This 20 August 2016 video is called YEMEN: (18+) RAW – Carnage of Saudi Bombing Shows Many Children, Babies & Women Killed. 08.20.2016.
By Jessica Schulberg, Foreign Affairs Reporter, The Huffington Post in the USA:
The U.S. Is Part Of A War In Yemen, And Neither Clinton Nor Trump Will Talk About It
There’s no evidence the next president has a plan forward for the country where American ally Saudi Arabia has been slaughtering civilians.
10/11/2016 04:01 am ET | Updated 28 minutes ago
WASHINGTON ― The U.S. is in a shooting war in Yemen, where the American military has spent years vaporizing suspected terrorists in airstrikes and a Saudi-led coalition is busily slaughtering civilians with American refueling and intelligence support.
You wouldn’t know it from watching the second presidential debate Sunday night. Even after one of the deadliest attacks of the Saudi campaign — a series of airstrikes on a funeral in Sanaa, Yemen’s ancient capital, that killed more than 140 people Saturday — neither Donald Trump nor Hillary Clinton was asked about whether the U.S. should keep aiding an ally that appears to be actively targeting civilians.
Since debate moderators won’t ask the presidential candidates about Yemen, we did. But neither campaign answered, and their public statements alone make it impossible to tell whether they would continue President Barack Obama’s policy of supporting the Saudi-led coalition’s war against the Houthi rebel group that now controls much of the western part of the country, including the capital.
“Shouldn’t this be something we’re discussing as a country?” asked Adam Baron, a visiting fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, who lived in Yemen from 2011 to 2014. “Shouldn’t the American people be aware of the fact that the U.S. is a major part of a war in Yemen?”
Because the U.S. isn’t directly involved in the Saudi-led fight, there are no U.S. troops on the ground and both sides have committed human rights abuses, Yemen barely registers in the political consciousness of American voters. It’s hard to quantify exactly how little the electorate cares about Yemen because pollsters don’t even ask about it.
That helps explain why Clinton and Trump have been able to campaign for over a year without ever being made to outline a plan forward in the country.
It’s hard to say what Trump would do in Yemen. There’s no precedent to refer to, and the one time he talked about Yemen at length was back in January. See if you can make sense of what he said:
“Now they’re going into Yemen, and if you look at Yemen, take a look … they’re going to get Syria, they’re going to get Yemen, unless … trust me, a lot of good things are going to happen if I get in, but let’s just sort of leave it the way it is. They get Syria, they get Yemen. Now they didn’t want Yemen, but you ever see the border between Yemen and Saudi Arabia? They want Saudi Arabia. So what are they going to have? They’re gonna have Iraq, they’re gonna have Iran, they’re gonna have Iraq, they’re gonna have Yemen, they’re gonna have Syria, they’re gonna have everything!”
If Trump were to become president, he’d likely be off to a rocky start with the kingdom. A former Saudi intelligence chief broke a cardinal rule of diplomacy with foreign allies earlier this year and criticized Trump’s proposed Muslim ban at a dinner event. “I just hope you, as American citizens, will make the right choice in November,” Prince Turki al Faisal said at the time.
It’s possible Trump would try to rebuild relations with officials in Saudi Arabia, where he appears to be pursuing a hotel development project. At the same time, his past comments about ditching NATO allies who don’t pay enough for U.S. protection suggest he could also be quick to cut off the Saudis.
Clinton hasn’t offered a plan, either. But her record offers some clues about how she might act. She made a historic trip to Yemen as secretary of state in 2011, when she pledged a “balanced approach” to the country ― meaning social and economic support [to the dictatorial government then ruling Yemen] as well as counterterrorism cooperation. …
There’s no evidence Clinton would do anything to limit U.S. involvement in Yemen.
“My guess is she’d pick up where the administration left off,” said Brian Katulis, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, a think tank closely aligned with Clinton.
The Obama administration plans to “review” its support to the Saudis, a spokesman said after Saturday’s attack. But there doesn’t yet appear to be any consensus about what that review will entail ― or any guarantee that it will take place before Obama leaves office in January. And Obama’s decision against using military force in Syria in 2013, his push for the Iran nuclear agreement, and some undiplomatic comments he made about Saudi Arabia in an interview with The Atlantic have already cost him some leverage with the Saudis, Katulis argued.
“The Saudis have felt that they’ve gotten a particularly cold shoulder [from Obama],” said Jon B. Alterman, a senior vice president at the Center for Strategic & International Studies. “In many ways, the Saudis have responded by giving the cold shoulder.”
A Clinton presidency could end up bringing Washington and Riyadh closer together.
Saudi Arabia and its coalition allies have been major donors to the Clinton Foundation. As secretary of state, Clinton was closely involved in securing a $29 billion arms sale to Saudi Arabia. Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta co-founded a public relations firm in 1988 with his brother Tony that now counts Saudi Arabia as a client. John no longer works with the firm, but Tony, who heads it, is a major contributor to the Clinton campaign. Tony works personally on the $140,000-per-month Saudi contract, The Washington Post reported earlier this year.
Clinton would be better than Obama at managing the personal part of the relationship with the Saudis, Alterman said. “It’s about having the Saudis feel that they’re going to trust you and take your advice over their better judgment,” he said. “And I think we’re at a point in the Obama-[King] Salman relationship where that’s simply not happening.”
A new administration can result in a brief “honeymoon period,” Katulis said. …
But there’s no guarantee that improved relations between the two countries would translate into Riyadh exercising more caution in Yemen. And if heavy civilian casualties resulting from the Saudi-led coalition’s airstrikes continue, it’s hard to imagine Clinton would be willing to cut off U.S. support.
“If anything, I would see her being more cautious about breaking with the Saudis,” Baron said.
In the meantime, the U.S. role in the conflict in Yemen will continue to escalate. After the debate ended Sunday evening, someone in a Houthi-controlled part of the country fired two missiles into the Red Sea. They missed. But their target was a U.S. Navy destroyer.
UK and US complicit in Saudi Arabian war crimes: here.
The conflict in Yemen is escalating following the criminal strikes by Saudi war planes on Saturday on a packed funeral hall that killed at least 140 civilians and wounded more than 500. The attack has provoked widespread outrage in the capital of Sanaa, not only against Saudi Arabia and its Gulf State allies that have intervened aggressively in the country’s civil war, but also against its backers—the United States, Britain and France: here.
Tuesday 11th October 2016
posted by Morning Star in World
UN HUMAN rights high commissioner Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein denounced the weekend Saudi-led air strikes on a funeral yesterday and criticised the UN human rights council for allowing a “climate of impunity” in Yemen.
Mr Hussein reiterated his calls for an independent investigation of rights abuses and other violations in Yemen.
The 47-member Geneva-based council, which includes Saudi Arabia, all but ignored those calls at its last session in September.
The high commissioner noted that weddings, marketplaces, hospitals, schools “and now mourners at a funeral” have been hit during the conflict, “resulting in massive civilian casualties and zero accountability for those responsible.”
Since the Saudi-led US-backed coalition started bombing Shi’ite Houthi rebels in March 2015, at least 4,125 civilians have been killed and more than 7,200 wounded in Yemen, his office disclosed.
German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier expressed concern over the Sanaa massacre, saying “those responsible for this cruel act must be found” and such attacks must not be repeated.
Two missiles fired from rebel-held territory in Yemen landed near a US destroyer in the Red Sea, the US Navy said yesterday.
The missile launches on Sunday coincided with a ballistic missile fired from Yemen and apparently targeted at a Saudi air base near Mecca in the deepest strike yet into the kingdom by Houthi rebels and their allies.
Monday 10th October 2016
posted by Morning Star in Editorial
THE VICIOUS slaughter of more than 140 mourners and the maiming and mutilation of hundreds more in Yemen’s capital Sanaa by the Saudi-led military coalition demands an immediate response. And it has been clear for a very long time what sort of response would be best from Britain.
The British government has approved the sale of billions of pounds of weaponry, munitions and war machines to Saudi Arabia — the very weapons deployed against the people of Yemen.
Britain maintains a delegation of military personnel to the Saudis and offers training and support. The relationship stretches back not just decades, as Britain has sought to maintain its position in the strategically vital, oil-rich Middle East, but fully 100 years.
It extends from the Saudis’ present-day bloodbath in Yemen to the state’s founder Ibn Saud and the 400,000 people killed to establish his family’s sordid supremacy over the peninsula.
And throughout, it encompasses tacit British support for the Saudis and their fanatical Wahhabi creed which has brought so much destruction to the region, backing the country’s royals as a bulwark against the threat that people of the Middle East might determine their own future — free of outside interference and reactionary rule at home.
The work of Mark Curtis to expose this hidden history, and Britain’s historical and present support for other Gulf despotisms, means there is no room for doubt. The unceasing material and diplomatic support provided by our rulers to the Saudis must be read as deliberate. There is no “failure” to act here — it is a positive choice to allow the Saudis to do what they wish. The targeting of a funeral, too, shows that Saudi Arabia is following in the footsteps of its Western patrons — the US particularly is notorious in Pakistan for using drones to murder mourners at funerals and butcher brides at weddings.
As the experts at the Campaign Against Arms Trade will tell you, on paper Britain has tough rules on arms sales. But in practice they may as well not exist.
And the report by War on Want published last week — reviewed by Ross Hemingway in our weekend edition — neatly shows that this is not an oversight or a mistake but part of a package of policies to prop up repressive Gulf states.
Thankfully in Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn we have a politician who has spelled it out explicitly: Britain must not arm countries that slaughter their own people or those elsewhere.
Arms sales to Saudi Arabia must end, and so must the diplomatic and military support that acts as a cover for its crimes.
Pingback: Saudi, Qatari governments fund ISIS, Clinton admitted secretly | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Two Saudis on trial for using fake passports to join Syrian war | RiyadhVision
Pingback: United States Navy attacks Yemen, helping Saudis killing civilians | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: ‘United States government helping butchery of Yemeni civilians’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Clinton-Trump, their last election debate | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi royal bloodbath in Yemen, NATO helps | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton scandals update | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Trump would get only 6% of Dutch votes | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi bombs destroy Yemeni homes | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: British taxpayers’ money kills Yemeni civilians | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Sanders on why Clinton lost to Trump | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Bahrain absolute monarchy-Trump connection | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Trump’s anti-refugee policies, parody song | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: ‘United States soldiers kill scores of Yemeni civilians’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Nazi terrorism not terrorism, according to Trump? | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Donald Trump, Yemen, Saudi Arabia and oil | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Pentagon-Saudi war on Yemen helps al-Qaeda | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: More United States bloodshed in Yemen | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi air force bombs Yemeni funeral again | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Angela Davis about feminism | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Trump against education, demonstrators against Trump | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Laughing a crime in Trump’s USA? | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Trump helps Saudi butchery of Yemeni civilians | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Melania Trump’s rose-coloured glasses on Saudi women’s rights | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi bombs kill Yemeni civilians with cholera | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: How Hillary Clinton made Trump president | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Stop the war in Yemen | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Labour party in the USA? | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Donald Trump after one year | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Pro-Trump Moore loses Alabama Senate election | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: American Green party witch-hunted in ‘Russia’ hysteria | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Steven Spielberg’s new film The Post | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Clintonite Democrats, fossil fuel politicians | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi war crimes in Yemen, United Nations report | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi bloody war on Yemen, and the USA | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi regime murders journalist, protest | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi journalist murdered, British Conservatives’ lame response | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi regime’s new lies on murdering journalist | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: US corporate Democrat anti-Semitic attack on Bernie Sanders | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: DAPL pipeline police violence | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Facebook censorship of European elections | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: United States far-right groups and Donald Trump | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudis tortured, beheaded for peacemongering, pro-democracy demonstration | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi crown prince kills his own people | Dear Kitty. Some blog