This video says about itself:
Britain, Bahrain, and torture
26 March 2015
The leader of the largest party in Bahrain is in court today for promoting political change. The UK continues to support the gulf state, with Cameron refusing to even countenance the boycott of the Bahrain Grand Prix. With recent footage showing a protest apparently shot for holding up a picture of opposition leader Sheikh Ali Salman, will Britain step away from a regime dogged with accusations of a human rights record that includes torture. And the government also failed to respond to calls to arrest Prince Nasser bin Hamad al-Khalifa, who posted a selfie video of him running in Hyde Park last week.
From daily The Independent in Britain:
Royal Navy base construction begins in Bahrain as Britain seeks a return to ‘East of Suez‘
The major strategic shift has dismayed human rights campaigners
Sunday 1 November 2015
Construction has begun on a controversial Royal Navy base in Bahrain, as Britain’s seeks a return to “East of Suez” in a major strategic shift that has dismayed human rights campaigners.
Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond travelled to the Gulf kingdom this weekend to break ground on HMS Juffair, the first major naval base opened by Britain in the east of the Suez canal since 1971.
The ceremony [at] Mina Salman Port in Bahrain comes as the UK is pushing to strengthen economic and military ties in the region, but has prompted outcry from human rights campaigners who say the ruling Al Khalifa family in Bahrain is overseeing an on-going crackdown on human rights and freedom of expression.
Mr Hammond said the beginning of construction at Mina Slaman Port marked a “watershed moment” in the UK’s commitment to the region and ensuring stability in the Gulf.
The Royal Navy base was first announced in December last year, amid allegations the base was “reward” for Britain’s silence over on-going human rights violations in the Gulf state. Since then Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have noted with growing concern that the Bahraini government has arrested a sting of political leaders.
This weekend’s announcement that construction has started on the base, which will support four UK minesweepers as well as visiting frigates and destroyers, has provoked fresh criticism as it comes after a major Amnesty International report found that human rights abuses continued “unabated” in Bahrain.
The report, which was released earlier this year, documented dozens of cases of detainees being beaten, deprived of sleep and adequate food, burned with cigarettes, sexually assaulted and subjected to electric shocks.
“All the British government’s policies show is a commitment to military expansion at the cost of human rights,” said Sayed Ahmed Alwadaei, director of Advocacy at the Bahrain Institute for Rights and Democracy. “Bahrain continues to systemically arbitrarily arrest, torture and silence any critic of the government. This new base is totally inappropriate.”
Campaigners are also dismayed that the Royal Navy has chosen to name HMS Juffair after a 1930s colonial base in the country, amid suggestions that the UK is “celebrating a legacy of repression”. …
The base will provide support and accommodation for around 80 UK military personnel based in Bahrain, and end a British reliance on the facilities of the far larger US Navy Fifth Fleet which is also based at the port. It is expected to be complete by autumn 2016 and will eventually provide port facilities for the Royal Navy’s new generation of aircraft carriers.
It is expected to be opposed by Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, who put down an Early Day Motion in Parliament against the new base in February. It argued that the base would be “deeply upsetting for those who suffered human rights abuses by the government of Bahrain” and would “exacerbate tensions in the region.”
See also here.
Questions raised over legality of new UK base in Bahrain: here.
Top Bahrain activist Nabeel Rajab calls for release of al-Singace to attend his mother’s funeral: here.
Also from The Independent, 1 November 2015:
UK-Saudi talks on ‘judicial co-operation’
Britain is still in discussions with Saudi Arabia about co-operating on justice issues despite cancelling a bid to run prison training services in the Gulf state, the Human Rights minister has revealed.
Dominic Raab said the British Embassy in Riyadh was in “ongoing discussions” with the Saudi authorities on possible areas of judicial co-operation but that the Government has not yet carried out any work in the country.
The talks relate to a memorandum of understanding signed in September 2014 designed to foster “dialogue on human rights and an exchange of expertise on justice and legal matters”, according to the Government.
The admission – in a series of written parliamentary answers to Labour’s justice spokesman Andy Slaughter – comes just weeks after the Justice Secretary, Michael Gove, succeeded amid cabinet opposition in cancelling the £5.9m prison training bid in Saudi Arabia – a country notorious for public beheadings, floggings and torture.
Reblogged this on perfectlyfadeddelusions.
Pingback: Bahrain human rights violations update | Dear Kitty. Some blog
What is the cost to British taxpayers for a navel base constructed in Bahrain? and who gains from this enterprise? the British government once again committed to a deviant government both implicated with no concern for morality but committed to violence and corruption.
“A report in the Telegraph states that the base will cost £15 million, and will upgrade facilities currently used by four British minehunter vessels working in the Gulf. – See more at: http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/new-uk-bahrain-naval-base-named-after-former-colonial-operation-1202039130#sthash.h4jDMcwF.dpuf ”
The Telegraph being the Torygraph, and the frequency of ‘cost overruns’ in military budgets, may mean this will cost far more than £15 million.
The minehunter base is to protect British economic interests? if the colonist countries had not taken the path of militarism and its cost to preserve its interests and paid a reasonable return to Bahrain rather than colluding with puppet governments? so to socialist? is this not a better path than violence? or Parliament fears losing privileges not only for those who are in Parliament but more so those who Parliament serves?
Pingback: Bahrain, dictatorship and football news update | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: British Conservative government supports Bahraini human rights violations | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: British government wants ‘humanitarian’ wars without human rights | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: British government-Saudi Arabian government relations | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Britain and Spain, NATO allies’ Gibraltar war? | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: British, Spanish conservative Gibraltar sabre rattling | Dear Kitty. Some blog