Facebook censors Norwegian Prime Minster on Vietnam war


Kim Phuc with baby in 2005

This photo shows Ms Kim Phuc, who became well-known from a photograph, taken when, as a nine-year-old girl in Vietnam in 1972, napalm bombs injured her. As this 2005 photo of Kim Phuc shows, the napalm scars are still visible and still hurt.

Translated from Dutch NOS TV:

Vietnam photo also deleted from Facebook page of Norwegian Prime Minister

Today, 15:14

The historical photo of the “napalm girl” from Vietnam has not only been removed from the Norwegian newspaper Aftenposten‘s Facebook page, but also from the page of the Norwegian Prime Minister Erna Solberg.

She placed the picture, like many other Norwegians, on her page in protest of Facebook’s removal policy. The company believes that there is too much nudity in the photo.

Solberg has posted a new message in which she expresses the hope that Facebook will change its policy. She writes: “I want our children to grow up in a society where they can learn history as it really was.”

Ms Solberg is a member of the Norwegian conservative party.

But, apparently, not conservative enough for Facebook. Apparently, to Facebook one is only a ‘real’ conservative if, to quote George Orwell’s 1984, one believes that ‘War is peace‘. And if one censors the crimes of the Vietnam war and other wars out of ‘history as it really was’.

UPDATE: after many protests, Facebook gave in and restored the photo.

Advertisements

43 thoughts on “Facebook censors Norwegian Prime Minster on Vietnam war

  1. Pingback: Billionaire Bill Gates’ poor schools in Africa | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  2. Pingback: Facebook censors burn injuries survivor | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: Bill Gates’ filthy schools for African children | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Monday 6th February 2017

    posted by Morning Star in Arts

    The American War in Vietnam: Crime or Commemoration?

    by John Marciano

    (Monthly Review Press, £14.65)

    FOR the past few decades, an unholy alliance of politicians, generals, journalists and academics have spent unlimited time and resources trying to convince the world that the US invasion of Vietnam was done with the best of intentions, the general narrative being that it was an idealistic crusade centred on the defence of democracy.

    If crimes did occur, these were very much exceptional mistakes and, if they weren’t, actions do have to be contextualised. After all, wasn’t the communist enemy 10 times worse?

    It’s an unremitting campaign and one which has returned with a vengeance as the empire continues to justify ongoing warfare against all those not willing to play ball.

    Commemoration of the war has also been an assault on the truth which has united Democrat and Republican alike, exposing once again all that is rotten at the heart of a “democratic” system completely dominated by the ultra-rich.

    Presidents Clinton, Obama and Trump can position themselves wherever they want.

    But when it comes to Vietnam and, indeed, every other imperialist intervention before, during and after, it’s very much business as usual.

    Even the mildest of criticisms is demonised as unpatriotic and, unsurprisingly, long term anti-war activist John Marciano has a different take on things altogether. In this short but intense volume, he quickly demolishes some of the more perennial myths that have grown up around the conflict.

    The war on Vietnam is very much seen as coming in a long line of invasions motivated purely by the need to defend the interest of monopoly capital.

    Beneath all the hypocritical platitudes about freedom, Marciano shows that US foreign policy is far more about ensuring access to cheap labour, markets and raw materials and destroying all those societies who try to take a different, if not explicitly, non-capitalist path.

    Irrespective of what the liberal consensus is today, the stance taken by former president Kennedy towards Vietnam was hardly one of someone who respected the right to national independence.

    Differences between him and other members of the militaristic elite were more ones of effective strategy than moral outlook.

    Marciano is unafraid to argue that both the infamous Gulf of Tonkin incident and the ridiculous but still ongoing cult about missing-in-action GIs have no factual basis.

    He ably demonstrates the horrific extent to which the US military used huge amounts of chemical and biological weaponry and totally exposes the oft-repeated lie about the massacre at My Lai standing alone in its brutality.

    On the home front, the book explores the carefully constructed image of an anti-war movement dominated by middle-class, toytown revolutionaries who were all too happy to stab serving soldiers in the back — 10 out of 10 for anyone who can name an earlier German movement willing to make political capital out of this one — pointing out how opposition to the war was far more working class and multinational than later accounts depicted.

    Alleged hostility to soldiers would hardly have sat comfortably alongside the work of the massively influential Vietnam Veterans Against the War and with the widespread and subsequently ignored network of safe houses, bust funds, coffee shops and underground newspapers set up specifically for, and often by, conscripts.

    Marciano’s book is an excellent riposte to those who would revise history but it’s sad that it still has to be made.

    Steven Andrew

    http://morningstaronline.co.uk/a-8beb-Myth-busting-revelations-of-US-war-on-Vietnam#.WJmEzvKbIdU

  5. Pingback: Dutch taxpayers paying for Bill Gates’ sordid African schools | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: British Ukip and United States Breitbart site | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: Cambodian elephants saved from Pentagon bomb crater | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: The Batman of Vietnam | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: Lindsay Lohan’s ‘burkini’ in Thailand | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: Facebook censorship on women’s reproductive rights | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: Facebook censoring feminism | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: Facebook helps Rohingya genocide in Myanmar | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: Facebook censors Syrian Kurds, helping Erdogan, ISIS | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  14. Pingback: Facebook becoming censorshipbook and spybook | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  15. Pingback: Dutch protest song against Shell, Exxon earthquakes | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  16. Pingback: Facebook-Cambridge Analytica anti-privacy scandal | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  17. Pingback: New Facebook privacy scandal | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  18. Pingback: Profits before human lives, Facebook says | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  19. Pingback: Facebook boss anti-privacy, pro-censorship | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  20. Pingback: Facebook censors Arizona teachers’ group | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  21. Pingback: ‘Mark Zuckerberg Hospital should be renamed’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  22. Pingback: Another Facebook privacy scandal | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  23. Pingback: Facebook censoring non-corporate media voices | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  24. Pingback: Dutch university stops cooperation with Facebook censorship | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  25. Pingback: Anti-Semitism whitewashed on Facebook, in Austria | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  26. Pingback: Facebook censors painter Rubens, not nazism | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  27. Pingback: Facebook censors United States anti-nazis, opponents of Trump’s xenophobia | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  28. Pingback: Facebook anti-leftist political censorship | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  29. Pingback: Anti-left-wing censorship on Twitter, Facebook | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  30. Pingback: Anti-democratic far-right education in Michigan, USA | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  31. Pingback: Facebook censoring news disliked by establishment | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  32. Pingback: Is bombing Vietnamese civilians ‘war heroism’? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  33. Pingback: Trump, Google lie about Internet censorship | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  34. Pingback: Facebook censors non-terrorists as ‘terrorists’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  35. Pingback: More Internet censorship in the USA | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  36. Pingback: Facebook outsources Internet censorship to unskilled underpaid Filipinos | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  37. Pingback: Facebook censorship of photos, videos | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  38. Pingback: Painter Rubens’ partial victory against Facebook censorship | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  39. Pingback: Prude rich censorship attempt of Barbie doll art | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  40. Pingback: United States Pentagon Internet censorship plans | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  41. Pingback: Google, Facebook admit their political censorship | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  42. Pingback: Bezos’ Washington Post helps Facebook censorship | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.