German warmongers whitewash al-Qaeda on 9/11

This video says about itself:

Bin Laden, the CIA, and 1980’s

6 April 2012

Clips from a National Geographic film that details the CIA relationship with the Mujahideen.

By Peter Schwarz in Germany:

German weekly Die Zeit defends Al Qaeda

13 September 2016

As is well known, truth is the first casualty of war. This applies in particular to the Syrian war. The reports of German television and newspapers are generally nothing but propaganda.

Germany’s leading media present the picture of an uneven struggle between a bloodthirsty dictator, who is supported by similarly brutal foreign powers (Iran, Russia), and so-called “rebels,” who defend the people against the attacks of the Assad regime and the terrorism of the Islamic State [ISIS]. The rebels, according to this official presentation, are (inadequately) supported—or even sabotaged—by the NATO powers.

The historical and political background to the conflict is suppressed, as are the political and economic interests pursued by the US, Germany and other NATO powers in the Middle East. Above all, the real role and aims of the so-called “rebels,” who are supported and armed by the USA and its allies, are carefully concealed.

Two years ago, the German media deliberately obscured the fascistic nature of the armed militias behind the coup in Ukraine. Now they systematically conceal the fact that the Syrian “rebels” mainly consist of Islamist jihadis. The Western powers work with the same forces in Syria that they utilize as a pretext for building a police state at home and mounting military interventions abroad under the pretext of the “war against terror.”

There are, however, moments in which the mask falls off and more is said than intended. Such is the case with the article “Assad needs war” by Andrea Böhm, which appeared on Die Zeit online on September 11.

The Beirut-based Middle East correspondent of the liberal weekly is obviously outraged by the agreement on Syria that the US and Russia announced Saturday. This is not “an agreement on a ceasefire,” she writes, but rather “an agreement on who is allowed to be bombed after Monday.”

The suggestion that a deal signed by Washington, which has conducted war in the region for 25 years and largely destroyed Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria, could bring peace to the ravaged country is of course absurd. Washington has acquiesced to the agreement in order to give some respite to its proxy forces around Aleppo. In addition, it is exploiting the dreadful conditions faced by the Syrian people to prepare for an even greater military intervention under the pretext of defending “human rights.”

But this is not what Die Zeit is attacking. Rather, Böhm is appalled that the Russian-American agreement calls upon the “moderate rebels” to “distance themselves not only militarily but also physically from the old Nusra Front in the next days.”

“The non-jihadist armed groups, including the ‘Free Syrian Army’, believe they have been betrayed and sold out to Assad and Putin by the US and its Western allies,” complains Böhm. And this “for understandable reasons.” The group is “the strongest military faction in the ranks of the anti-Assad forces. … The enhanced former Nusra Front has become the life insurance for many moderate rebel groups. To reject it would be considered by most of them as political and military suicide.”

Böhm leaves no doubt as to the character of the Nusra Front. It is, as she writes, the “offshoot of Al Qaeda in Syria, which recently seceded on tactical grounds from the terrorist network and renamed itself Jabhat Fateh al-Sham [Front for the Conquest of Syria/the Levant].”

This means that the Syrian branch of Al Qaeda, which was responsible for the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001 and which has served as a pretext for the “war on terror” ever since, is the “life insurance” of Washington’s and Berlin’s Syrian allies and the “the strongest military faction in the ranks of the anti-Assad forces,” which they support. That Böhm’s article appeared on the 15th anniversary of 9/11 underscores the cynicism of Die Zeit .

One can easily imagine what will happen to Syria should these forces prevail. One need only look to Libya, where numerous warlords and Islamist groups are terrorizing the country since the US and its allies brought about the fall of the Gaddafi regime. The numerous ethnic and religious minorities living in Syria for centuries would face ethnic cleansing and expulsion.

It was certainly not Böhm’s intention, but her article convincingly refutes the allegation that the military interventions by the Western powers in Syria serves humanistic goals. Both the US and Germany are pursuing imperialist interests there—control of the world’s most important oil and gas reserves and of a region of enormous geo-strategic importance. In doing so, they consciously accept the deaths of hundreds of thousands, and the displacement of millions.

It is significant that this article appeared in Die Zeit, whose readership comes mainly from the liberal, pro-SPD, educated upper-middle class. With the intensification of social and international tensions, these layers of the well-off petty bourgeoisie are increasingly moving to the right and enthusiastically supporting German militarism.

Thus Die Zeit editor Jochen Bittner is among the pioneers of an aggressive military German foreign policy. He co-authored the paper “New Power—New Responsibility” that prepared the return of German militarism.

Also the Greens, who rest on the same social milieu, favour a military intervention in Syria by Germany. Their defence spokesman Omid Nouripour, speaking on the German national public radio network Deutschlandfunk, also criticised the demand that “the Free Syrian Army, the so-called moderate opposition, that all forces fighting against Assad must now disentangle themselves from the so-called Jabhat Fateh al-Sham, the former Nusra Front.”

“I don’t know how that should happen,” he said. “Meanwhile, in the north of the country the former Nusra Front is the strongest force against Assad, and if one breaks away from it, one must give up a lot of territory throughout the country. I do not think many groups are willing to do that.”

Al Qaeda’s ties to US-Backed Syrian rebels: here.

What’s In A Name? U.S. Takes Syria’s Al-Qaeda Off Terror Watchlists. By changing its name to Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), the Syrian branch of al-Qaeda has managed to secure its removal from the U.S. and Canadian terror watchlists, allowing citizens of those countries to donate money and travel to fight with them: here.

In a backhand way, The New York Times admits that the U.S.-backed “moderate” rebels in east Aleppo are fighting alongside Al Qaeda jihadists, an almost casual admission of this long-obscured reality: here.

93 thoughts on “German warmongers whitewash al-Qaeda on 9/11

  1. Pingback: United States $5 trillion wars | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  2. Pingback: United States-Danish-Australian killing of Syrian soldiers | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. US State Department spokesman Mark Toner angrily denied on Monday that Washington had supplied the al-Qaida-affiliated Nusra Front with advanced heavy weapons, after a leader of the group told a German newspaper that it had received such arms from the US.

    However, unnamed Pentagon officials told the Reuters news agency that Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey may soon send large number of US-supplied shoulder-launched anti-aircraft missiles to the insurgents.


  4. Pingback: Saudi, Qatari governments fund ISIS, Clinton admitted secretly | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: French civil liberties in danger | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: Harvard University, financial elites and Venezuela | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: Al-Qaeda’s bloody Berlin Christmas? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: Nazi terrorism not terrorism, according to Trump? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: Drowned Syrian boy Aylan’s aunt speaks | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: ‘Trump lied about Syrian chemical attack’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: Sectarian massacre of Shiite Syrian civilians | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: Trump’s air force keeps killing Syrian civilians | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: British Conservative war secretary celebrated Assad’s victory | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  14. Pingback: Donald Trump, United States media and wars | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  15. Pingback: Criminal bloodbath at Ariana Grande concert in England | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  16. Pingback: Manchester massacre, mourn, don’t abuse for racism | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  17. Pingback: Homeless people help Manchester bomb victims | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  18. Pingback: From NATO’s Libya child soldier to Manchester terrorist | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  19. Pingback: NATO helps Saudi monarchy, cause of terrorism | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  20. Pingback: United States nazi terrorists not terrorists? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  21. Pingback: Saudi-Qatar absolute monarchies quarrel | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  22. Pingback: ‘War on terror’ brings terror to Britain | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  23. Pingback: Police knew London Bridge terrorists, did not stop them | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  24. Pingback: Qatar-Saudi gas conflict, Trump and Britain | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  25. Pingback: Saudi-Qatari conflict and Donald Trump | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  26. Pingback: Trump deports refugees to Iraq war | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  27. Pingback: Trump’s air force kills ISIS’ prisoners | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  28. Pingback: British Conservatives, Trump’s Syria war poodles | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  29. Pingback: Protesters against British weapons sales to Saudi Arabia arrested | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  30. Pingback: British government’s Saudi allies promote terrorism in Britain | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  31. Pingback: British Theresa May ‘against terrorism’, is she joking? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  32. Pingback: Trump’s Islamophobia in the USA | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  33. Pingback: Neocolonial war in Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  34. Pingback: British Conservative government covers up Saudi export of terrorism | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  35. Pingback: ExxonMobil grab at Afghan oil | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  36. Pingback: Bloody attack in Barcelona abused for militarism, racism | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  37. Pingback: Barcelona demonstrators denounce terrorism, government’s militarism | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  38. Pingback: New York City 9/11 after sixteen years | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  39. Pingback: United States police kill LGBTQ student activist | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  40. Pingback: Spanish police brutality, its supporters and opponents | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  41. Pingback: Saudi regime kills Yemeni children, gets slap on the wrist | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  42. Pingback: Spanish opposition to Rajoy’s violence, not only in Catalonia | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  43. Pingback: Russia-bashing, pretext for attacking civil liberties | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  44. Pingback: British taxpayers’ money to terrorists, dictators | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  45. Pingback: Dutch government stops paying Syrian jihadists | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  46. Pingback: British taxpayers’ money to terrorism in Syria | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  47. Pingback: British government paying jihadists in Syria | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  48. Pingback: NATO warmongers as pseudo-feminists | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  49. Pingback: French Big Business-ISIS collusion | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  50. Pingback: More German, French neocolonial wars | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.