterpart TTIP, presumably because of Canada’s cuddlier image compared to that of the overbearing superpower to its south.
That image is not wholly deserved. Canada has participated in many of the illegal wars launched by the United States, such as those in Afghanistan and Libya.
Its record on labour law is not good — it has ratified just 34 of the 189 conventions of the International Labour Organisation and the Canadian Foundation for Labour Rights says that Canadians “have seen a serious erosion of … their right to organise into a union and engage in full and free collective bargaining” in recent decades. But the primary problem with Ceta does not lie there.
The treaty, like TTIP, is not about giving additional power to the Canadian or any other government. It is about empowering corporations at the expense of the public.
Chapter 8 of the treaty stops governments placing restrictions on what type of company is eligible to deliver what type of service — so a requirement that state-funded schools or hospitals are not run for profit would be deemed illegal.
The Trade Justice Movement has pointed to numerous anti-democratic clauses in the treaty: article 8.5 “bans domestic content requirements, so governments cannot direct international investment to benefit local communities, for example by requiring investors to make use of local suppliers;” article 8.13 “bans governments from limiting transfers of money and profits, which may make future attempts to limit the use of tax havens more difficult;” “non-discrimination provisions such as clause 19.4 make it difficult for governments to choose a publicly owned operator when deciding who should run a service.”
It’s capped off by an Investor Court System similar to the more infamous Investor State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) mechanism, allowing companies to sue governments if their profits are put at risk.
We know how companies use these courts because they already exist under certain agreements. The Swedish energy giant Vattenfall has sued the German government for trying to impose environmental standards on a power plant on the River Elbe, and again for seeking to phase out the use of nuclear power.
This power to sue the government — ie the public — if a law might reduce profit puts a spoke in the wheel of any attempt to raise labour standards or the minimum wage, as well as any serious bid to address climate change.
Along with the competition law and restrictive conditions applied to public ownership and investment enshrined in the EU’s Lisbon Treaty, Ceta is part of a long line of international agreements which remove corporate behaviour from democratic control and limit our ability to decide on our government’s economic policies.
After years of cross-party consensus over screwing the public in this way, Labour has woken up: “We reject the idea of granting multinational corporations their own, separate, private judicial system through which they can sue host governments,” shadow international trade secretary Barry Gardiner has confirmed.
But unless Labour can take power by next Wednesday, Ceta will be in force and its provisions applicable to our country for 20 years — if we do not prepare ourselves to tear it up.
There is no breach of faith in annulling a treaty agreed behind closed doors which would never have won democratic assent from the British, Canadian or European public.
Labour must make it clear that it will do exactly that — and chart a path towards a future where politics serves the people, not big business.
Wednesday, 8 November 2017
WILBUR ROSS LAYS DOWN THE LAW TO THE UK BOSSES AND GOVERNMENT
PRESIDENT Donald Trump’s senior adviser Wilbur Ross has just addressed the CBI bosses and given that body its orders as to what it must and must not do if the capitalist UK is to have a quick post-EU trade deal with the US.
Ross said his trip to the UK allowed him to ‘address with the UK some concerns we have that they may be tempted to include (provisions) in their agreement with the European Commission (EC) that could be problems for a subsequent FTA (Free Trade Agreement) with the US’.
After this reference to the much loved ideas of two or three or even indefinite years of ‘transition’ in which the UK would remain in the single market, the customs union and under the European Court, Ross continued: ‘It is … important that an eventual Brexit agreement takes into account our commercial interests, and does not hinder development of a closer post-Brexit US-UK relationship by continuing divergent standards and regulations and other protectionist measures.’
Ross said that if the UK chooses to keep the EU ban on genetically modified food and chlorinated chicken, there would be problems in having ‘a subsequent FTA (Free Trade Agreement) with the US.’ Criticising the EU’s external trade policy, he said: ‘The EU talks free trade but actually is highly protectionist.’
He insisted that the US has said it has been ‘fair and open’ in its handling of a trade row that threatens jobs at Bombardier in Belfast, and that import tariffs on the C-Series jet could yet be lifted. Ross said Washington understood ‘the political sensitivity’ around the dispute in Canada and the UK, but added: ‘The fundamentals remain: Even our best friends really have to play by the rules.’
As is well known, Trump’s policy is America first, and that all trade deals, including those with Japan, and China and the EU, will be renegotiated to return more jobs to the US, where the anger of US workers at the growth of mass unemployment and the slashing of living standards has reached explosion point.
His programme amounts to a US declared trade war with the current allies of the US that may not stop at the level of trade disagreements. The US ruling class is thus giving the UK bosses an offer it considers the UK ruling class cannot afford to refuse.
The UK ruling class is however split. It is agreed that the days of the UK standing alone are over, but is split over whether to swear allegiance to Brussels or Wall Street, with the working class to pay the price for either move by providing unlimited cheap labour for the bosses and enduring slashed living standards.
The trade unions are also split over whither the UK, with the major trade unions favouring chaining the working class to the EU. The working class does not have any choice but to drive forward to force the break with the EU, to tell the US bosses to get lost, and to get rid of capitalism and bring in socialism. The WRP is very clear on this issue.
The world capitalist system is in its death agony, with another acute economic and financial crisis developing whose semblance is the falling apart of all of the old regimes of government, and whose essence is that the working class must take the power and establish socialism – or go under with the system.
The working class must refuse to be put into a position where it has to decide under which regime – headed by Wall Street or Brussels – it must suffer a reduction of living standards to ‘Third World’ levels. Instead, it must build the new and revolutionary leadership of the WRP to lead the working class in a political general strike to bring down the collapsed Tories and bring in a workers government and socialism.
The UK workers must take the power and expropriate the bosses and bankers to bring in socialism and a socialist planned economy. It must then form an alliance with the EU and US workers to rid the world of the blight of capitalism and to go forward to a Socialist United States of Europe and then a World Socialist Republic.
Capitalism has had its day. Only a planned socialist economy can rationally utilise the explosive development of automation and robotics to establish the basis of a Communist society, foreseen by Marx, and capable of establishing the norm of ‘From each according to their ability to each according to their needs.’
May and Trump and Juncker must be sent packing, and the workers of the world must take a giant step forward to socialism via the victory of the world socialist revolution.
Pingback: Get Saudi Arabia out of Human Rights Council, petition | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Dutch farmers against CETA Canadian-European Union treaty | Dear Kitty. Some blog